Packers Huddle

I don't think we had to really on him. I think he took it.

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:35

I don't think we had to really on him. I think he took it.

then i guess you arent concerned about the position group week one, i am!

Billy Turner also out of practice with a knee injury, no details;

injury bug hitting our weakest starting positions at a bad time.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:39

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:35

I don't think we had to really on him. I think he took it.

then i guess you arent concerned about the position group week one, i am!

I was bummed when Kamal Martin was out because I was excited that we have a hot young rookie who needs snaps and looks to be a steal for us.

I am now concerned because the Replacement 1 (Raven Greene) and Replacement 2 (Oren Burks) are also not practicing.

But that is more of a multiple injuries at a position rather than relying on a single player.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:39

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:35

I don't think we had to really on him. I think he took it.

then i guess you arent concerned about the position group week one, i am!

With Raven Greene, Oren Burks, and now Martin out. Yes I am a bit concerned. That doesn't mean I believe we were relying on Martin.

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:53

Drj820 wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:39

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:35

I don't think we had to really on him. I think he took it.

then i guess you arent concerned about the position group week one, i am!

With Raven Greene, Oren Burks, and now Martin out. Yes I am a bit concerned. That doesn't mean I believe we were relying on Martin.

Burks was back at practice today.

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 14:41

Billy Turner also out of practice with a knee injury, no details;

injury bug hitting our weakest starting positions at a bad time.

Best thing that could happen to the team. I think they are unawares that Turner stinks.

Let me go on the record and say -- at risk of eating crow later -- that I am still a Burks skeptic. I have also been a Jackson skeptic but I could see him turning it around and am 50/50 on it. Burks, though? Nope, not getting fooled by the positive offseason reviews for one for 1 second.

Labrev wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 17:38

Let me go on the record and say -- at risk of eating crow later -- that I am still a Burks skeptic. I have also been a Jackson skeptic but I could see him turning it around and am 50/50 on it. Burks, though? Nope, not getting fooled by the positive offseason reviews for one for 1 second.

I am the same. I could see Jackson finding a very valuable niche, just can’t see it for Burks.

Labrev wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 17:38

Let me go on the record and say -- at risk of eating crow later -- that I am still a Burks skeptic. I have also been a Jackson skeptic but I could see him turning it around and am 50/50 on it. Burks, though? Nope, not getting fooled by the positive offseason reviews for one for 1 second.

I don't think the offseason reviews of Burks have been all that positive. Is it progress from last year? Absolutely.

But it was pretty evident he was backup to Martin and honestly fighting for the backup role with Summers.

But right now....we just need a body. Period.

go pak go wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 18:51

Labrev wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2020 17:38

Let me go on the record and say -- at risk of eating crow later -- that I am still a Burks skeptic. I have also been a Jackson skeptic but I could see him turning it around and am 50/50 on it. Burks, though? Nope, not getting fooled by the positive offseason reviews for one for 1 second.

I don't think the offseason reviews of Burks have been all that positive. Is it progress from last year? Absolutely.

But it was pretty evident he was backup to Martin and honestly fighting for the backup role with Summers.

But right now....we just need a body. Period.

Hope that body is Bolton back bc burks is blah.

This guy is such a good follow...

NCF wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2020 09:55

This guy is such a good follow...

But, all for naught.

Packers working out a couple of vet WR's.

So much talent. I loved him in that Draft, but man, that is some bad injury history.

I would be very interested in Sanu.

Vet with familiarity in the offense.



However, short of it winning us the super bowl, which is incredibly doubtful. Looking like a very good decision to not get Sanders, Sanu or Robbie Anderson.

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2020 10:55

I would be very interested in Sanu.

Vet with familiarity in the offense.



However, short of it winning us the super bowl, which is incredibly doubtful. Looking like a very good decision to not get Sanders, Sanu or Robbie Anderson.

Sanu is done.

lupedafiasco wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2020 13:27

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2020 10:55

I would be very interested in Sanu.

Vet with familiarity in the offense.



However, short of it winning us the super bowl, which is incredibly doubtful. Looking like a very good decision to not get Sanders, Sanu or Robbie Anderson.

Sanu is done.

How old is he? He’s never had a major injury, has he? At least not in the past several years. Just deteriorated skills?

NCF wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2020 13:31

lupedafiasco wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2020 13:27

BF004 wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2020 10:55

I would be very interested in Sanu.

Vet with familiarity in the offense.



However, short of it winning us the super bowl, which is incredibly doubtful. Looking like a very good decision to not get Sanders, Sanu or Robbie Anderson.

Sanu is done.

How old is he? He’s never had a major injury, has he? At least not in the past several years. Just deteriorated skills?

31. His game was all strength and muscle. Guys like that don’t last because they didn’t have the speed to begin with. Now he’s omega-slow.