The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Why the last part?Yoop wrote: ↑18 Dec 2023 15:44
and I have a feeling I'll regret answering you.
he pissed a bitch when Barry stuck him in his passive zones 28 games ago against Jefferson, and Barry allowed him to single up on Jefferson later, since then it's back to passive zone, ya don't need to read anything to know Alexander dislikes Barry's defensive schemes.
why this is so hard for you to realize is regrettable
Sigh, why gotta be such a d and condescending? So pointless ever asking you a simple question and expecting it answered.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Dec 2023 15:44
and I have a feeling I'll regret answering you.
he pissed a bitch when Barry stuck him in his passive zones 28 games ago against Jefferson, and Barry allowed him to single up on Jefferson later, since then it's back to passive zone, ya don't need to read anything to know Alexander dislikes Barry's defensive schemes.
why this is so hard for you to realize is regrettable
you put me on the defensive when you said you'd regret asking the question, and I went back and deleted the last line about 10 min before your post, because you already new about the vocal instance, seriously you had to remember how vocal Alex was after the first game last year, what has changed since then? nothing except he's been inactive for a month or more.BF004 wrote: ↑18 Dec 2023 15:55Sigh, why gotta be such a d and condescending? So pointless ever asking you a simple question and expecting it answered.Yoop wrote: ↑18 Dec 2023 15:44
and I have a feeling I'll regret answering you.
he pissed a bitch when Barry stuck him in his passive zones 28 games ago against Jefferson, and Barry allowed him to single up on Jefferson later, since then it's back to passive zone, ya don't need to read anything to know Alexander dislikes Barry's defensive schemes.
why this is so hard for you to realize is regrettable
Never implied I agreed or disagreed. Literally just asked where did you see Jaire being vocal about Barry, not sure what I’ve all seen and what I missed.
Why is it so damn hard to answer a question without being a $%&#.
Does it matter who at this point? I think it’s tough for these guys to go out there these last three games and play another down for this guy. I get it from both sides though.Madcity_matt wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 16:03As bad as he's been, who are you replacing him with in week 16?
Plus you don't have to #fireJoeBarry
Simply #don'tresignjoebarry
They go hand-in-hand. The leaderless locker room was a tinder box and the two bad losses with poor play on D were the spark to ignite it (my analogy is probably off but I trust people get what I'm saying).Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 16:45Many are blaming locker room mood
On Barry when in my opinion this stems from lack of player leadership in the locker room
Campbell is supposed to be the vet and he’s crying.
Jaire is the well paid vet and he’s sitting
Clark is a mime
Let’s face it, this fracture doesn’t start with Barry. It started when Gute shippe Rasul out of town. That nuked chemistry.
No fighters left
I didn't get that necessarily. He called out communication and then said it ultimately is his and the position coaches responsibility. His statement that said it isn't the best decision, TODAY, was a big shot across the DCs bow, in my opinion.APB wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 17:07It sounds to me like the players didn't appreciate MLF standing at the podium post-game and essentially saying the scheme and alignment decisions were fine, the mistakes were made by the players. Day 1 install mistakes, if I recall, and things like that.
MLF basically had the back of his DC at the expense of his players.
There's a level of toxicity brewing in the Packer locker room. There's no denying that. The danger here is how much longer are things going to be allowed to fester before action is taken. And what will that action be? Will it be Barry let go...or a player like Campbell who dares speak out?
This has the potential to get ugly.
“If I thought that was the best solution today, then we’d make that decision,”
https://www.packers.com/news/matt-lafle ... -right-now"When you're having basic communication problems and you're supposed to be in a certain coverage or a certain rotation and we're not getting that communication … it always starts with us," he said. "It starts with myself and it goes to all our assistant coaches. So obviously the coaching wasn't up to the standard and our performance on the field definitely showed that as well."
Who wears the green dot on defense?Pckfn23 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 17:09I didn't get that necessarily. He called out communication and then said it ultimately is his and the position coaches responsibility. His statement that said it isn't time to make that decision, YET, was a big shot across the DCs bow, in my opinion.APB wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 17:07It sounds to me like the players didn't appreciate MLF standing at the podium post-game and essentially saying the scheme and alignment decisions were fine, the mistakes were made by the players. Day 1 install mistakes, if I recall, and things like that.
MLF basically had the back of his DC at the expense of his players.
There's a level of toxicity brewing in the Packer locker room. There's no denying that. The danger here is how much longer are things going to be allowed to fester before action is taken. And what will that action be? Will it be Barry let go...or a player like Campbell who dares speak out?
This has the potential to get ugly.
Campbell or Walker. It has been both throughout the season depending on injury. Not sure about Sunday.APB wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 17:11Who wears the green dot on defense?Pckfn23 wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 17:09I didn't get that necessarily. He called out communication and then said it ultimately is his and the position coaches responsibility. His statement that said it isn't time to make that decision, YET, was a big shot across the DCs bow, in my opinion.APB wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 17:07It sounds to me like the players didn't appreciate MLF standing at the podium post-game and essentially saying the scheme and alignment decisions were fine, the mistakes were made by the players. Day 1 install mistakes, if I recall, and things like that.
MLF basically had the back of his DC at the expense of his players.
There's a level of toxicity brewing in the Packer locker room. There's no denying that. The danger here is how much longer are things going to be allowed to fester before action is taken. And what will that action be? Will it be Barry let go...or a player like Campbell who dares speak out?
This has the potential to get ugly.
Exactly.NCF wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 16:15Does it matter who at this point? I think it’s tough for these guys to go out there these last three games and play another down for this guy. I get it from both sides though.Madcity_matt wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 16:03As bad as he's been, who are you replacing him with in week 16?
Plus you don't have to #fireJoeBarry
Simply #don'tresignjoebarry
Potential? It is already. We're 6 and 8 with the 11th seed after losing winnable games to teams such as NY, Oakland, Atlanta, Denver and Pittsburgh. If we come out of the Bears game 9 and 8 ............ehhhhh Who am I kidding?APB wrote: ↑19 Dec 2023 17:07It sounds to me like the players didn't appreciate MLF standing at the podium post-game and essentially saying the scheme and alignment decisions were fine, the mistakes were made by the players. Day 1 install mistakes, if I recall, and things like that.
MLF basically had the back of his DC at the expense of his players.
There's a level of toxicity brewing in the Packer locker room. There's no denying that. The danger here is how much longer are things going to be allowed to fester before action is taken. And what will that action be? Will it be Barry let go...or a player like Campbell who dares speak out?
This has the potential to get ugly.
Yep. Sweep it under the rug. Move forward aimlessly. Sitting at 6 and 8 riding the storm out. It's a helluva way to run a front office and manage a coaching staff.
Who, exactly, are you referring to?