Packers Huddle

Drj820 wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 18:59

Don’t see the value in a late 5 and 6 but

I actually REALLY wanted an additional 4th and 5th so that's a nice little trade for a very short move back.

But it's still the consolation plan for missing on pick 40. One pick. ONE PICK. This is a brutal fan experience.

I'm overstating things but it's friday and the drinks flow freely.

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:00

This is miserable. Missing The Guy by one pick due to a trade up is so sad. Nothing will convince me he wasn't the pick at 41. They traded as soon as the pick was in.

This was our guy for the secondary.

Hopefully we get Bullard.

BG doing his best TT impersonation this year

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:00

This is miserable. Missing The Guy by one pick due to a trade up is so sad. Nothing will convince me he wasn't the pick at 41. They traded as soon as the pick was in.

This was our guy for the secondary.

Hopefully we get Bullard.

It's miserable because it happened twice. Arnold was absolutely our pick yesterday.

Gute has 13 picks...he talked about wanting 13 or 14.

We will trade up tonight still I feel.

Smh I’m gonna miss the pick. I’ll find out I guess in a couple hours.

Can’t be mad at the Eagles or Lions for having the balls to do what we should have done.

Sucks, but I always love having more picks so I can't be mad.

Cooper or Kneeland would be fine

So is Edge Cooper gonna be our guy?

Rakestraw at 45 would leave me content

The difference between NFCCG appearances and Super Bowl appearances very well might by wanting to collect 6th round picks over giving up loot to go get the guy you really want

go pak go wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:02

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:00

This is miserable. Missing The Guy by one pick due to a trade up is so sad. Nothing will convince me he wasn't the pick at 41. They traded as soon as the pick was in.

This was our guy for the secondary.

Hopefully we get Bullard.

It's miserable because it happened twice. Arnold was absolutely our pick yesterday.

I disagree with that. I think WE wanted it, but the Packers were set at Morgan or trade back by all reasonable accounts. Sure they could be lying, but with the absolute lack of interest and moving up and the clearly frequent discussions about moving back, doesn't seem like they were angling for Arnold. That's tea leaves stuff, but I feel it. The team wanted Morgan at pick 1. They didn't get beat. But when a team moves up ahead of you and takes someone and you immediately move back--that's pretty sound speculative evidence he was a reason you were sticking around

BF004 wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:01

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:00

This is miserable. Missing The Guy by one pick due to a trade up is so sad. Nothing will convince me he wasn't the pick at 41. They traded as soon as the pick was in.

This was our guy for the secondary.

Hopefully we get Bullard.

Arnold and DeJean both.

Can’t wait to punch the eagles and lions on the mouth, dicks.

We're a beta male franchise tbh. The factor that causes us to always choke in the playoffs to tougher teams is the same factor that repeatedly causes us to sit on our ass during draft day, paralyzed, as we get sniped by teams that want it more than us.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:05

The difference between NFCCG appearances and Super Bowl appearances very well might by wanting to collect 6th round picks over giving up loot to go get the guy you really want

Maybe. Trading back in the second last draft was the difference between getting Reed vs. getting Reed, Kraft and Brooks

Hafley and Gutey have said they like the CB room. This isn't a huge surprise.

Gunzaan wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:04

Can’t be mad at the Eagles or Lions for having the balls to do what we should have done.

For a trade to happen you need two to tango. Can't trade up if the other team does not reciprocate.

If the Packers wanted Kool-Aid they would've stayed pat and not traded down. Maybe they have other DBs they like.

Edit: There goes Max Melton.

damnit.

You guys are just rich.

OOF and Melton

Frack this round. Absolutely ruined us.

It'll be fine. We'll take good players. But good grief we needed these DBs so badly

BF004 wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:07

You guys are just rich.

You are just content with losing in NFCCGs. Some of us prefer being aggressive from time to time

kampmanfan4life wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:06

Drj820 wrote: ↑

26 Apr 2024 19:05

The difference between NFCCG appearances and Super Bowl appearances very well might by wanting to collect 6th round picks over giving up loot to go get the guy you really want

Maybe. Trading back in the second last draft was the difference between getting Reed vs. getting Reed, Kraft and Brooks

It’s amazing how quickly people forget these little nuggets.