Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:18
MN lost D players to injury today.
Packers Huddle
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Page 17 of 18
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:18
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:19
Young had several games with a completion % > 75%, but his previous yardage high was 247, and he only had one game with more than one TD pass, so I'd say they did a pretty good job of living up to the "play the Pack and have a career day" image.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:21
How many yards did Young have today?Half Empty wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 15:19Young had several games with a completion % > 75%, but his previous yardage high was 247, and he only had one game with more than one TD pass, so I'd say they did a pretty good job of living up to the "play the Pack and have a career day" image.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:22
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:23
The Seahawks and Rams won.
If the 49ers have the 1 seed locked up by week 18, GB very well might not make it in at 9-8
If the 49ers have the 1 seed locked up by week 18, GB very well might not make it in at 9-8
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:25
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:29
312Pugger wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 15:21How many yards did Young have today?Half Empty wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 15:19Young had several games with a completion % > 75%, but his previous yardage high was 247, and he only had one game with more than one TD pass, so I'd say they did a pretty good job of living up to the "play the Pack and have a career day" image.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:32
OMG.Half Empty wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 15:29312Pugger wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 15:21How many yards did Young have today?Half Empty wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 15:19Young had several games with a completion % > 75%, but his previous yardage high was 247, and he only had one game with more than one TD pass, so I'd say they did a pretty good job of living up to the "play the Pack and have a career day" image.
If MLF doesn't kick Barry to the curb we all better start calling for HIS head.Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 15:39
Love absolutely carried the team today. Threw some clutch dimes and daggers down the stretch.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 16:33
So Barry is a really bad D-coordinator, that, we all know or believe to be true. I am starting to believe that our defensive position coaches must be sub par also. I am also wondering if I my expectations of the actual players that have been drafted (in many cases quite high), are just not as good as I expect them to be.
I really don't know. Getting rid of Barry will be addition by subtraction, but I dont know that GB becomes a top 10 defense next year with someone else at the helm. I hope they do.
I really don't know. Getting rid of Barry will be addition by subtraction, but I dont know that GB becomes a top 10 defense next year with someone else at the helm. I hope they do.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 16:39
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 16:39
I think we have a good front 7 on defense.MY_TAKE wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 16:33So Barry is a really bad D-coordinator, that, we all know or believe to be true. I am starting to believe that our defensive position coaches must be sub par also. I am also wondering if I my expectations of the actual players that have been drafted (in many cases quite high), are just not as good as I expect them to be.
I really don't know. Getting rid of Barry will be addition by subtraction, but I dont know that GB becomes a top 10 defense next year with someone else at the helm. I hope they do.
Alexander is playing very bad ball this year. Stokes is leaning towards bust after his rookie year (especially with the injury now).
The rest of the secondary are literally just guys. The big thing moving forward from a coaching standpoint is Quay Walker. He can still sway either way and that direction of that sway will go a long ways on the future of this defense.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 16:40
I mean one leads to the other, right?
The first couple years in the league of molding raw talent with notable flashes into a consistently-performing NFL player are huge and rely on position coaches to develop that talent.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 16:57
We say just guys then look at Carolinas d. They are top 5 in the league and they are full of jags. Yes they have a few really good guys but their DC puts them in position to freaking succeed. They believe what he is selling. He shoulda been out DC.
I honestly believe overall we have more talent on our d overall but Carolina plays as a unit
And OMG
is jaire playing like a bish.
I honestly believe overall we have more talent on our d overall but Carolina plays as a unit
And OMG
is jaire playing like a bish.Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 17:08
F-22. What's your prediction for next Sunday night?
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 17:23
It wasn’t perfect. The opening drive to start the second half was pretty pathetic.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 15:39Love absolutely carried the team today. Threw some clutch dimes and daggers down the stretch.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 17:26
Top 5 in the league? Idk, if that's true then I think it is due to their opponents taking their foot off the gas in the 2nd half because they are up 21-0 or whatever. Except us of course, we make any game a shootout.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 16:57We say just guys then look at Carolinas d. They are top 5 in the league and they are full of jags. Yes they have a few really good guys but their DC puts them in position to freaking succeed. They believe what he is selling. He shoulda been out DC.
I honestly believe overall we have more talent on our d overall but Carolina plays as a unit
And OMG
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 17:27
tbh we were better in the secondary with Valentine/Ballentine than with Jaire/Sucksgo pak go wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 16:39I think we have a good front 7 on defense.MY_TAKE wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 16:33So Barry is a really bad D-coordinator, that, we all know or believe to be true. I am starting to believe that our defensive position coaches must be sub par also. I am also wondering if I my expectations of the actual players that have been drafted (in many cases quite high), are just not as good as I expect them to be.
I really don't know. Getting rid of Barry will be addition by subtraction, but I dont know that GB becomes a top 10 defense next year with someone else at the helm. I hope they do.
Alexander is playing very bad ball this year. Stokes is leaning towards bust after his rookie year (especially with the injury now).
The rest of the secondary are literally just guys. The big thing moving forward from a coaching standpoint is Quay Walker. He can still sway either way and that direction of that sway will go a long ways on the future of this defense.
Re: Packers @ Panthers GDT: Sunday, Dec. 24th, 12:00 PM CST
Posted: 24 Dec 2023 17:30
When the defensive scheme is so soft and the players are all running around like chickens with their heads chopped how can we tell how good or bad they are. It's ridiculous.MY_TAKE wrote: ↑24 Dec 2023 16:33So Barry is a really bad D-coordinator, that, we all know or believe to be true. I am starting to believe that our defensive position coaches must be sub par also. I am also wondering if I my expectations of the actual players that have been drafted (in many cases quite high), are just not as good as I expect them to be.
I really don't know. Getting rid of Barry will be addition by subtraction, but I dont know that GB becomes a top 10 defense next year with someone else at the helm. I hope they do.