Yoop wrote: ↑24 Feb 2023 09:45
previous post?? you mean the dozens of previous regurgitated opinions you've shared upon deaf ears
,
Actually my previous post was replied to, so... NAH NAH NAH NAH BOO BOO!!!!
this team can certainly compete with Rodgers, you and others have attempted to turn what is a very good nucleus of talent into some team devoid of it, all to float a opinion that we need a complete rebuild, might as well accept that we can't compete now, so why keep Rodgers, and thats hogwash,
No no, it's not the lack of a young nucleus of talent that is why I don't think we can compete, it's Rodgers's play at QB that's the reason. Pay attention.
ya know what I'am not hoping for is the hate thats likely to ensue if the FO should decide to keep Rodgers ( which they might) I expect to hear that there stupid for doing so, about what I hear now with the help of hind sight after the meltdown last season ( as though anyone expected that) the media has voiced there opinions, and a lot of fans listen to the media, well, as Ted Thompson once voiced, they think they know, but havn't a clue, meaning there is more to the story then there privy to.
Can't have it both ways, yoop. If you are going to say they know better than we do, that also applies to things they do that you don't like, such as, not drafting enough WRs.
Notice, I don't ever actually invoke the idea that the FO knows best. I support their decisions that *to me* are sensible. You interpret this (wrongly) as categorical support and defense of the FO, except I do not support decisions they make that I don't agree with (but I give it time to see how it turns out before saying it was right and wrong, and give credit if it turns out to be right).
So it turns out I am the real FO critic, not you!
what I've heard is the complete refusal by most to consider everything else that led up to a losing season and just lay the blame at Rodgers feet, and that is such a cop out, we may trade him, who knows, but no one can convince me at this point that Love could have done any better last year.
Then your hearing is bad. I have numerous posts about things other than Rodgers that I blame for the outcome of the season, defense being a big one. I would have canned Joe Barry and am vocally critical of them for not doing so.
The only "complete refusal" is of yours, to admit any fault of significance on 12. Hilariously you will often use the thumb as an excuse but then not actually admit his performance was substandard. If the thumb did not actually make him perform worse, then the injury does not matter.
I notice you keep trying to weasel out of this contradiction because it will force you to admit Rodgers did not perform well, which is against your religion.