Page 22 of 27

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:13
by go pak go
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:11
Cdragon wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:10
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:10
Awful decision. Not even remotely open.
Way too late with that ball.
Didn't have the initial time to get it to him because of the rush, but I think he had determined the throw after he avoided the rush and as you say, late.
Did he have room to run? I felt he should have run it watching Live.

Man those drops by Doubs and Musgrave were just brutal.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:13
by Pugger
musclestang wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:10
Late and short, Love was pretty bad tonight and there’s no way around it.
Yes, his passes are too late and behind his receivers. Donno if that can be fixed or not.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:14
by Pckfn23
Gotta put this one squarely on Love and LaFleur.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:14
by williewasgreat
Really ugly offensive performance. Poor day for Love and receivers. Also, bad job by MLF coordinating this offense.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:15
by go pak go
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:14
Gotta put this one squarely on Love and LaFleur.
Yeah MLF is not impressing with this young group. And Jordan isn't showing any growth. I thought this was a great opportunity for him to have a nice 2:00 comeback win.

Defense played pretty well. Couple of frustrating drives but overall happy with their play.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:15
by Pckfn23
go pak go wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:13
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:11
Cdragon wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:10


Way too late with that ball.
Didn't have the initial time to get it to him because of the rush, but I think he had determined the throw after he avoided the rush and as you say, late.
Did he have room to run? I felt he should have run it watching Live.

Man those drops by Doubs and Musgrave were just brutal.
No, 3 defenders between him and the first.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:16
by Crazylegs Starks
:puke: :censored:

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:16
by Drj820
I think you gotta put it on Lafleur, because once you see your first year starting qb is off..you shouldn’t keep asking him to throw deep balls or pretend he’s not off. Coach around it.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:16
by go pak go
Our offensive line is starting to its weakness too.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:16
by MY_TAKE
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:14
Gotta put this one squarely on Love and LaFleur.
completely agree

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:17
by paco
Tear it down. Everyone is a cancer.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:18
by Drj820
Just realized the Matt Lafleur offense is Aaron rodgers

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:18
by texas
Drj820 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 20:55
texas wrote:
09 Oct 2023 20:50
Drj820 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 20:47


It’s only a rebuilding year because the product is putrid. The roster is good enough to be 3-2 after tonight
No that's totally wrong, it's a rebuilding year because the front office kept kicking the can down the road while trying to win one last time with Rodgers. All our cap hell is pinned on this season, and then they also cut a lot of the veteran guys and holdovers while committing to playing the young guys who they may have otherwise eased in more slowly.

Definitely a rebuilding year. The writing was on the wall going into the season, but we thought (and I still do think) that despite that, the team is good enough to make the playoffs. Could easily win this game, but if we don't, then we're still 2-3 and there is a long season ahead.
Guess it comes down to what it came down to in the off-season…what’s your definition of rebuilding year?

Are we Super Bowl contenders..No

Should a team with 8 first rounders on d compete for a playoff spot? Yes in my opinion.

Rebuilding to me is bottom 1/4 of league, so a top 8 draft pick.

This team should be way better than that.
Yeah, I don't think we're bottom 8, so not that bad of a rebuild. But all of the decisions made by the front office resulted in taking our lumps this year (as opposed to previous years or future years). So it is clear to me that to the extent we needed to pay the piper, they deliberately chose this year to do it.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:18
by bud fox
go pak go wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:13
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:11
Cdragon wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:10


Way too late with that ball.
Didn't have the initial time to get it to him because of the rush, but I think he had determined the throw after he avoided the rush and as you say, late.
Did he have room to run? I felt he should have run it watching Live.

Man those drops by Doubs and Musgrave were just brutal.
Musgrave pass was behind him.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:20
by APB
The entire offense stunk it up tonight. Some of you can continue to harp solely on Love, and he wasn’t good by any means, but from MLF on down, it was a &%$@ show.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:21
by Pugger
go pak go wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:15
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:14
Gotta put this one squarely on Love and LaFleur.
Yeah MLF is not impressing with this young group. And Jordan isn't showing any growth. I thought this was a great opportunity for him to have a nice 2:00 comeback win.

Defense played pretty well. Couple of frustrating drives but overall happy with their play.
Do QBs show a lot of growth after 6 starts? On that last drive his receivers did him no favors.

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:21
by texas
Love could have played better but I didn't see any sort of regression since he has about 2 terrible throws per game, and that's about what he had tonight (1 of which didn't result in an INT).

MLF needs to do better designing a Shanahan/McVay offense. We're missing pieces but this is still more anemic than he should be putting out there.

We could really use more good RBs. This offense is completely different without Aaron Jones. Dillon just doesn't cut it, although he had a nice drive there in the 3rd quarter.

WRs sucked today

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:22
by go pak go
bud fox wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:18
go pak go wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:13
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:11


Didn't have the initial time to get it to him because of the rush, but I think he had determined the throw after he avoided the rush and as you say, late.
Did he have room to run? I felt he should have run it watching Live.

Man those drops by Doubs and Musgrave were just brutal.
Musgrave pass was behind him.
It was a drop

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:22
by Drj820
APB wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:20
The entire offense stunk it up tonight. Some of you can continue to harp solely on Love, and he wasn’t good by any means, but from MLF on down, it was a &%$@ show.
Which is why after having 11 days to prepare…when no one is ready…you blame the coach

Re: Packers @ Raiders GDT: Monday, Oct 9th, 7:15pm CST

Posted: 09 Oct 2023 22:22
by Pckfn23
bud fox wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:18
go pak go wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:13
Pckfn23 wrote:
09 Oct 2023 22:11


Didn't have the initial time to get it to him because of the rush, but I think he had determined the throw after he avoided the rush and as you say, late.
Did he have room to run? I felt he should have run it watching Live.

Man those drops by Doubs and Musgrave were just brutal.
Musgrave pass was behind him.
Had to be because of the closing LB.