Packers Huddle

Here's your choices:

# Wins: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.

Ringo: 10 wins

Too early to say without the compensation and draft. For now 7 wins.

11-12

Full year of Nixon returning?

lupedafiasco wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023 07:53

Too early to say without the compensation and draft.

Bingo.

Just a bit premature.

12

I believe!

10

Right now with a supposedly weaker schedule I'd go 10.

RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023 07:40

Here's your choices:

# Wins: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.

Ringo: 10 wins

I'd like to see a few more choices please

10 wins, Nixon will provide 800 yards of field position

11-12 wins is well within reach for a talented squad like the 2023 Packers
When the win totals come out this summer, I'd guess GB will be at either 8.5 or 9 wins for the O/U

That 3rd place schedule combined with the weak NFC South opponents bodes well for a solid conference record

https://www.packers.com/schedule/2023-opponents

I'd say 5/6 wins. After Favre left Rodgers' first year starting with a stronger supporting cast went 6-10.

7

I will say 9 wins if Love stays healthy.

TheSkeptic wrote: ↑

14 Mar 2023 12:35

I will say 9 wins if Love stays healthy.

7 if Love stays healthy. 4 or 5 if he doesn't.

With Rodgers at helm: 13, Playoffs (but somewhere along the line losing, once again missing the SB)
With Love at helm: 7, no Playoffs.

If Love is QB: ?

If Rodgers is QB: 4

The NFC North is improving while the Packers take a step while their young QB gets his legs under him. 6 or 7 wins,

Between 6 and 10 regardless of who is QB.

You guys humiliate our diva! I think some here will really wake up. A motivated Rodgers without major injuries and a deep, talented team will be a force, winning his 5th MVP and play a significant role for the SB. I remember Peyton in his first year? in Denver when they dominated but then Seattle shocked them in the SB. I can easily see something similiar with #12 and the Jets.

4-13. I called 4-12 in '91 and nailed it. Moderator, delete this, just like my last 3 clean, legit posts. Sorry I don't fall in line like the hammers in "The Wall." Sad what this site has become. Real sad.

Tooothsome Jeb wrote: ↑

15 Mar 2023 03:51

4-13. I called 4-12 in '91 and nailed it. Moderator, delete this, just like my last 3 clean, legit posts. Sorry I don't fall in line like the hammers in "The Wall." Sad what this site has become. Real sad.

Perhaps a review of Rules 1 and 3 is warranted. Your deleted posts were poster child examples of fan rage because the team didn't do what you wanted. Put together a coherent post that doesn't rip on fellow fans and/or incessantly whine about others not being as outraged over team management decisions as you and it'll stand.