Page 1 of 2
53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 07:54
by RingoCStarrQB
New thread started to begin our in-depth analysis of the 2022 roster as it stands today, after the cuts are complete and the roster in unveiled.
Let's break this discussion up into:
Defensive Line
Linebackers
Safeties
Corners
Kicker, Punter, and Longsnapper
Punt Returner
Kick Returner
QBs
WRs
RBs
Offensive Line
TE
Special Teamers
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 15:16
by APB
If Crosby sucks coming out the gate, ya'll gonna hear about it...
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 15:21
by Crazylegs Starks
APB wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:16
If Crosby sucks coming out the gate, ya'll gonna hear about it...
Fire Bisaccia! Fire Gutey!
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 15:25
by APB
I thought Ahmed looked good enough to be a potential transition from Crosby. Strong leg. It was weird seeing kickoffs 6 yds deep into the EZ during PS.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 15:27
by Drj820
I guess the org agrees with me on Winfree. Heflin deserved a spot on the 53 imo.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 15:29
by Drj820
And...dang...I really liked Goodson...
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 15:35
by paco
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:27
I guess the org agrees with me on Winfree. Heflin deserved a spot on the 53 imo.
I like Heflin. Chris Slayton too. But we don't need a 6th DL on the roster. Heflin got less than 20 snaps on defense and ST combined last year as #6. And he wasn't good enough to beat any of the 5 ahead of him. I hope they can get 1 or both on the PS though.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 15:45
by lupedafiasco
APB wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:16
If Crosby sucks coming out the gate, ya'll gonna hear about it...
I think it just came down to experience. Coming into the season with little practice or reps I expect Crosby to be bad early.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 15:57
by Drj820
lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:45
APB wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:16
If Crosby sucks coming out the gate, ya'll gonna hear about it...
I think it just came down to experience. Coming into the season with little practice or reps I expect Crosby to be bad early.
I think it came down do being best buds with 12
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 16:09
by Yoop
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:57
lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:45
APB wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:16
If Crosby sucks coming out the gate, ya'll gonna hear about it...
I think it just came down to experience. Coming into the season with little practice or reps I expect Crosby to be bad early.
I think it came down do being best buds with 12
haha, maybe, it does seem like Rodgers has a lot more input these days
I look at place kicking the same way as Golf, unless you really get technically out of wack it's like riding a bike, I wouldn't hit a golf ball all winter and the first game in the spring I'd hit my average, so unless the holder and snapper screw up I expect Mason will be fine
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 16:13
by Drj820
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:09
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:57
lupedafiasco wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:45
I think it just came down to experience. Coming into the season with little practice or reps I expect Crosby to be bad early.
I think it came down do being best buds with 12
haha, maybe, it does seem like Rodgers has a lot more input these days
I look at place kicking the same way as Golf, unless you really get technically out of wack it's like riding a bike, I wouldn't hit a golf ball all winter and the first game in the spring I'd hit my average, so unless the holder and snapper screw up I expect Mason will be fine
Im ñot worried about mason being awful. I just think we could find someone as good as him for cheaper. That person may could kick it out of the back of the end zone on kick offs too
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 16:17
by Yoop
APB wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:16
If Crosby sucks coming out the gate, ya'll gonna hear about it...
of course, of course, of course we'll have it coming
thing is even last year when they wanted Crosby to boot it into the EZ, he did it, so to me that says he can still do it, what is shocking to me it that as bad as our coverage was they still wanted him to kick it inside the 5 hoping to pin them deep, I might be wrong, but I think the plan is to blame more then the kicker.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 16:24
by Yoop
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:13
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:09
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 15:57
I think it came down do being best buds with 12
haha, maybe, it does seem like Rodgers has a lot more input these days
I look at place kicking the same way as Golf, unless you really get technically out of wack it's like riding a bike, I wouldn't hit a golf ball all winter and the first game in the spring I'd hit my average, so unless the holder and snapper screw up I expect Mason will be fine
Im ñot worried about mason being awful. I just think we could find someone as good as him for cheaper. That person may could kick it out of the back of the end zone on kick offs too
teams that kick it out the back of the EZ are saying we can't stop you from getting to the 25 yrd line, so we wont even try, we give up
now we probably should have been doing that as atrocious as our coverage has been at times, but it's a attitude of a defeatist, the goal kicking it just a little short is to pin there offense deep and hope for a turn over and TD, that assuredly wont happen just giving them the ball on the 25.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 16:52
by Drj820
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:24
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:13
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:09
haha, maybe, it does seem like Rodgers has a lot more input these days
I look at place kicking the same way as Golf, unless you really get technically out of wack it's like riding a bike, I wouldn't hit a golf ball all winter and the first game in the spring I'd hit my average, so unless the holder and snapper screw up I expect Mason will be fine
Im ñot worried about mason being awful. I just think we could find someone as good as him for cheaper. That person may could kick it out of the back of the end zone on kick offs too
teams that kick it out the back of the EZ are saying we can't stop you from getting to the 25 yrd line, so we wont even try, we give up
now we probably should have been doing that as atrocious as our coverage has been at times, but it's a attitude of a defeatist, the goal kicking it just a little short is to pin there offense deep and hope for a turn over and TD, that assuredly wont happen just giving them the ball on the 25.
Defeatist attitude? It’s called being smart and reducing risk...when your coverage team is total a**
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 16:56
by Yoop
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:52
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:24
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:13
Im ñot worried about mason being awful. I just think we could find someone as good as him for cheaper. That person may could kick it out of the back of the end zone on kick offs too
teams that kick it out the back of the EZ are saying we can't stop you from getting to the 25 yrd line, so we wont even try, we give up
now we probably should have been doing that as atrocious as our coverage has been at times, but it's a attitude of a defeatist, the goal kicking it just a little short is to pin there offense deep and hope for a turn over and TD, that assuredly wont happen just giving them the ball on the 25.
Defeatist attitude? It’s called being smart and reducing risk...when your coverage team is total a**
what about our ST's was smart? go look at good ST's units, they don't kick it into the EZ.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 30 Aug 2022 17:51
by Drj820
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:56
Drj820 wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:52
Yoop wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022 16:24
teams that kick it out the back of the EZ are saying we can't stop you from getting to the 25 yrd line, so we wont even try, we give up
now we probably should have been doing that as atrocious as our coverage has been at times, but it's a attitude of a defeatist, the goal kicking it just a little short is to pin there offense deep and hope for a turn over and TD, that assuredly wont happen just giving them the ball on the 25.
Defeatist attitude? It’s called being smart and reducing risk...when your coverage team is total a**
what about our ST's was smart? go look at good ST's units, they don't kick it into the EZ.
True. Of which we were not a good STs unit, which is why I just want to boot it in the end zone, not take an injury risk, eliminate the Risk of a big return, and play d from the 25.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 31 Aug 2022 09:03
by Pugger
I think it is waaaay too early to know what kind of ST unit we will have. There is no way Bisaccia was going to wave his magic wand and this unit is fixed. Now that he has his players he can get to work. In my mind ST can only get better (they couldn't be any worse than last season's).
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 31 Aug 2022 10:29
by Pckfn23
I think a lot of the cuts/keeps at the bottom of the roster that are being wondered about were specifically meant for special teams. That should be a good sign at least. Whether that pans out or not remains to be seen.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 31 Aug 2022 10:32
by Pckfn23
A LOT more in depth analysis on Toure spattered across Twitter. I will try to post them if I get a chance.
Re: 53 Roster Analysis
Posted: 01 Sep 2022 03:54
by TheSkeptic
Pckfn23 wrote: ↑31 Aug 2022 10:32
A LOT more in depth analysis on Toure spattered across Twitter. I will try to post them if I get a chance.
Nice pass protection on the first 2 videos