The Way a Packers Forum Should Be
https://packers-huddle.com/phpBB/
You are the 2nd most ignorant football poster I have come to "known."lupedafiasco wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:53You are the most Toby Flenderson person Ive ever come to known.
You have the mental capacity of a snail.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:54You are the 2nd most ignorant football poster I have come to "known."lupedafiasco wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:53You are the most Toby Flenderson person Ive ever come to known.
You're pathetic lupe.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 00:01You have the mental capacity of a snail.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:54You are the 2nd most ignorant football poster I have come to "known."lupedafiasco wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:53
You are the most Toby Flenderson person Ive ever come to known.
At least I use that capacity to know/talk football! Wish you would!lupedafiasco wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 00:01You have the mental capacity of a snail.Pckfn23 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:54You are the 2nd most ignorant football poster I have come to "known."lupedafiasco wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:53
You are the most Toby Flenderson person Ive ever come to known.
I was thinking about that. I think the Saints still have us beat in this waylake shark wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:24TheGreenMan wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:19Someone dropped the Bills in here earlier. It's starting to feel that way.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:16Three years. Three heart-wrenching playoff exits. Outplayed in the playoffs three years too.
Guty needs to decide on one of two choices.
1. Pay Rodgers and Adams, while cutting a host of other players. Accept a winning season and fall short of a ring, or maybe even a playoff win.
2. Release/trade Rodgers and Adams. Retool. Rebuild.
I’ll accept either choice. But Guty cannot waffle in between and think that Rodgers and Adams get the ring by themselves, even while Rodgers gets two more MVPs along the way.
I believe GB has fully replaced and superseded the Bills as the choke job team - we just don’t want to admit it.
LMAOOOTheGreenMan wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 00:02You're pathetic lupe.
But, I'm stealing this.
Well that obviously begs the question- who's #1Pckfn23 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:54You are the 2nd most ignorant football poster I have come to "known."lupedafiasco wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:53You are the most Toby Flenderson person Ive ever come to known.
I’m wondering how much Lewis’ fumble early played into Rodgers not wanting to get the ball to anybody not named Adams/Jones. For that matter, I wonder how much that played into MLF’s mind.texas wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:18Yeah we have historically sucked when he has done this, and we have historically been good when he spreads the ball around even to bums.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:14I don’t disagree with that. Seemed like Rodgers was so dialed in on only Adams that he wouldn’t use anybody else.
I guess 1st round receiving threats aren't as much of a panacea as they would have us believe.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 00:27I’m wondering how much Lewis’ fumble early played into Rodgers not wanting to get the ball to anybody not named Adams/Jones. For that matter, I wonder how much that played into MLF’s mind.texas wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:18Yeah we have historically sucked when he has done this, and we have historically been good when he spreads the ball around even to bums.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:14
I don’t disagree with that. Seemed like Rodgers was so dialed in on only Adams that he wouldn’t use anybody else.
The final FG.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 00:30Was there ANOTHER play where ST only had TEN players on the field?
Oh, that is entirely on the ST coach.
If he doesn't fire Drayton, then yes. Otherwise no.German_Panzer wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 01:14I would also like to take a serious look about MLF. He is a nice guy - as well as MM before him. Now many fans detect soft play as one constant in our futile quest to get to another SB after 2011. Coincidence? Do we need a more badass coach?
There really wasn’t “soft play” imo except for the long snapper on the punt block. Most of it was just dumb O play of running Jones up the middle every time and street ball passing.German_Panzer wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 01:14I would also like to take a serious look about MLF. He is a nice guy - as well as MM before him. Now many fans detect soft play as one constant in our futile quest to get to another SB after 2011. Coincidence? Do we need a more badass coach?
lake shark wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 01:23There really wasn’t “soft play” imo except for the long snapper on the punt block. Most of it was just dumb O play of running Jones up the middle every time and street ball passing.German_Panzer wrote: ↑23 Jan 2022 01:14I would also like to take a serious look about MLF. He is a nice guy - as well as MM before him. Now many fans detect soft play as one constant in our futile quest to get to another SB after 2011. Coincidence? Do we need a more badass coach?
The GB D line obliterated them. Barnes was crushing fools. Only thing D sucked at was covering the TE post.
Well, the Giants lost the NFL championship game in 1958, 1959, 1961, 1962 and 1963.lake shark wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:24TheGreenMan wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:19Someone dropped the Bills in here earlier. It's starting to feel that way.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:16Three years. Three heart-wrenching playoff exits. Outplayed in the playoffs three years too.
Guty needs to decide on one of two choices.
1. Pay Rodgers and Adams, while cutting a host of other players. Accept a winning season and fall short of a ring, or maybe even a playoff win.
2. Release/trade Rodgers and Adams. Retool. Rebuild.
I’ll accept either choice. But Guty cannot waffle in between and think that Rodgers and Adams get the ring by themselves, even while Rodgers gets two more MVPs along the way.
I believe GB has fully replaced and superseded the Bills as the choke job team - we just don’t want to admit it.
Rodgers is not as intelligent as many think. He is stubborn to a fault, which is not indicative of a truly intelligent person. With the exception of 2010, he has not been able to lead his team to playoff success.BF004 wrote: ↑22 Jan 2022 23:44Will take a little time to emotionally think about this, but I think he is done as a packer.
I think he is so light years ahead of Love intellectually and prolly will be forever, over every other Qb who has ever played.
But we’re just not gunna have a good of team on paper with cap reasons.
Matt had to make special teams #1 priority or even qb this year, figure it out after that.
