I mean it's not like the Packers beat the:
playoff Cardinals
playoff Steelers
NFCCG 49ers
AFC Champion Bengals
Super Bowl Champion Rams
Oh wait, they did... The only playoff team they played in the regular season and did not beat was the Chiefs...
I would have been happier had they beat a playoff team in the playoffs. Oh wait, they didnt. Given ur logic I guarantee we beat the Chiefs....
Looks like my comment went over your head, or you didn't follow the thread. It was pointing out that we didn't just feast on &%$@ teams in the regular season leading to an overinflated record. That was the Eagles. Commendable effort on trying to be witty though.
I would have rather been 9-7 and then won 4 playoff games.
I didnt follow the thread so its my bad. I check here infrequently and should not react to an individual post without realizing the context within the thread. Alot of things go over my head as well so u are on point.
Jerry Tagge, Scott Hunter, Jim Del Gazo, etc. It was all junk since the John Hadl fiasco (or was it a debacle?). It took forever to land good managers for the team who would draft and acquire good talent, let alone an elite QB.
The 80s and early 90s were so bad, it was tempting to become a Vikings fan.
Here's the back of Majik's 1992 Topps card showing some of his stats.
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 18 Feb 2022 21:24
by RingoCStarrQB
Majik threw 20 INTS in 1989. Dickey threw 29 INTS in 1983. And these were likely the best Packers QB performances since the Bart Starr won the MVP in 1966 (and of course before Favre and Holmgren came on the scene).
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 18 Feb 2022 22:47
by paco
I will not accept &%$@ on Majik. Was 2nd in MVP and OPOY voting in '89.
I will not accept &%$@ on Majik. Was 2nd in MVP and OPOY voting in '89.
Majik was a damn good QB on a poor but improving team. Had he not had that career ending injury he likely would have taken the Packers to the SB as the team around him improved. In reality the Packers have had 3 great QB's in a row, and hopefully in 2023/24 the Packers can be back in the playoffs with the 4th.
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 19 Feb 2022 06:43
by go pak go
This is what we mean when we say you can't compare QBs of different eras.
This got 2nd in best offensive performer voting. The rules have shifted so much to the offense now.
image.png (177.94 KiB) Viewed 653 times
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 21 Feb 2022 12:15
by BF004
At least the LockedOn Broncos host is all in.
Would gladly send 3 1sts and Jerry Jeudy for Rodgers.
Also gave a counter offer to Peter's offer,
2022: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 2023: 1st, 2nd 3rd, 2024: 1st for Rodgers and Davante
Seems just nutty to me, irresponsible not to take it almost.
Eagles LockOn host would be okay giving 3 first round picks in 2022, 15, 16 and 19.
Still just absolutely never believe it until we see it.
Still just absolutely never believe it until we see it.
A couple of things in our favor.
1.) Perception is know he could end up staying here and being happy. "We don't have to trade him."
2.) Multiple teams. A few known teams and one or two hiding in the shadows could cause the price to get up there real quick.
If they do move forward with a deal, this is about as unprecedented as it gets it terms of what the other team gets. In only seems reasonable that it should be unprecedented in what we would get in return.
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 21 Feb 2022 13:02
by BF004
I'm still not sure on Davante.
If Aaron is back, you find a way to get Davante back.
If you trade Aaron, I am okay either way, signing Davante long term to pair with Love, of seeing what you can get in the market.
Say should Rodgers end up in Denver or Las Vegas, I do kind of like the bargaining angle with Denver, Las Vegas, and the Chargers, that if one of you don't up your ante, we're gunna be trading him to one of your division rivals. Like if you are Denver and you don't improve your team outside of adding Aaron Rodgers really, the Raiders are keeping pretty much everyone and have cap space, and they add Davante, then you still have Herbert and Mahomes in the division to deal with.
Or if you are the Raiders, you extend Derek Carr, and then what, have to play 6 games a year against Mahomes, Rodgers with Davante, and Herbert.
Or then the same for the Chargers.
Kind of basically, you get Davante to top your division opponents from getting him, because you'll know you are just entering about a 3 year window where you are gunna have the strongest schedule draws in a generation.
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 21 Feb 2022 13:27
by go pak go
Yeah there is just so much benefit to trading Davante because it gives us so much power. We can either use it to sign him an extension or we can use it to up the trade of #12 and #17. Because as others have said, we can be respectful of keeping 12 and 17 together but make the buying team just pay a higher price to do it.
No tag of Adams and the team can get him for nothing all we net is a 2023 NFL 3rd rounder.
Looks like Rodgers is back in the spirit world with his peyote already this offseason.
LOL
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 22 Feb 2022 06:36
by paco
This most definitely reads like a man saying goodbye. Not sure how texas doesn't get that from it. But with Rodgers anything is a possibility. He's been all about gratitude all year. Until it is official, I'm not going to speculate further.
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 22 Feb 2022 07:54
by Acrobat
Report: Rodgers will make a decision about his future.
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 22 Feb 2022 07:54
by Drj820
very well could just be a planned move to juice up ratings for Mcafee today.
Re: Rodgers future
Posted: 22 Feb 2022 08:03
by NCF
I gotta say, with this beautiful mystery, the preferred outcomes are definitely the extremes. Either trade him for a haul and watch him play in another uniform or run it back, mortgage the future, and compete for another championship over the next few seasons. The in between scenario, retirement, would be the most absolute bummer after all of this, even if it should have been a more likely outcome all along.
