Rank the Roster 2024: #16

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Post Reply

Who are the next two best players on the Packers

Poll ended at 25 May 2024 13:03

AJ Dillon
0
No votes
Keisean Nixon
1
4%
Romeo Doubs
7
26%
Lukas Van Ness
7
26%
Josh Myers
0
No votes
Eric Stokes
3
11%
TJ Slaton
0
No votes
Kingsley Enagbare
0
No votes
Tucker Kraft
3
11%
Jordan Morgan
0
No votes
Javon Bullard
1
4%
MarShawn Lloyd
0
No votes
Carrington Valentine
3
11%
Karl Brooks
0
No votes
Edgerrin Cooper
0
No votes
Rasheed Walker
2
7%
Sean Rhyan
0
No votes
Colby Wooden
0
No votes
Ty'Ron Hopper
0
No votes
Evan Williams
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 27

User avatar
Waldo
Reactions:
Posts: 958
Joined: 19 Mar 2020 10:33

Rank the Roster 2024: #16

Post by Waldo »

Rank The Roster: 2024 Edition

1. Jordan Love (53%)[+8]
2. Rashan Gary (36%)[+3]
3. Jaire Alexander (48%)[-2]
4. Zach Tom (27%)[+13]
5. Kenny Clark (33%)[-1]
6. Xavier McKinney (35%)[FA]
7. Elgton Jenkins (47%)[-1]
8. Josh Jacobs (43%)[FA]
9. Jayden Reed (36%)[+18]
10T. Christian Watson (24%)[-2]
10T. Dontayvion Wicks (24%)[+21]
12T. Preston Smith (27%)[-2]
12T. Devonte Wyatt (27%)[+4]
14. Quay Walker (40%)[--]
15. Luke Musgrave (28%)[+7]
16. Current (xx%)[--]

Percent of vote the winner got will be in parenthesis, position change vs. 2023 will be in brackets.

Here's how this works:

Each day there is a new thread/poll, starting at #1, on down to whereever we get. The whole point of this exercise is to have something to talk about in the lean news months to carry us to camp. Each poll will be open for voting for 24 hours. New threads will only be created on weekdays. Ties will cause a runoff poll. You may vote up to TWO players (a change that was made mid-poll last year, seemed to work well).

Simply voting is not enough!

Post why you voted for who you did and provide a player to add to the next poll (every poll will be a list of 15-20 guys, new players added in bunches every few days).

Here's the thing. There is no criteria. This is an exercise to foster discussion therefore there are no clear criteria for ranking. Who is better right now? Who will have the best season? Who was better last year? Sort of a combo of them all? Do you take positional value into account? It really doesn't matter.

Previous Years:
Rank the Roster: 2023
Rank the Roster: 2022
Rank the Roster: 2021
Rank the Roster: 2020
Rank the Roster: 2014-2019

User avatar
Waldo
Reactions:
Posts: 958
Joined: 19 Mar 2020 10:33

Post by Waldo »

LVN and Stokes, who I think is going to grab the #2 CB spot.

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 12799
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

LVN and Tucker Kraft. Little more concerend about Kraft's injury.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13638
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

Doubs again.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
Labrev
Reactions:
Posts: 6258
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 00:01

Post by Labrev »

Folks, I get that Doubs does not have the explosive playmaking of a Reed, Wicks, or Watson, but the poor guy catches a lot of balls every damn game and has great rapport with QB1. His game may not be sexy, but his yardage does not count any less to our total offense than the other WRs.

As to the idea that WR4 cannot be ranked this high... what gives people the idea that there will be some clear hierarchy between our top four WRs, where Doubs will get significantly less snaps than whoever is third? Leaving aside the impact of injuries, WRs 1-4 will probably not have any major disparity in snaps between themselves.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”
—Magneto

User avatar
Pckfn23
Reactions:
Posts: 13638
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
Location: Western Wisconsin

Post by Pckfn23 »

My take has always been that I do not know which of the 4 WRs will emerge as our top 2/3 this season. Any one of the 4 could.
Image
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."

User avatar
APB
Reactions:
Posts: 7114
Joined: 20 Mar 2020 06:53
Location: Virginia

Post by APB »

Labrev wrote:
24 May 2024 13:37
Folks, I get that Doubs does not have the explosive playmaking of a Reed, Wicks, or Watson, but the poor guy catches a lot of balls every damn game and has great rapport with QB1. His game may not be sexy, but his yardage does not count any less to our total offense than the other WRs.

As to the idea that WR4 cannot be ranked this high... what gives people the idea that there will be some clear hierarchy between our top four WRs, where Doubs will get significantly less snaps than whoever is third? Leaving aside the impact of injuries, WRs 1-4 will probably not have any major disparity in snaps between themselves.
If Doubs gets injured, would the offense miss a beat? I think not. Dude makes some plays, no doubt and I like him a lot, but the plays would still be made whether he's on the field or not. He's a terrific option as WR4 but he's still WR4.

I'm going Valentine, who I believe grabs that CB2 position and runs with it, along with Rasheed Walker who I believe remains the starter at LT. Two STARTERS (yes, I presume...but it's my vote...bite me) at premier positions still on the board.

User avatar
Cdragon
Reactions:
Posts: 2621
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 05:18
Location: Robert Brook's home town

Post by Cdragon »

LVN and Walker.

User avatar
Backthepack4ever
Reactions:
Posts: 1019
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:19
Contact:

Post by Backthepack4ever »

LVN for reasons I voted the last few times


Next was tough but with the talk that Stokes is looking in the best shape in his career he's gonna get every shot at cb2 and if he plays even at his rookie level the guy will make a a big contribution

Hard to put him over doubs but cbs matter also.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 7733
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Doubs and Kraft, then LVN and the OTs and CBs.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

User avatar
TheSkeptic
Reactions:
Posts: 2144
Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37

Post by TheSkeptic »

LVN #1 and Valentine #2

Stokes on deck

User avatar
Crazylegs Starks
Reactions:
Posts: 3400
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 21:50
Location: Northern WI

Post by Crazylegs Starks »

Doubs
“We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.”
- Vince Lombardi

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9486
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

I'm struggling so much hereto figure out where to go.

There are a lot of very likely solid starters--Nixon, Doubs, Myers

There are a lot of guys who if they win the starting spot might be in that former group--Morgan and Walker, Valentine and Stokes, Cooper...


And then there are the guys who have the highest variance outcomes; guys who may be nothingburger role player or who may break out. I think rookies like Bullard and Cooper or a handful of other guys are likely starter/role players, but if they hit could really be difference makers.

I gave a vote to a solid starter type (Doubs) and to a "if this hits, it HITS" guy in Bullard. At this junction, I really still prefer the latter category: guys who could be difference makers IF they hit, and guys I believe in. LVN is another in that category. The fun of a no-specific-criteria vote is determining how we value these different player variances.

MY_TAKE
Reactions:
Posts: 672
Joined: 14 Sep 2023 04:46

Post by MY_TAKE »

Labrev wrote:
24 May 2024 13:37
Folks, I get that Doubs does not have the explosive playmaking of a Reed, Wicks, or Watson, but the poor guy catches a lot of balls every damn game and has great rapport with QB1. His game may not be sexy, but his yardage does not count any less to our total offense than the other WRs.

As to the idea that WR4 cannot be ranked this high... what gives people the idea that there will be some clear hierarchy between our top four WRs, where Doubs will get significantly less snaps than whoever is third? Leaving aside the impact of injuries, WRs 1-4 will probably not have any major disparity in snaps between themselves.
Doubs.
I feel like Doubs has more explosive playmaking then some think. I have watched him beat corners deep many times and unfortunately the QB wasn't always able to get him the ball. He has a little Greg Jennings in him. I watched some youtube on him tonight and he is an impactful player. I knew this but I had to be reminded. I agree with #23 that any of the 4 WR could emerge as the top 2 targets. I think all are really good and weirdly all of them impact at the position differently.

User avatar
Pugger
Reactions:
Posts: 4321
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 18:34
Location: Punta Gorda, FL

Post by Pugger »

Hi fellas. I'm back. I was absent for a couple of weeks because we moved. We found a wonderful condo a few miles north of where we were before.

It is interesting to see your rankings this year. I have a lot of catching up to do here... :lol:

User avatar
RingoCStarrQB
Reactions:
Posts: 3625
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56

Post by RingoCStarrQB »

Pugger wrote:
25 May 2024 17:51
Hi fellas. I'm back. I was absent for a couple of weeks because we moved. We found a wonderful condo a few miles north of where we were before.

It is interesting to see your rankings this year. I have a lot of catching up to do here... :lol:
Hope your move went well. That can be stressful sometimes. GO PACKERS!!

User avatar
RingoCStarrQB
Reactions:
Posts: 3625
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56

Post by RingoCStarrQB »

MY_TAKE wrote:
24 May 2024 23:50
Labrev wrote:
24 May 2024 13:37
Folks, I get that Doubs does not have the explosive playmaking of a Reed, Wicks, or Watson, but the poor guy catches a lot of balls every damn game and has great rapport with QB1. His game may not be sexy, but his yardage does not count any less to our total offense than the other WRs.

As to the idea that WR4 cannot be ranked this high... what gives people the idea that there will be some clear hierarchy between our top four WRs, where Doubs will get significantly less snaps than whoever is third? Leaving aside the impact of injuries, WRs 1-4 will probably not have any major disparity in snaps between themselves.
Doubs.
I feel like Doubs has more explosive playmaking then some think. I have watched him beat corners deep many times and unfortunately the QB wasn't always able to get him the ball. He has a little Greg Jennings in him. I watched some youtube on him tonight and he is an impactful player. I knew this but I had to be reminded. I agree with #23 that any of the 4 WR could emerge as the top 2 targets. I think all are really good and weirdly all of them impact at the position differently.
I watched the replay of the 2022 game vs. Dallas when Christian Watson dropped a couple of passes early, and then scored 3 TDs. The route running that broke Watson free on these plays were based on his speed and ability to separate from unprepared Dallas DBs. Doubs, Reed, Wicks along with Watson and Musgrave (what the heck through Toure and Melton in there if they can make the team) could be the second coming of Jennings, Driver, Jones, Finley and Jordy. Musgrave and Craft have some work to do to prove they belong in the Chmura-Jackson conversation. Let's hope so.

Post Reply