Page 32 of 37

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 15:53
by go pak go
Yoop wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:49
go pak go wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:35
Yoop wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:26


hey leave Henry Black alone man, he didn't do anything :rotf:

I had to read your comment twice, the way you worded it was terrible, lol sticking Aaron Rodgers in there like that was confusing

no one saw Tonyan coming, he went from mediocre to stardom almost over night, the others that 23 mention where drafted, Tonyan was UDFA, big diff.
A. about Henry Black - that's the point. ;)

B. I don't think the wording of Aaron Rodgers was terrible. I think it is more about you having an automatic pissed off trigger whenever you read "Aaron Rodgers" and it not immediately being followed by OUR HERO. :lol:
:rotf: could be, I admit I was thinking about two things at the same time :lol:

Henry was stuck on slo mo on his safety coverage thats for sure, course that could be said for most of our defense, I expect we'll see vast improvement next week, course not sure it could be any worse, the only direction we can go is up
From an actual "defensive ranking" which is based on total yards allowed, the Packers defense is still currently top 10. ;)

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 15:56
by texas
I'm still just not going to draw any conclusions from week 1. We always suck in FL

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 16:04
by Yoop
go pak go wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:50
Yoop wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:42
Pckfn23 wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:30

So by that logic, undrafted automatically suck? Again, very odd way to look at it.
NO, and stop acting so childish for goodness sake, you know as well as anyone that the higher the picking comes higher expectations, your doing the same thing your accusing J of. mid or undrafted players often do suck, thats the nature of being mid round or undrafted, thats reality and you know it, we marvel at the few who don't suck, and those that do finally produce, but most don't, they always just suck, till there gone, and more go then stay.
Can I keep this when you and I get into the draft spat of "earlier pick = quicker Pro Ready"? :)
sure, but why would you ever contest that, it's true, the earlier the pick does translate to more ready to play almost always, thats why there early picks, not always of course, some positions are harder for any player to transition to this level ( QB, DL ) but thats why the draft has tiers of talent levels, but there are always outliers, we tend to name them draft day steals, some like Tonyan take a year or two to warent that classification, some like Shields show it as soon as they get here.

I know this though, I doubt the draft day spats will ever end :aok:

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 16:13
by Yoop
go pak go wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:53
Yoop wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:49
go pak go wrote:
14 Sep 2021 15:35


A. about Henry Black - that's the point. ;)

B. I don't think the wording of Aaron Rodgers was terrible. I think it is more about you having an automatic pissed off trigger whenever you read "Aaron Rodgers" and it not immediately being followed by OUR HERO. :lol:
:rotf: could be, I admit I was thinking about two things at the same time :lol:

Henry was stuck on slo mo on his safety coverage thats for sure, course that could be said for most of our defense, I expect we'll see vast improvement next week, course not sure it could be any worse, the only direction we can go is up
From an actual "defensive ranking" which is based on total yards allowed, the Packers defense is still currently top 10. ;)
wa haaaa, actually I'am more concerned with our points given up ranking, which can't be as good, remember when we screamed when Capers units gave up huge yardage, yet we won by two or 3 scores, so to me yards can be mis leading a bit, hopefully we hold the scoring down to match the yards given. :banana:

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 16:43
by Labrev
I will re-iterate one of the rare good takes made on FF's message board (paraphrased greatly): it is more productive to talk about players as having their given strengths and weaknesses than simply boil it down to them being good or just suck. :)

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 17:10
by BF004

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 20:01
by texas
Labrev wrote:
14 Sep 2021 16:43
I will re-iterate one of the rare good takes made on FF's message board (paraphrased greatly): it is more productive to talk about players as having their given strengths and weaknesses than simply boil it down to them being good or just suck. :)
Ok, Kevin King's strengths are nothing, and his weaknesses are everything

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 20:09
by lupedafiasco
texas wrote:
14 Sep 2021 20:01
Labrev wrote:
14 Sep 2021 16:43
I will re-iterate one of the rare good takes made on FF's message board (paraphrased greatly): it is more productive to talk about players as having their given strengths and weaknesses than simply boil it down to them being good or just suck. :)
Ok, Kevin King's strengths are nothing, and his weaknesses are everything
People will defend him until hes gone. Same thing happened with Randall.

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 20:38
by Pckfn23
Say Aye! if you are defending Kevin King or you defended Damarious Randall at the end?

Anyone?


Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 20:48
by lupedafiasco
Pckfn23 wrote:
14 Sep 2021 20:38
Say Aye! if you are defending Kevin King or you defended Damarious Randall at the end?

Anyone?

Ok buddy. You're the actual Hellen Keller of the forum. Deaf, dumb, and blind. Smd.

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 20:50
by Pckfn23
It looks like calling out odd and absurd statements is getting under some skin today.
Image

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 21:00
by APB
It’s been multiple pages of this back-and-forth now. That, even after other posters have tried to get the convo back on track.

I think the discussion over who said and meant what has been exhausted. Let’s leave the trolling behind and get back to meaningful football talk.

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 21:16
by BSA
Labrev wrote:
14 Sep 2021 16:43
it is more productive to talk about players as having their given strengths and weaknesses than simply boil it down to them being good or just suck.
100 % Agree-
And its far more instructive and interesting to read those nuggets, especially the well- done ones.

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 21:18
by Pckfn23
Despite a dismal performance from the offense overall, Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers had no issues with the way his reconfigured offensive line played in Week 1 against the New Orleans Saints. In fact, he was quite pleased with the performance from the five starters to open the season.

“I feel like the offensive line played really well,” Rodgers told “The Pat McAfee Show” on Tuesday. “I feel like Elgton (Jenkins) played really good at left tackle and Billy (Turner) at right tackle. The interior guys, the two rookie guys played really well. And Lucas Patrick. The protection was solid. I gifted one sack, and that was it, on a keeper. I feel like the protection was pretty good.”

The Packers offensive line allowed just one sack and three quarterback hits over 41 pass-blocking opportunities. At Pro Football Focus, the Packers were the second-highest graded pass-blocking offensive line in the NFL in Week 1.

Rodgers said he “didn’t take many shots” and took blame for the one sack. Saints defensive end Marcus Davenport was intentionally unblocked on a designed rollout, but Rodgers had to hold the ball and take the sack when the play didn’t develop down the field and Davenport closed the space in a hurry.

The Packers offensive line sits directly in the spotlight to start the season after losing All-Pro center in free agency and not having All-Pro left tackle David Bakhtiari (PUP list) for the first six games. Jenkins made his first start at left tackle in place of Bakhtiari and was excellent. Rookies Josh Myers and Royce Newman started on the interior and went through typical ups and downs for first-year players.

All things considered, the protection for Rodgers could have been a lot worse in Week 1, especially considering the game flow and how many times the Packers attempted to pass the football while down big on the scoreboard.

Pressure did cause the game-changing interception to start the second half, however. Rookie Royce Newman got beat clean by Cameron Jordan, who forced Rodgers to step up into the pocket and hurry a throw to Davante Adams running the shallow cross from right to left. A painful shot to a sensitive body part played a role in the bad throw, per Rodgers.

Overall, Rodgers was under pressure on 10 of his drop backs against the Saints. He completed just two passes and had an interception while under pressure. Unfortunately for the Packers, Rodgers also wasn’t any good from clean pockets.
https://packerswire.usatoday.com/2021/0 ... in-week-1/

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 21:20
by Pckfn23

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 21:28
by Pckfn23


Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 21:31
by Pckfn23


Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 21:41
by Pckfn23
https://www.jsonline.com/videos/sports/ ... js_packers

1st Play is Savage vacating the middle third and Sullivan passes off the deep crosser.

2nd Play, 4th and goal in the 2nd quarter. Amos let's TE right by him.

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 14 Sep 2021 22:01
by BF004

Re: Packers @ Saints GDT - 9/12/2021 3:25 CST

Posted: 15 Sep 2021 06:37
by NCF
BF004 wrote:
14 Sep 2021 22:01
That's not ideal from QB1, but at least our defense... oh, no.