Page 28 of 161
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 12 Mar 2023 17:48
by BSA
Scott4Pack wrote: ↑12 Mar 2023 15:40
Makes up for all of the post-Lombardi years when we did finish last. Sometimes not even a respectable last.
- I think your memory is off. Those Packers certainly did struggle post- Lombardi, but they only finished last in the division 4 times between 1969 and 1992. That's only 4 out of 23. And in 2 of those last place seasons, they were tied with the Bears, the others were 1 or 2 games back of 3rd place.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 12 Mar 2023 19:07
by Scott4Pack
BSA wrote: ↑12 Mar 2023 17:48
Scott4Pack wrote: ↑12 Mar 2023 15:40
Makes up for all of the post-Lombardi years when we did finish last. Sometimes not even a respectable last.
- I think your memory is off. Those Packers certainly did struggle post- Lombardi, but they only finished last in the division 4 times between 1969 and 1992. That's only 4 out of 23. And in 2 of those last place seasons, they were tied with the Bears, the others were 1 or 2 games back of 3rd place.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/
Sure. That is four times more than we have seen since 1993?
:-)
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 12 Mar 2023 22:31
by APB
BSA wrote: ↑12 Mar 2023 17:48
Scott4Pack wrote: ↑12 Mar 2023 15:40
Makes up for all of the post-Lombardi years when we did finish last. Sometimes not even a respectable last.
- I think your memory is off. Those Packers certainly did struggle post- Lombardi, but they only finished last in the division 4 times between 1969 and 1992. That's only 4 out of 23. And in 2 of those last place seasons, they were tied with the Bears, the others were 1 or 2 games back of 3rd place.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/
Lucky for those Packer teams, the hapless Buccaneers were placed in the same NFC Central division upon their creation in 1976 to save the Packers from several more last place finishes.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 14 Mar 2023 15:22
by Scott4Pack
Oh no!!!
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 14 Mar 2023 15:25
by Pckfn23
APB wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023 11:43
lupedafiasco wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023 11:40
Only team negotiating with Lazard. Lol. This dude is trash.
He's about to be rich trash. Wanna bet his contract exceeds $10m APY?
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 14 Mar 2023 17:33
by BF004
So presently looking at a 5th round comp in 2024 for Lazard.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 14 Mar 2023 17:37
by YoHoChecko
Booooo
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 14 Mar 2023 17:41
by BSA
Dang it, wanted Reed to return
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 14 Mar 2023 17:47
by BF004
BF004 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023 17:33
So presently looking at a 5th round comp in 2024 for Lazard.
Damn, wanted Reed too.
So probably a 5 and a 7
Potentially a 5 and a 6.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 14 Mar 2023 18:04
by Trudge
BF004 wrote: ↑14 Mar 2023 17:33
So presently looking at a 5th round comp in 2024 for Lazard.
That's OK, we have Wyatt!
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 14 Mar 2023 22:14
by lupedafiasco
Only proves my theory that 75% of NFL GMs are actual special Olympics rejects.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 07:27
by APB
I'd be disappointed if O'Donnell isn't back. Dude was pretty solid.
Crosby? Well, ya'll know my thoughts.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 07:43
by BF004
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 07:55
by lupedafiasco
BF004 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 07:43
Come on. Someone bite.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 08:02
by YoHoChecko
I'd love to be wrong, but I'd put the odds of this at < 1%
People just patently ignoring the difference and history of restricted free agents by comparing it to the OT deals happening in unrestricted free agency.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 08:06
by lupedafiasco
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 08:02
I'd love to be wrong, but I'd put the odds of this at < 1%
People just patently ignoring the difference and history of restricted free agents by comparing it to the OT deals happening in unrestricted free agency.
I don’t think anyone will either. He’s not that good, a team would have to give up a 2nd, and pay him a deal.
Getting a 2nd for Yosh would be huge.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 08:20
by Scott4Pack
BF004 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 07:43
Good value, I think.
As for Crosby, yes he will be back. Oh brother.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 08:26
by BF004
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 08:02
I'd love to be wrong, but I'd put the odds of this at < 1%
People just patently ignoring the difference and history of restricted free agents by comparing it to the OT deals happening in unrestricted free agency.
No one ignoring it, no one predicting it. Yet if there was a time it could happen, one could connect the dots in this situation.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 08:44
by YoHoChecko
BF004 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 08:26
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 08:02
I'd love to be wrong, but I'd put the odds of this at < 1%
People just patently ignoring the difference and history of restricted free agents by comparing it to the OT deals happening in unrestricted free agency.
No one ignoring it, no one predicting it. Yet if there was a time it could happen, one could connect the dots in this situation.
Sorry, I was describing a lot of twitter reaction and like Peter Burkowski commentary in my comment, not this board necessarily.
Re: Green Bay Packers News 2023
Posted: 15 Mar 2023 09:06
by Drj820
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 08:44
BF004 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 08:26
YoHoChecko wrote: ↑15 Mar 2023 08:02
I'd love to be wrong, but I'd put the odds of this at < 1%
People just patently ignoring the difference and history of restricted free agents by comparing it to the OT deals happening in unrestricted free agency.
No one ignoring it, no one predicting it. Yet if there was a time it could happen, one could connect the dots in this situation.
Sorry, I was describing a lot of twitter reaction and like Peter Burkowski commentary in my comment, not this board necessarily.
Free advice: avoid Pete bukkaski