Page 142 of 161

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 00:12
by Drj820
The cool thing about my footer or tagline or whatever you call the message on the bottom of all my posts…is that it’s always true. We always need a new ST coordinator. Always.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 03:45
by lake shark
APB wrote:
19 Dec 2023 17:23
NCF wrote:
19 Dec 2023 16:15
Madcity_matt wrote:
19 Dec 2023 16:03
As bad as he's been, who are you replacing him with in week 16?

Plus you don't have to #fireJoeBarry

Simply #don'tresignjoebarry
Does it matter who at this point? I think it’s tough for these guys to go out there these last three games and play another down for this guy. I get it from both sides though.
Exactly.

Does it matter who you replace him with on an interim basis? If they suck, so be it. Joe does too.

What matters is accountability and the players clearly aren't seeing it from the HC. Letting JB ride out his contract clearly isn't sitting well with some players.
Maybe give Bisaccia a shot?

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 08:21
by RingoCStarrQB
lake shark wrote:
20 Dec 2023 03:45
APB wrote:
19 Dec 2023 17:23
NCF wrote:
19 Dec 2023 16:15


Does it matter who at this point? I think it’s tough for these guys to go out there these last three games and play another down for this guy. I get it from both sides though.
Exactly.

Does it matter who you replace him with on an interim basis? If they suck, so be it. Joe does too.

What matters is accountability and the players clearly aren't seeing it from the HC. Letting JB ride out his contract clearly isn't sitting well with some players.
Maybe give Bisaccia a shot?
Bring in Jim Leonard in the interim to run the defense. Then on January 8th, 2024 fire the entire coaching staff. Then elevate Jim Leonard to Head Coach.
Fire Gutey too.
Go Packers!

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 08:37
by Pckfn23

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 09:31
by go pak go
Wicks's feet are just so good. So crazy to see a guy who ran a 4.62 look so quick and successfull on the field.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 10:37
by Pckfn23

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 10:40
by Yoop
and folks act like I was crazy, a malcontent, for being upset these sorts of drafted receivers had been by passed since 2015 :rotf:

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 10:43
by Half Empty
I'll break my own for a minute. The first part of your statement = roger that. The second part = hih?

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 10:46
by go pak go
Half Empty wrote:
20 Dec 2023 10:43
I'll break my own for a minute. The first part of your statement = roger that. The second part = hih?
Josiah Deguara and Jace Sternberger do not count as intentional investments in the 3rd round because they were bad.

Tucker Kraft does count as an intentional investment in the 3rd round and qualifies as "see you should have listened to me" because he is good.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 10:46
by Labrev
meh, Heath is disposable. Jarrett Boykin.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 10:47
by go pak go
Labrev wrote:
20 Dec 2023 10:46
meh, Heath is disposable. Jarrett Boykin.
Yeah he's a UDFA.

I like our top 4 WRs. I think Doubs will slip to #4 next year. Still wouldn't hate taking a WR if one falls to us. Though I think the 2025 draft makes more sense timing wise.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 12:35
by NCF
go pak go wrote:
20 Dec 2023 10:46
Half Empty wrote:
20 Dec 2023 10:43
I'll break my own for a minute. The first part of your statement = roger that. The second part = hih?
Josiah Deguara and Jace Sternberger do not count as intentional investments in the 3rd round because they were bad.

Tucker Kraft does count as an intentional investment in the 3rd round and qualifies as "see you should have listened to me" because he is good.
Yep. The effort was there. The results...

Image

Image

Image

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 13:00
by Yoop
Half Empty wrote:
20 Dec 2023 10:43
I'll break my own for a minute. The first part of your statement = roger that. The second part = hih?
:thwap:

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 13:03
by Yoop
Labrev wrote:
20 Dec 2023 10:46
meh, Heath is disposable. Jarrett Boykin.
same words where used to describe Double D, not saying Heath would ever have that kind of production, however he brings intangibles, big body, smack down blocking, and a nastiness you adore, till we improve on a player like him, just let him play

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 14:13
by Labrev
Yoop wrote:
20 Dec 2023 13:03
Labrev wrote:
20 Dec 2023 10:46
meh, Heath is disposable. Jarrett Boykin.
same words where used to describe Double D, not saying Heath would ever have that kind of production, however he brings intangibles, big body, smack down blocking, and a nastiness you adore, till we improve on a player like him, just let him play
For every 1 Driver success story there are 100 nondescript Jarrett Boykins. Not only does his athletic numbers mirror Boykin's, that's who he looks like on the field far more than DD.

There is no need to replace him now, but you can find as good or better in any UDFA pool, and upgrade easily with just a Day 3 pick.

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 15:14
by Acrobat
Pckfn23 wrote:
20 Dec 2023 10:37
And most likely our next RB will be even younger (and paired with Jones next year).

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 20 Dec 2023 21:12
by BF004


And he’s still got a couple two tree games left

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 21 Dec 2023 13:23
by Pckfn23

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 24 Dec 2023 16:35
by Pckfn23

Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023

Posted: 24 Dec 2023 16:43
by MY_TAKE
Pckfn23 wrote:
24 Dec 2023 16:35
which is why the performances against the giants and bucs was so sad and annoying as a fan. After the Lions and Chiefs game I had them in the playoffs. Now, they no longer control their own destiny and that always sucks and seems like a longshot despite the so-called 62% percent chance. :thwap: