Page 31 of 47

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 10:14
by go pak go
Yoop wrote:
22 Feb 2022 09:55
go pak go wrote:
22 Feb 2022 09:32
Retire next year Rodgers after we get a haul from the Broncos.

Retiring this year as a Packer would absolutely suck.

Also, if I am a trading team, I am absolutely putting in contingencies on removing future picks in a trade if Rodgers retires after a certain time period.
what GM would go along with that?, thats a good reason for us to get all we can this year, any GM trading for Rodgers knows going into the deal that Rodgers word means nothing, and he is loyal to no one, Rodgers is a phony, everyone is closed lip with him because ya never know how he will take anything thats said in reference to him, he wears his feelings on his shirt sleeve and seems to always be looking for something to resent and hold a grudge over
So you explained exactly why if I am a trading team I would want to place contingencies on my offer.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 10:19
by Drj820
Yoop wrote:
22 Feb 2022 09:55
Rodgers word means nothing, and he is loyal to no one, Rodgers is a phony,
Rodgers has been a good soldier for over a decade and shown alot of loyalty to the org and the fans. It was a good marriage for a very long time.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 10:44
by Half Empty
Drj820 wrote:
22 Feb 2022 10:19
Yoop wrote:
22 Feb 2022 09:55
Rodgers word means nothing, and he is loyal to no one, Rodgers is a phony,
Rodgers has been a good soldier for over a decade and shown alot of loyalty to the org and the fans. It was a good marriage for a very long time.
Not arguing, just wondering - what's the basis for that opinion?

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 10:57
by Drj820
Half Empty wrote:
22 Feb 2022 10:44
Drj820 wrote:
22 Feb 2022 10:19
Yoop wrote:
22 Feb 2022 09:55
Rodgers word means nothing, and he is loyal to no one, Rodgers is a phony,
Rodgers has been a good soldier for over a decade and shown alot of loyalty to the org and the fans. It was a good marriage for a very long time.
Not arguing, just wondering - what's the basis for that opinion?
Last offseason was the first time we heard even a peep from Rodgers about threatening to leave. Before that, he sat quietly for three full seasons on the bench, allowed the franchise to move on from Brett without burning the place down, won a SB with the Org, won many division crowns, has stayed out of trouble in GB, and signed multiple contracts. If Rodgers wanted out of the small market, there have been plenty of opportunities to do so before last year. He has brought us many good Sundays, as the org has provided him with the tools to win many games. Hes been a fine soldier. Much better days over the last decade with Rodgers in GB than without.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 11:05
by Half Empty
Drj820 wrote:
22 Feb 2022 10:57
Half Empty wrote:
22 Feb 2022 10:44
Drj820 wrote:
22 Feb 2022 10:19


Rodgers has been a good soldier for over a decade and shown alot of loyalty to the org and the fans. It was a good marriage for a very long time.
Not arguing, just wondering - what's the basis for that opinion?
Last offseason was the first time we heard even a peep from Rodgers about threatening to leave. Before that, he sat quietly for three full seasons on the bench, allowed the franchise to move on from Brett without burning the place down, won a SB with the Org, won many division crowns, has stayed out of trouble in GB, and signed multiple contracts. If Rodgers wanted out of the small market, there have been plenty of opportunities to do so before last year. He has brought us many good Sundays, as the org has provided him with the tools to win many games. Hes been a fine soldier. Much better days over the last decade with Rodgers in GB than without.
I guess just more of the same subjectivity and semantics that affect most sports discussions. I agree with most of what you say, just don't view it the same way. Sitting quietly behind a HOF QB after having fallen off the table in the draft seems pretty reasonable. Signed multiple contracts, sure, but good soldier and loyalty to me have to take a far second when those contracts are measured. Agree on most of the facts, disagree on the interpretation of them.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 11:09
by BF004

:munch:

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 11:10
by BF004

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 11:40
by Drj820
paco wrote:
22 Feb 2022 08:46
Drj820 wrote:
22 Feb 2022 07:54
very well could just be a planned move to juice up ratings for Mcafee today.
Its not even confirmed he'll be on McAfee today.
It was obvious

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 11:42
by paco
Drj820 wrote:
22 Feb 2022 11:40
paco wrote:
22 Feb 2022 08:46
Drj820 wrote:
22 Feb 2022 07:54
very well could just be a planned move to juice up ratings for Mcafee today.
Its not even confirmed he'll be on McAfee today.
It was obvious
Yes, it was. But not confirmed until the show started.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 11:43
by NCF
Almost the full capacity of Lambeau Field streaming McAfee right now.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 11:54
by RingoCStarrQB
This never ever ever ending drama is exactly why some people would rather watch Youtube videos from 1967 of the Roadrunner running back kickoffs in the offseason (to better understand Special Teams possibilities) ......... and/or wonder which 2022 Packers games will be on MNF, SNF, TNF! :nono:

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... it-may-be/

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 11:59
by BF004



Decently over 100K people tuned into the show right now.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 12:07
by Yoop
RingoCStarrQB wrote:
22 Feb 2022 11:54
This never ever ever ending drama is exactly why some people would rather watch Youtube videos from 1967 of the Roadrunner running back kickoffs in the offseason (to better understand Special Teams possibilities) ......... and/or wonder which 2022 Packers games will be on MNF, SNF, TNF! :nono:

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... it-may-be/
no kidding, I'am turning on the movie grumpy old men, talking to my brother yesterday and both of us are pretty sure if we'd had the Majik man the last 2 years we'd have two more Lombardi's in the trophy case now, Rodgers is a choker.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 12:07
by paco
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 12:08
by NCF
$%@# you, Aaron.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 12:08
by BF004
Dick said no news of his future today, lol


I feel like no news is probably good though. I can't not root for a 3 first round trade at this point, some type of 'announcement' would make that less likely.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 12:12
by Pugger
I will say if he was retiring he wouldn't be dancing around it like this.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 12:14
by NCF



Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 12:20
by paco
NCF wrote:
22 Feb 2022 12:14


Queue the Rodgers is full of &%$@ jokes.

Re: Rodgers future

Posted: 22 Feb 2022 12:45
by Crazylegs Starks
paco wrote:
22 Feb 2022 12:20
Queue the Rodgers is full of &%$@ jokes.
It's not a joke if it's true... :|