Packers Huddle

Yoop wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 07:35

APB wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 07:06

Yoop wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 06:24

please spare me your bloviated tripe, most of the shareholders agree with the decision the FO makes, and right now there waiting on Rodgers to make a decision, why? because they know going with Love is a 50/50 proposition. obviously you don't know that, just like you don't know what Rodgers wants, quit acting as though you do.

I have no idea why you felt the need to respond like that. You're dismissive, insulting, and condescending all because someone else had the nerve to voice their opinion.

You wonder why you have such a hard time getting along with other members? It's because of your need to treat people exactly as you did here without provocation.

BS, I made a joke that wasn't meant as literal, and he took it as truth, Rodgers doesn't run this team any more then you or Skeptic or I do, and every comment he makes is to degrade Rodgers and act as though Love is the 3rd coming, every post.

Labrev wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 11:25

Reports are Jets may be putting feelers out on Lamar Jackson.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/nf ... a1eb3235ce

I think with Carr as a FA and Rodgers taking his time, I'm thinking the trade comp for Rodgers will not be as high as initially expected, especially if Lamar turns out to be get-able. If I am most teams, I probably prefer Jackson to Rodgers for a number of reasons (and Jets fans on social media seem to feel the same, per the article).

Though I wonder if maybe that opens up Baltimore as another potential landing spot for 12.

“As of right now, I’m convinced — based on my own instincts and knowing the NFL and knowing what happens after all these defeats and discussions with someone who has firsthand knowledge of this organization, of the Packers’ internal debates — that they are done with Rodgers. That’s the way it is right now, that he’s not coming back. They’re disgusted with him and they’re done with him and they’re moving on. This is going to involve money and a trade partner and all kinds of things. But I’m totally convinced he is not going to be their starting quarterback this year. On the other hand, they love Jordan Love. They think he’s the second coming now. They’ve seen enough in practice for three years, that they believe he is like Rodgers 2.0. That’s where this organization is coming from right now. They have turned the page, just like they did to Favre in June and July, those months in the summer of 2008 and I don’t see it changing.

“Even if Rodgers comes back to collect that $59 million, I think he’s the backup. He could try to ruin the whole operation. But he knows that’s not going to happen and he’s going to accept a trade somewhere. He knows he can’t live with that, with the Packers’ fans and everybody. It’s Love’s turn. The organization’s going that way. And that’s the way it is. This is everybody, I’m told. This is Murphy. This is LaFleur. This is Gutekunst. This is the whole shooting match. They’ve turned the page. They don’t see Rodgers as a guy who’s really working hard anymore. They see a guy who — when he reported this year — his body wasn’t as so-called ‘tight’ and strong as it was. They see a guy who blew off the offseason last year. … They’re done. It’s a hard guy to be done with.”

Labrev wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 14:17

^ Seems rather sensational. I can buy that some in the org prefer to move on, but doubt it's that final and across the board.

wizard 87 wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 13:52

Our Old buddy Bob McGinn posted this a few minutes ago...

“As of right now, I’m convinced — based on my own instincts and knowing the NFL and knowing what happens after all these defeats and discussions with someone who has firsthand knowledge of this organization, of the Packers’ internal debates — that they are done with Rodgers. That’s the way it is right now, that he’s not coming back. They’re disgusted with him and they’re done with him and they’re moving on. This is going to involve money and a trade partner and all kinds of things. But I’m totally convinced he is not going to be their starting quarterback this year. On the other hand, they love Jordan Love. They think he’s the second coming now. They’ve seen enough in practice for three years, that they believe he is like Rodgers 2.0. That’s where this organization is coming from right now. They have turned the page, just like they did to Favre in June and July, those months in the summer of 2008 and I don’t see it changing.

“Even if Rodgers comes back to collect that $59 million, I think he’s the backup. He could try to ruin the whole operation. But he knows that’s not going to happen and he’s going to accept a trade somewhere. He knows he can’t live with that, with the Packers’ fans and everybody. It’s Love’s turn. The organization’s going that way. And that’s the way it is. This is everybody, I’m told. This is Murphy. This is LaFleur. This is Gutekunst. This is the whole shooting match. They’ve turned the page. They don’t see Rodgers as a guy who’s really working hard anymore. They see a guy who — when he reported this year — his body wasn’t as so-called ‘tight’ and strong as it was. They see a guy who blew off the offseason last year. … They’re done. It’s a hard guy to be done with.”

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 15:31

A little more smoke on the not putting in the work speculation.

wizard 87 wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 15:17

FYI, the report is part of Tyler Dunne's network, I can tell everyone here with 100% certainty that Dunne still has a legit connection inside the offices in GB. I believe Yoho may remember that connection as well.

Don't blow this off like some of you like to do because it doesn't meet the narrative you want, If McGinn is using that connection it's more than hearsay.

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 15:08

wizard 87 wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 13:52

Our Old buddy Bob McGinn posted this a few minutes ago...

“As of right now, I’m convinced — based on my own instincts and knowing the NFL and knowing what happens after all these defeats and discussions with someone who has firsthand knowledge of this organization, of the Packers’ internal debates — that they are done with Rodgers. That’s the way it is right now, that he’s not coming back. They’re disgusted with him and they’re done with him and they’re moving on. This is going to involve money and a trade partner and all kinds of things. But I’m totally convinced he is not going to be their starting quarterback this year. On the other hand, they love Jordan Love. They think he’s the second coming now. They’ve seen enough in practice for three years, that they believe he is like Rodgers 2.0. That’s where this organization is coming from right now. They have turned the page, just like they did to Favre in June and July, those months in the summer of 2008 and I don’t see it changing.

“Even if Rodgers comes back to collect that $59 million, I think he’s the backup. He could try to ruin the whole operation. But he knows that’s not going to happen and he’s going to accept a trade somewhere. He knows he can’t live with that, with the Packers’ fans and everybody. It’s Love’s turn. The organization’s going that way. And that’s the way it is. This is everybody, I’m told. This is Murphy. This is LaFleur. This is Gutekunst. This is the whole shooting match. They’ve turned the page. They don’t see Rodgers as a guy who’s really working hard anymore. They see a guy who — when he reported this year — his body wasn’t as so-called ‘tight’ and strong as it was. They see a guy who blew off the offseason last year. … They’re done. It’s a hard guy to be done with.”

Thanks for pulling this story

Since it's 2023 and it's a McGinn opinion piece, I'm going to assume the exact opposite is true

Yoop wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 16:02

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 15:08

Thanks for pulling this story

Since it's 2023 and it's a McGinn opinion piece, I'm going to assume the exact opposite is true

I'am under the influence of past negative opinion pieces from Bobby lately too, first thought was the same as yours, Rodgers will be back nudging the back side of Myers or whomever our center is

but then he also could be spot on, theres never really a middle ground with McGinn

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 16:11

Yoop wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 16:02

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 15:08

Thanks for pulling this story

Since it's 2023 and it's a McGinn opinion piece, I'm going to assume the exact opposite is true

I'am under the influence of past negative opinion pieces from Bobby lately too, first thought was the same as yours, Rodgers will be back nudging the back side of Myers or whomever our center is

but then he also could be spot on, theres never really a middle ground with McGinn

Oh my gosh, did we just find common ground?

Yoop wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 16:02

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 15:08

wizard 87 wrote: ↑

17 Feb 2023 13:52

Our Old buddy Bob McGinn posted this a few minutes ago...

Thanks for pulling this story

Since it's 2023 and it's a McGinn opinion piece, I'm going to assume the exact opposite is true

I'am under the influence of past negative opinion pieces from Bobby lately too, first thought was the same as yours, Rodgers will be back nudging the back side of Myers or whomever our center is

Rodgers didn't appear to put the work in with the skipping the OTA's, true, so much has been made of not spending off season time with the rookie receivers, no one will let that go by, and Lafleur is the guy that kept him out of PS games, so I think some of this stuff is somewhat based on Rodgers age and the interest of McGinn and Dune to trade him and start fresh with Love