Packers Huddle

Tank for tua

Tanking engaged.

I’d rather have kept him and extended him for that price; personally.

Bills 3rd gunna be bad.

Our 5th gunna be good.

BF004 wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 14:44

I’d rather have kept him and extended him for that price; personally.

Bills 3rd gunna be bad.

Our 5th gunna be good.

I think I agree. A bit surprised by this move, but not shocked.

Only Bakh is allowed to tell the truth about the team

Happy for him, he deserves to play for a competitive team. Sad to see him go. 'Curious to see what we got. He was probably not in the long-term plans, but we lose a good player and veteran leadership on a team that lacks both.

This is not a move you make if you see yourself being competitive, but it is probably wise to be sellers than buyers at the trade deadline.

better sell some more pieces if we really are tanking. I think this is punishment for Sully calling out the Offense.

He said "They are not young, and if they are, they gotta grow up. It aint no such thing as being young. You had what? 5 games? Thats enough"

Lafleur only lets Bakh be honest.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 14:57

better sell some more pieces if we really are tanking. I think this is punishment for Sully calling out the Offense.

He said "They are not young, and if they are, they gotta grow up. It aint no such thing as being young. You had what? 5 games? Thats enough"

Lafleur only lets Bakh be honest.

yup talk about leadership, I new when he said that he wasn't talking about himself as much as referring to the lack of it from the coaches and GM , and now the leaders job ya, be interesting to see if he Jobs a few more malcontents, I love to hear what Alexander thinks about this.

A third? A third?! Those are worthless! If it was a 4th, I'd be on board.

Labrev wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 14:52

Happy for him, he deserves to play for a competitive team. Sad to see him go. He was probably not in the long-term plans, but we lose a good player and veteran leadership on a team that lacks both.

This is not a move you make if you see yourself being competitive, but it is probably wise to be sellers than buyers at the trade deadline.

I came here to post these exact sentiments, almost to the word.

I am genuinely happy Rasul gets to play for a potential contender and genuinely sad he is no longer a Packer.

In case there was any lingering doubts that there is a full re-build going on in Green Bay, I think the trade of one of the top performers on defense pretty much puts them to rest.

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 15:07

A third? A third?! Those are worthless! If it was a 4th, I'd be on board.

It will be a back end third if that helps

Labrev wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 14:52

Happy for him, he deserves to play for a competitive team. Sad to see him go. 'Curious to see what we got. He was probably not in the long-term plans, but we lose a good player and veteran leadership on a team that lacks both.

This is not a move you make if you see yourself being competitive, but it is probably wise to be sellers than buyers at the trade deadline.

I suppose that they can use both 3'rd's for another 2nd.

I think it is going to be interesting what Rasul has to say about the Packers. He generally doesn't hold back - we could be in for a treat over the coming days.

bud fox wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 15:08

Crazylegs Starks wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 15:07

A third? A third?! Those are worthless! If it was a 4th, I'd be on board.

It will be a back end third if that helps

Sigh. Maybe we can "pull a Vikings" and just let other teams pick until the 4th round starts

Labrev wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 14:52

Happy for him, he deserves to play for a competitive team. Sad to see him go. 'Curious to see what we got. He was probably not in the long-term plans, but we lose a good player and veteran leadership on a team that lacks both.

This is not a move you make if you see yourself being competitive, but it is probably wise to be sellers than buyers at the trade deadline.

does anyone have a inkling what those long term plans are? personally I think we are in wing it mode, personally I don't think Gutekunst even has a plan, not when it came to Love anyway, he was late to redo the receiver room as well as making sure this OL wouldn't derail this season, and now it appears he's content to tank this season.

making it really hard for me to be a loyal Packer fan and supportive, I'am entering the zone of firing everyone from Murphy on down, and starting from scratch, it's been one poor decision after another imo since 2016

Drj820 wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 14:57

better sell some more pieces if we really are tanking. I think this is punishment for Sully calling out the Offense.

He said "They are not young, and if they are, they gotta grow up. It aint no such thing as being young. You had what? 5 games? Thats enough"

Lafleur only lets Bakh be honest.

Yes, we were already made aware of your bakhtiari opinion 2 posts earlier. In this thread about Rasul Douglas. Can you please hold back on the pet topics?

BF004 wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 14:44

I’d rather have kept him and extended him for that price; personally.

Bills 3rd gunna be bad.

Our 5th gunna be good.

So that’s probably only gunna be an upgrade of like 40-50 spots.

Drj820 wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2023 14:57

better sell some more pieces if we really are tanking. I think this is punishment for Sully calling out the Offense.

He said "They are not young, and if they are, they gotta grow up. It aint no such thing as being young. You had what? 5 games? Thats enough"

Lafleur only lets Bakh be honest.

Lafleur had nothing to do with this, he may be small in stature, but he doesn't come off as Petty, Gutekunst has that trait all wrapped up, this was all Brian Gutekunst.