The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Yeah I just can't see him making any money this offseason. Certainly a good bottom roster guy. Could certainly have worse as a backup boundary corner.
have you consumed the basting sherrygo pak go wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 09:08Yeah I just can't see him making any money this offseason. Certainly a good bottom roster guy. Could certainly have worse as a backup boundary corner.
But this guy's availability history alone to me makes him no more than a $2.5 million guy. He is now going on 1 of 5 years in the league being healthy.
King misses a lot of games but healthy is a pretty good CB, thats why we paid 6 mil. for him this year, I think he'll get close to that againWe paid 6 million because we inexplicably bid against ourselves. He wasn't worth that on the open market as evidenced by similar deals and he won't sniff close to that this year. He is essentially a minimum salary guy from here on out.
Me being the BG "bootlicker", I am going to have disagree with you. The Packers overapaid and this season is once again showing they overpaid. It was a bad move.Yoop wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 09:26have you consumed the basting sherrygo pak go wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 09:08Yeah I just can't see him making any money this offseason. Certainly a good bottom roster guy. Could certainly have worse as a backup boundary corner.
But this guy's availability history alone to me makes him no more than a $2.5 million guy. He is now going on 1 of 5 years in the league being healthy.
we'll see, I'am thinking he'll get 4 mil. open market, he has played better then fans think, two years ago he had 5 picks. PFF gave him top grades for several games this year, availability is a issue, but teams will put up with a player missing a few games a season as long as they do well when they do play.
He's horrifically inconsistent. That's the only thing about him that has stayed the same. You're not wrong that he has shown himself capable of playing some top games, but it's not like he plays well when healthy and then gets hurt a lot. He plays well sometimes. He plays terribly sometimes. AND he's not super available.Yoop wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 10:48we'll see, I'am thinking he'll get 4 mil. open market, he has played better then fans think, two years ago he had 5 picks. PFF gave him top grades for several games this year, availability is a issue, but teams will put up with a player missing a few games a season as long as they do well when they do play.
I think some of that inconsistency is do to playing less then 100%, he had a back issue and played in that PO game against Tampa, and we play him at less then 100% because he's still the 3rd best corner we have.YoHoChecko wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 11:31He's horrifically inconsistent. That's the only thing about him that has stayed the same. You're not wrong that he has shown himself capable of playing some top games, but it's not like he plays well when healthy and then gets hurt a lot. He plays well sometimes. He plays terribly sometimes. AND he's not super available.Yoop wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 10:48we'll see, I'am thinking he'll get 4 mil. open market, he has played better then fans think, two years ago he had 5 picks. PFF gave him top grades for several games this year, availability is a issue, but teams will put up with a player missing a few games a season as long as they do well when they do play.
He's a gamble every time he's on the field, not just a gamble as to whether or not he'll be on the field. He has been as often bad as he has been good throughout his career. He is not worth the $5-6 million we gave him this year. He should not have received it. And he will not receive it moving forward.
But yeah, $3-4 mil isn't out of the question.
But he's not better than fans think. If anything, fans didn't notice how unreliable he is until he epically flamed out in the NFCCG last year, literally costing us the game with his poor play. But several people have been aware for years that he just isn't that high-caliber of a QB.
( I stole that one) but we could do worse for the money he'll cost to bring back.How many ads are you seeing? I usually see one at the bottom of the screen but I ignore it. Were you reading the Packers subforum or the General? There is one guy on there who is worried about us facing a rested Rams team and that D line of theirs. He is kinda negative but perhaps he does that so he doesn't get his hopes up?APB wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 08:06Slightly off topic.
Just went to the FF forum to see what the chatter was about for this week’s matchup. Haven’t been on there in some time.
For those of you who frequent that site, is there an inside joke I’m missing? The insufferable negativity was impressive in its own right. I almost got the impression they were working some collective reverse psychology angle in order to will the Packers to a win this week. Then I kept reading and realized it wasn’t.
I mean, egads, this forum has its share of Negative Nancy’s but nothing close to what I saw there. And then to suffer through all the advertisements to boot?
No thanks. I’ll keep her parked right here. I’ll take this bunch of Richard Simmons wannabe’s over that crew any day.
Anyway, thought it worth sharing. Now back to your regularly scheduled conversation…
This is going to be a challenge facing a well rested good team while we are pretty beat up. I hope MLF has a plan to help keep Donald out of Rodgers' face.Football's Future. It is a large football forum with subforums for every team. It is interesting to read what fans of other teams are thinking about their team and ours. The Packers subforum has more posts than the other teams' subforums combined.go pak go wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 09:05What is the FF Forum?APB wrote: ↑25 Nov 2021 08:06Slightly off topic.
Just went to the FF forum to see what the chatter was about for this week’s matchup. Haven’t been on there in some time.
For those of you who frequent that site, is there an inside joke I’m missing? The insufferable negativity was impressive in its own right. I almost got the impression they were working some collective reverse psychology angle in order to will the Packers to a win this week. Then I kept reading and realized it wasn’t.
I mean, egads, this forum has its share of Negative Nancy’s but nothing close to what I saw there. And then to suffer through all the advertisements to boot?
No thanks. I’ll keep her parked right here. I’ll take this bunch of Richard Simmons wannabe’s over that crew any day.
Anyway, thought it worth sharing. Now back to your regularly scheduled conversation…
JB caught a lot of flack early in the season, which he probably deserved. Seems like our defense has found some gel these past few games.APB wrote: ↑27 Nov 2021 07:36Really interested to see how Joe Barry schemes against this Rams offense. Yes, Stafford was not a part of the Rams offense while Joe was there but the offense itself has not changed much. I would think Joe has some pretty good ideas on how to attack and defend against his old team despite the injuries we now absorbed.
