Packers Huddle

NCF wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 08:22

I hate myself for this, but...

I noticed a few tabloids popping up on Twitter mentioning Rodgers and Shailene were on the outs. No reputable Packers sources ran with it, but fiancé's absence was noticeable, to me, and Rodgers didn't utter a single word about her.

I would normally say "keep that stuff out of here" but I have noticed that Rodgers does seem to be heavily influenced by the women he dates. I even wondered if she had a big part in his vaccine decision since she's an all natural/organic type.

Acrobat wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 09:34

NCF wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 08:22

I hate myself for this, but...

I noticed a few tabloids popping up on Twitter mentioning Rodgers and Shailene were on the outs. No reputable Packers sources ran with it, but fiancé's absence was noticeable, to me, and Rodgers didn't utter a single word about her.

I would normally say "keep that stuff out of here" but I have noticed that Rodgers does seem to be heavily influenced by the women he dates. I even wondered if she had a big part in his vaccine decision since she's an all natural/organic type.

you say keep that out of here...and then you add in the bomb of vaccine chatter. (i am saying this jokingly, but that is funny!!)

I really think Rodgers would have come to that decision on his own though.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 09:37

Acrobat wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 09:34

NCF wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 08:22

I hate myself for this, but...

I noticed a few tabloids popping up on Twitter mentioning Rodgers and Shailene were on the outs. No reputable Packers sources ran with it, but fiancé's absence was noticeable, to me, and Rodgers didn't utter a single word about her.

I would normally say "keep that stuff out of here" but I have noticed that Rodgers does seem to be heavily influenced by the women he dates. I even wondered if she had a big part in his vaccine decision since she's an all natural/organic type.

you say keep that out of here...and then you add in the bomb of vaccine chatter. (i am saying this jokingly, but that is funny!!)

I really think Rodgers would have come to that decision on his own though.

Haha, more of an example of how I think he lets himself get influenced by the ladies.

The word of many outlets is definitely that Rodgers speech did shift the odds further away from GB. I didn‘t watch it (who cares about a regular season MVP, for me the real season is the postseason), it was probably just another one of those „empty“ speeches, yada, yada, yada. I doubt though you can derive conclusions.

German_Panzer wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 16:40

The word of many outlets is definitely that Rodgers speech did shift the odds further away from GB. I didn‘t watch it (who cares about a regular season MVP, for me the real season is the postseason), it was probably just another one of those „empty“ speeches, yada, yada, yada. I doubt though you can derive conclusions.

I didn't see it but from what I heard it is still up in the air what he does.

German_Panzer wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 16:40

The word of many outlets is definitely that Rodgers speech did shift the odds further away from GB. I didn‘t watch it (who cares about a regular season MVP, for me the real season is the postseason), it was probably just another one of those „empty“ speeches, yada, yada, yada. I doubt though you can derive conclusions.

Well, if the speech shifted odds of him playing elsewhere, the speech is potentially relevant? So maybe you should watch it if you want to understand these 'media outlet words' you are referencing? That you are also commenting on?

Seems like you are going out of your way to tell us you are intentionally remaining underinformed to comment on this topic, yet commenting anyways.

I don’t know, I came away from the special feeling like he’s a guy that really likes Green Bay now.

Acrobat wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 10:44

Drj820 wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 09:37

Acrobat wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 09:34

I would normally say "keep that stuff out of here" but I have noticed that Rodgers does seem to be heavily influenced by the women he dates. I even wondered if she had a big part in his vaccine decision since she's an all natural/organic type.

you say keep that out of here...and then you add in the bomb of vaccine chatter. (i am saying this jokingly, but that is funny!!)

I really think Rodgers would have come to that decision on his own though.

Haha, more of an example of how I think he lets himself get influenced by the ladies.

We should influence the guys.

I gotta say I thought she was "different". I just didn't see the attraction - I never thought she was all that pretty.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 08:58

i thought the speech was on point. He honored the dead and also gave HUGE props to Lacoach, as well as even mentioned his former enemies by name in Mark and Brian. Classy.

And this makes me believe that if Ball and company can do some creative accounting Rodgers is coming back for one more try at this. We shall see...

BF004 wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 18:28

German_Panzer wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2022 16:40

The word of many outlets is definitely that Rodgers speech did shift the odds further away from GB. I didn‘t watch it (who cares about a regular season MVP, for me the real season is the postseason), it was probably just another one of those „empty“ speeches, yada, yada, yada. I doubt though you can derive conclusions.

Well, if the speech shifted odds of him playing elsewhere, the speech is potentially relevant? So maybe you should watch it if you want to understand these 'media outlet words' you are referencing? That you are also commenting on?

Seems like you are going out of your way to tell us you are intentionally remaining underinformed to comment on this topic, yet commenting anyways.

Just wanted to pass word. No more, no less, no Rodgers?

I want him gone.

Denver is my guess.

Ghost_Lombardi wrote: ↑

12 Feb 2022 09:38

I want him gone.

Denver is my guess.

I want the draft and free agency to finish. I want the 2022 schedule to be announced. I want the 2022 regular season to start. And I want to be at Lambeau Field when Leroy Butler's Lambeau Field Hall of Fame event occurs and his name is unveiled in the inner sanctum to a standing ovation. I want Dilweg, Lewellen, Howton, Gillingham and Sharpe to be elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

I want I want I want I want I want ..........

I want to have fun this off-season and next season and all the seasons thereafter.

Ian can't even give us Super Bowl Sunday.

This either really know they need him or they are really worried about being blamed for shipping him off

I just wish they’d have waited until AFTER the SB to start all this contract speculation nonsense. All these SB Sunday tweets do is feed into the Rodgers-needs-attention narrative that isn’t being driven by Rodgers at all.

APB wrote: ↑

13 Feb 2022 09:28

I just wish they’d have waited until AFTER the SB to start all this contract speculation nonsense. All these SB Sunday tweets do is feed into the Rodgers-needs-attention narrative that isn’t being driven by Rodgers at all.

Seems like we’ve had tons of nfl news over past couple weeks and not much of it has anything to do with the super bowl. Game lacks buzz.