Yoop wrote: ↑25 Sep 2020 07:57
people hate McGinn because he doesn't provide the ear candy as much as the rest of our beat writers do.
I disagree. I think the Packers (and most teams) have no shortage of pessimistic and/or curmudgeonly writers--Silverstein comes to mind.
I'll also say that my Dad was a sportswriter for 35 years here in Annapolis, Maryland and when I was five, he was ranked as "the most hated man in Annapolis" by a local magazine and had a segment of a public access show devoted to profiling the newly-minted "most hated man." He told me that hate mail means they're reading. So I
GET IT.
I think what upsets people about McGinn is not that he's hard on the team or the players; we are, too, in fact. What people dislike about McGinn is that before each offseason, McGinn picks
one, maybe two, storylines that define the offseason and he does not adjust those storylines to new information.
One offseason he insisted that the team wanted to get bigger and stronger, and then any move that was made that did NOT involve size and strength to his liking would be trashed as if it was a failure. But it is only a failure if you accept McGinn's original premise, which often seemed to have no source other than his own opinions. It's easy to pick one action item and then view every roster move or draft pick through that lens, but that's not how team building works.
McGinn has a
ton of value. He is very well-connected and he does the leg work, which is a lot more than most local beat writers can say. His "what the scouts say" items for the draft or free agent signings are insight that we can't get elsewhere. His weekly player grades are in the eye of the beholder, but it's certainly more work than most locals are doing.
The thing that gets our goat, though, is and has been and will continue to be his one-note narrative formation, that he invents or exaggerates, and then his inability to change his perspectives or narratives based on new information. If you read his first column after each season, then you know what he's going to say about everything else that happens for the next 6-9 months. He becomes predictable and rote.
And so often, the narrative is just... incorrect. Which is fine, we all make incorrect assertions around here. But you have to be able adapt to new information and understand that you don't speak for the team--even if you have a good source. Back in 2005 when I worked at the combine, I can tell you that multiple members of the personnel staff loved Jason Campbell and Adrian McPhereson at QB. I mean
raved. But a scout's opinion and the TT-personnel department consensus are different. He could have had Eliot Wolf himself saying "the team really needs to get bigger and stronger" and it doesn't mean that TT is viewing the personnel moves through that vain. It means Eliot wants them to, and nothing more.