Packers Huddle

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 07:18

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 09:56

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 07:18

Peter brings up good points. Kinda reveals some ways that Rodgers has been less than authentic/honest in his dealings with the Pack. I mean, even if Mark Murphy and Guty have been horrendous in dealing with Rodgers (they haven’t), after having such a storied career in GB, he should express more appreciation for the Packer FO. And that kind of attitude also plays into what a guy takes to the field, or doesn’t take to the field.

I’m suggesting that maybe if Rodgers would have been more humble and appreciative, he might’ve even been able to be more productive on the field and inspirational to the entire team.

Yoop wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:15

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 09:56

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 07:18

Peter brings up good points. Kinda reveals some ways that Rodgers has been less than authentic/honest in his dealings with the Pack. I mean, even if Mark Murphy and Guty have been horrendous in dealing with Rodgers (they haven’t), after having such a storied career in GB, he should express more appreciation for the Packer FO. And that kind of attitude also plays into what a guy takes to the field, or doesn’t take to the field.

I’m suggesting that maybe if Rodgers would have been more humble and appreciative, he might’ve even been able to be more productive on the field and inspirational to the entire team.

I've said it since 2017, Rodger has been pissed because as his receivers declined to basically Adams and a bunch of low floor groomer receivers our GM's ( Ted and Gute) have basically refused to supply him with high floor prospects.

ya have to ask yourself this simple question, what does a QB do? amongst running the offense, they throw the ball, so it only stands to reason limiting that ability is bound to !@#$ a person off.

Murphy stepped in and fired McCarthy, rather then giving what McCarthy and by extension Rodgers needed to make the offense better, in essense they took the direction of the offense in a different direction, and as we know Rodgers didn't like it, but made the most of it with a 13-3 season, but his attitude ( my impression) caused Guty to draft his replacement, whether that sparked Rodgers towards two more 13 win seasons and MVP honors, who knows, but the offense revolved around the running of Jones and Dillon and the passing revolved around Rodgers and Adams, or a repeat of the passing of 2018

It shouldn't surprise anyone that Rodgers is upset and holds a grudge against those that call the shots the last 7 years, I'd be shocked if he didn't, true they can say they had the over all team in mind spending almost all resources on defense, but essentially they cropped one of the best QB's in NFL history of what he had shown over and over to be as good as any to ever play, and that was big chunk play passing, Don Coryall brought spread vertical offense to the league in the 60's and Rodgers showcased it in 2011, why would anyone of sound mind ever divert themselves from that

Acrobat wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:26

Yoop wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:15

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 09:56

Peter brings up good points. Kinda reveals some ways that Rodgers has been less than authentic/honest in his dealings with the Pack. I mean, even if Mark Murphy and Guty have been horrendous in dealing with Rodgers (they haven’t), after having such a storied career in GB, he should express more appreciation for the Packer FO. And that kind of attitude also plays into what a guy takes to the field, or doesn’t take to the field.

I’m suggesting that maybe if Rodgers would have been more humble and appreciative, he might’ve even been able to be more productive on the field and inspirational to the entire team.

I've said it since 2017, Rodger has been pissed because as his receivers declined to basically Adams and a bunch of low floor groomer receivers our GM's ( Ted and Gute) have basically refused to supply him with high floor prospects.

ya have to ask yourself this simple question, what does a QB do? amongst running the offense, they throw the ball, so it only stands to reason limiting that ability is bound to !@#$ a person off.

Murphy stepped in and fired McCarthy, rather then giving what McCarthy and by extension Rodgers needed to make the offense better, in essense they took the direction of the offense in a different direction, and as we know Rodgers didn't like it, but made the most of it with a 13-3 season, but his attitude ( my impression) caused Guty to draft his replacement, whether that sparked Rodgers towards two more 13 win seasons and MVP honors, who knows, but the offense revolved around the running of Jones and Dillon and the passing revolved around Rodgers and Adams, or a repeat of the passing of 2018

It shouldn't surprise anyone that Rodgers is upset and holds a grudge against those that call the shots the last 7 years, I'd be shocked if he didn't, true they can say they had the over all team in mind spending almost all resources on defense, but essentially they cropped one of the best QB's in NFL history of what he had shown over and over to be as good as any to ever play, and that was big chunk play passing, Don Coryall brought spread vertical offense to the league in the 60's and Rodgers showcased it in 2011, why would anyone of sound mind ever divert themselves from that

This is the first time I've seen you bring up this argument.

Acrobat wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:26

Yoop wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:15

Scott4Pack wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 09:56

Peter brings up good points. Kinda reveals some ways that Rodgers has been less than authentic/honest in his dealings with the Pack. I mean, even if Mark Murphy and Guty have been horrendous in dealing with Rodgers (they haven’t), after having such a storied career in GB, he should express more appreciation for the Packer FO. And that kind of attitude also plays into what a guy takes to the field, or doesn’t take to the field.

I’m suggesting that maybe if Rodgers would have been more humble and appreciative, he might’ve even been able to be more productive on the field and inspirational to the entire team.

I've said it since 2017, Rodger has been pissed because as his receivers declined to basically Adams and a bunch of low floor groomer receivers our GM's ( Ted and Gute) have basically refused to supply him with high floor prospects.

ya have to ask yourself this simple question, what does a QB do? amongst running the offense, they throw the ball, so it only stands to reason limiting that ability is bound to !@#$ a person off.

Murphy stepped in and fired McCarthy, rather then giving what McCarthy and by extension Rodgers needed to make the offense better, in essense they took the direction of the offense in a different direction, and as we know Rodgers didn't like it, but made the most of it with a 13-3 season, but his attitude ( my impression) caused Guty to draft his replacement, whether that sparked Rodgers towards two more 13 win seasons and MVP honors, who knows, but the offense revolved around the running of Jones and Dillon and the passing revolved around Rodgers and Adams, or a repeat of the passing of 2018

It shouldn't surprise anyone that Rodgers is upset and holds a grudge against those that call the shots the last 7 years, I'd be shocked if he didn't, true they can say they had the over all team in mind spending almost all resources on defense, but essentially they cropped one of the best QB's in NFL history of what he had shown over and over to be as good as any to ever play, and that was big chunk play passing, Don Coryall brought spread vertical offense to the league in the 60's and Rodgers showcased it in 2011, why would anyone of sound mind ever divert themselves from that

This is the first time I've seen you bring up this argument.

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:39

Here we go

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:39

Here we go
**snip**

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:34

Yoop right now after not having said that in a few days.

Labrev wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 12:41

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:39

Here we go
**snip**

About time!! Rodgers to SanFran makes more sense for both parties than any other respective QB or Team. Were they really going to delude themselves into thinking they can get away with starting Darnold for any extended period?

Now Rodgers just has to get over his grudge with a long-since-departed SanFran mgmt that snubbed him. I think he will warm up to it quickly, but you never know with him.

Cut the crap and pay up, Jets. There are no options left for you at QB. You keep $%@# around and you will find out.

Yoop wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 13:42

Labrev wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 12:41

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 11:39

Here we go
**snip**

About time!! Rodgers to SanFran makes more sense for both parties than any other respective QB or Team. Were they really going to delude themselves into thinking they can get away with starting Darnold for any extended period?

Now Rodgers just has to get over his grudge with a long-since-departed SanFran mgmt that snubbed him. I think he will warm up to it quickly, but you never know with him.

Cut the crap and pay up, Jets. There are no options left for you at QB. You keep $%@# around and you will find out.

Darnold who? the Brock is there starting QB, that name alone screams football, screams championship football

Labrev wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 13:58

Purdy ruptured a ligament in his throwing arm. He is going to need a long time to rehab it, nobody knows when he will be healthy enough to throw, and when he is, at one point he will prepped enough to play again.

BSA wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 14:07

Labrev wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 13:58

Purdy ruptured a ligament in his throwing arm. He is going to need a long time to rehab it, nobody knows when he will be healthy enough to throw, and when he is, at one point he will prepped enough to play again.

The " Rodgers now, Purdy later" plan is really kinda perfect for the 9ers. Givea Purdy more time to rehab and develop
MDs say Purdy will be good to go in August/September, but ideally you'd let him rehab without the pressure of playing

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2023 14:16

Yeah. Worth noting the 49ers do not have any picks until 100

It would have to be future picks.

But if we’re onto fallback plan teams, it’s probably after the draft anyway.