Re: 2022 Draft Discussion
Posted: 03 Dec 2021 09:34
Nice to see the widespread confidence in Gutey finally ......
The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
Not me. His draft record is not great. He has been good in other areas of player acquisition.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021 09:34Nice to see the widespread confidence in Gutey finally ......
Man I think he hit some home runs in the draft.wallyuwl wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021 21:27Not me. His draft record is not great. He has been good in other areas of player acquisition.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021 09:34Nice to see the widespread confidence in Gutey finally ......
Also an pretty damn good hit rate on low rounders who are at least positive contributors in their roles. If we win the SB, guys like Newman, Slaton, Runyan, Keke, MVS and others will have had a hand in it.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021 23:14Man I think he hit some home runs in the draft.wallyuwl wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021 21:27Not me. His draft record is not great. He has been good in other areas of player acquisition.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑03 Dec 2021 09:34Nice to see the widespread confidence in Gutey finally ......
Who has hit better. I'll take
Jaire
Gary
Savage
Jenkins
Dillon.
Stokes
Outside of an unproven love hes hit bombs early.
All those dudes are playing well. ... Some are all pros
I know we cover this every year but the get position x at pick y is almost exactly what teams Dont do. Sometimes it lines up bc of BVA but to just say get a wr at this spot or te at this one you will be disappointed.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑04 Dec 2021 08:03A lot depends on whose 1st round pick we get for Rodgers. Even pick #15 or 16 should get a good WR. If there are 2 second round picks I would not object to using #48 to move up from #16.
Assuming that Bakh gets to 100% in January and that Z and Jaire return, there are not many holes. Take the BPA at #32 and #64. Maybe an extra TE in the 3rd or 4th (6'5" or more), a backup QB anywhere from the 3rd to the 7th.
It is kind of early, we don't know who will get hurt and whose injuries permanently harm their careers yet.
You are assuming Rodgers will not be back next year. AR was not ready to start when he was about as long in his development as Love is today. I hope Love will eventually be able to be an effective starter for us but he isn't right now. IMO it would be stupid with this good of a roster to get rid of our HOF QB in 2022.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑04 Dec 2021 08:03A lot depends on whose 1st round pick we get for Rodgers. Even pick #15 or 16 should get a good WR. If there are 2 second round picks I would not object to using #48 to move up from #16.
Assuming that Bakh gets to 100% in January and that Z and Jaire return, there are not many holes. Take the BPA at #32 and #64. Maybe an extra TE in the 3rd or 4th (6'5" or more), a backup QB anywhere from the 3rd to the 7th.
It is kind of early, we don't know who will get hurt and whose injuries permanently harm their careers yet.
If the Packers win the SB and Rodgers plays well in the playoffs, the Packers might very well get more, but not in the 2022 draft. Not until 2023.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑04 Dec 2021 08:50I know we cover this every year but the get position x at pick y is almost exactly what teams Dont do. Sometimes it lines up bc of BVA but to just say get a wr at this spot or te at this one you will be disappointed.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑04 Dec 2021 08:03A lot depends on whose 1st round pick we get for Rodgers. Even pick #15 or 16 should get a good WR. If there are 2 second round picks I would not object to using #48 to move up from #16.
Assuming that Bakh gets to 100% in January and that Z and Jaire return, there are not many holes. Take the BPA at #32 and #64. Maybe an extra TE in the 3rd or 4th (6'5" or more), a backup QB anywhere from the 3rd to the 7th.
It is kind of early, we don't know who will get hurt and whose injuries permanently harm their careers yet.
We can all agree GB is going to draft wrs next spring but not reaching off their board. Gutey has shown he likes guys with elite numbers early. (Gary Jaire Savage all jumped out the gym)
Also lets say AR does get traded (I dont think he does but thats for another thread) I really feel its gonna come at a higher cost then a 1st and 2nd. Denver whom I'm assuming is the team here would be parting with Judey/Fant and prob more picks. Then the need to trade up would be for a game wrecker prob on D. 3 guys that are going top 10 and most likely higher that would look great in GB would be Hutchinson Karlaftis and Leal
I really like Olave but not to try and get in the top 10.
just stop, you have no idea what your talking about concerning any of this, none of us do, but for anyone to think Rodgers won't bring top trade value is about 5 bottles short of a 6 pack, again he's in the running for another MVP award, and that would make 4, has anyone ever won 4 MVP's before?TheSkeptic wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021 10:34If the Packers win the SB and Rodgers plays well in the playoffs, the Packers might very well get more, but not in the 2022 draft. Not until 2023.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑04 Dec 2021 08:50I know we cover this every year but the get position x at pick y is almost exactly what teams Dont do. Sometimes it lines up bc of BVA but to just say get a wr at this spot or te at this one you will be disappointed.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑04 Dec 2021 08:03A lot depends on whose 1st round pick we get for Rodgers. Even pick #15 or 16 should get a good WR. If there are 2 second round picks I would not object to using #48 to move up from #16.
Assuming that Bakh gets to 100% in January and that Z and Jaire return, there are not many holes. Take the BPA at #32 and #64. Maybe an extra TE in the 3rd or 4th (6'5" or more), a backup QB anywhere from the 3rd to the 7th.
It is kind of early, we don't know who will get hurt and whose injuries permanently harm their careers yet.
We can all agree GB is going to draft wrs next spring but not reaching off their board. Gutey has shown he likes guys with elite numbers early. (Gary Jaire Savage all jumped out the gym)
Also lets say AR does get traded (I dont think he does but thats for another thread) I really feel its gonna come at a higher cost then a 1st and 2nd. Denver whom I'm assuming is the team here would be parting with Judey/Fant and prob more picks. Then the need to trade up would be for a game wrecker prob on D. 3 guys that are going top 10 and most likely higher that would look great in GB would be Hutchinson Karlaftis and Leal
I really like Olave but not to try and get in the top 10.
Brady has 5 MVP's. The one that matters. Montana has 3. Starr and Bradshaw have 2. Rodgers and 16 other QB's have 1.Yoop wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021 10:55just stop, you have no idea what your talking about concerning any of this, none of us do, but for anyone to think Rodgers won't bring top trade value is about 5 bottles short of a 6 pack, again he's in the running for another MVP award, and that would make 4, has anyone ever won 4 MVP's before?TheSkeptic wrote: ↑05 Dec 2021 10:34If the Packers win the SB and Rodgers plays well in the playoffs, the Packers might very well get more, but not in the 2022 draft. Not until 2023.Backthepack4ever wrote: ↑04 Dec 2021 08:50
I know we cover this every year but the get position x at pick y is almost exactly what teams Dont do. Sometimes it lines up bc of BVA but to just say get a wr at this spot or te at this one you will be disappointed.
We can all agree GB is going to draft wrs next spring but not reaching off their board. Gutey has shown he likes guys with elite numbers early. (Gary Jaire Savage all jumped out the gym)
Also lets say AR does get traded (I dont think he does but thats for another thread) I really feel its gonna come at a higher cost then a 1st and 2nd. Denver whom I'm assuming is the team here would be parting with Judey/Fant and prob more picks. Then the need to trade up would be for a game wrecker prob on D. 3 guys that are going top 10 and most likely higher that would look great in GB would be Hutchinson Karlaftis and Leal
I really like Olave but not to try and get in the top 10.