Packers Sign Mecole Hardman
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5792
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Want to see the numbers. Regardless this is a good move. You get an actual deep threat who can track the ball, make plays in the open field, and return the ball getting Nixon off the duty for CB purposes. I expect to see Bo probably released come camp. Too many small guys with the same purpose.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14269
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Didn’t love, but like him a lot in the draft.
Thought KC was as such an ideal fit too, took him real early in our dynasty draft.
Just never panned out though.
Camp body can’t hurt, see if he provides some ST value or maybe something plus on the offensive side.
Love taking this gamble vs trading for Deebo for a pick and his salary.
Thought KC was as such an ideal fit too, took him real early in our dynasty draft.
Just never panned out though.
Camp body can’t hurt, see if he provides some ST value or maybe something plus on the offensive side.
Love taking this gamble vs trading for Deebo for a pick and his salary.


We need a return specialist if Nixon is going to ditch that role. That alone makes this worthwhile. He also gives us some depth at receiver which we could use, probably didn't cost much. A bit of a redundant skill set with Reed and Bo as a small fast primarily-slot guy, but whatever, again probably didn't cost us much.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14269
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
I think I'm done with the Bo Melton experience. I get Hardman doesn't provide much unkown upside, but his floor, as low as it is, is way higher than Meltons.
Frankly I'm hoping Melton and Heath both aren't on the roster, just means we tried to improve the bottom of the roster.
Frankly I'm hoping Melton and Heath both aren't on the roster, just means we tried to improve the bottom of the roster.


Wasn’t Hardman primarily an outside guy? I know Reid would move him inside from time to time, especially for those gadget end-around type plays, but I thought his primary position was outside? Could be mistaken…Labrev wrote: ↑18 Mar 2025 19:23We need a return specialist if Nixon is going to ditch that role. That alone makes this worthwhile. He also gives us some depth at receiver which we could use, probably didn't cost much. A bit of a redundant skill set with Reed and Bo as a small fast primarily-slot guy, but whatever, again probably didn't cost us much.
Can’t imagine this is much more than a minimum deal. Moves the needle for me slightly more than Melton, as well. I like the KR aspect of the signing also.

Read More. Post Less.
Mecole Hardman was actually really fun to watch until like 2023/2024. His highlight tape of 2019 - 2022 is very different than 2024's.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14269
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
I asked grok how he’ll do.
Predicting Mecole Hardman's performance with the Green Bay Packers for the 2025 season involves some speculation, but we can make an educated guess based on his past performance, skill set, and the Packers' current roster dynamics.
Hardman, a speedy wide receiver and return specialist, signed a one-year deal with the Packers on March 18, 2025. His career highlights include a standout rookie year in 2019 with the Kansas City Chiefs, where he earned a Pro Bowl nod as a kick returner, averaging 26.1 yards per kickoff return with a 104-yard touchdown. As a receiver, his best season came in 2021, when he recorded 59 catches for 693 yards and 2 touchdowns. However, his production has dipped in recent years, with less than 300 receiving yards in each of the last three seasons, including just 12 catches for 90 yards in 2024 before a knee injury sidelined him.
With the Packers, Hardman joins a receiver group featuring Jayden Reed, Romeo Doubs, Dontayvion Wicks, and the injured Christian Watson, who is expected to miss the early part of the 2025 season due to a torn ACL. This injury could open up opportunities for Hardman, particularly as a deep-threat option with his 4.33-second 40-yard dash speed. Coach Matt LaFleur’s offense, which often utilizes motion and jet sweeps, could also suit Hardman’s gadget-player skill set. Additionally, with Keisean Nixon potentially stepping away from kick returns to focus on defense, Hardman could reclaim a significant role on special teams.
That said, Hardman has never been a primary receiver, even with Patrick Mahomes throwing to him in Kansas City. The Packers’ passing game revolves around quarterback Jordan Love, who spreads the ball around to a versatile but not elite receiver corps. Hardman’s offensive role might be limited to a complementary piece—think 20-30 targets—unless he capitalizes on Watson’s absence to carve out a bigger niche.
A reasonable prediction for Hardman’s 2025 season with the Packers might look like this:
- **Receiving:** 25-35 catches, 300-400 yards, 2-3 touchdowns. This assumes he gets occasional deep shots and some underneath work in LaFleur’s scheme.
- **Rushing:** 5-10 carries, 50-75 yards, possibly 1 touchdown, given his history with jet sweeps.
- **Special Teams:** 20-25 punt returns (averaging 9-10 yards) and 15-20 kickoff returns (averaging 23-25 yards), with a chance for a return touchdown if he regains his 2019 form.
The ceiling could be higher—say, 50 catches for 600 yards—if he gels with Love and Watson’s recovery lags. The floor, however, might resemble his recent Chiefs seasons: minimal offensive impact (15-20 catches, under 200 yards) with most of his value on special teams. His success will hinge on staying healthy, adapting to a new system, and seizing early opportunities. Given his one-year deal, this is a prove-it season for Hardman, so motivation won’t be an issue. Expect a modest but noticeable contribution, leaning heavily on his speed and return skills.


I stand corrected.
Based on his 2024 play, it looks like Hardman was strictly an inside/slot/gadget play receiver. None of his receptions from this past year went downfield. It was all pump passes from motion crossing Mahomes face or designed WR screens thrown at/behind the LOS. I don't think I saw anything directed at Hardman more than ~5 yds downfield which suggests, to me, that the elite 4.33 40 combine speed component is all but gone.
So yeah, he's not moving the needle.
Based on his 2024 play, it looks like Hardman was strictly an inside/slot/gadget play receiver. None of his receptions from this past year went downfield. It was all pump passes from motion crossing Mahomes face or designed WR screens thrown at/behind the LOS. I don't think I saw anything directed at Hardman more than ~5 yds downfield which suggests, to me, that the elite 4.33 40 combine speed component is all but gone.
So yeah, he's not moving the needle.
Yeah that's what I was watching last night too. The plays he made in 2024 were very uninspiring. They were designed plays to a gadget WR and like you said...appears to look like his speed is gone which is why he is generating zero interest from the league.APB wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 07:24I stand corrected.
Based on his 2024 play, it looks like Hardman was strictly an inside/slot/gadget play receiver. None of his receptions from this past year went downfield. It was all pump passes from motion crossing Mahomes face or designed WR screens thrown at/behind the LOS. I don't think I saw anything directed at Hardman more than ~5 yds downfield which suggests, to me, that the elite 4.33 40 combine speed component is all but gone.
So yeah, he's not moving the needle.
If we had any semblence of 2019 - 2021 Hardman...that would force defenses to pay when playing us heavy man. But I don't think that is what we will get.
A KC journo came on the latest Pack-a-Day episode, hosted by Ross Uglem, as a guest and said KC moved away from vertical routes in general because they were seeing lots of two-high defenses and made things more horizontal, so the lackluster production may have less to do with him and more their offensive design.
Hopefully whatever knee injuries that sidelined him last year didn't rob him of speed. And even if he lost some speed, when you run 4.33, you can lose a little speed but still be fast.
Hopefully whatever knee injuries that sidelined him last year didn't rob him of speed. And even if he lost some speed, when you run 4.33, you can lose a little speed but still be fast.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
OK, makes sense, a lot of offenses have done basically the same thing, however, look at the 5 or 6th play in that video, he had open field and was caught by a lber, IMO he's lost that quick step, he may still run fast once he gets to high gear, however, that pass play shows it takes him longer to get thereLabrev wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 08:49A KC journo came on the latest Pack-a-Day episode, hosted by Ross Uglem, as a guest and said KC moved away from vertical routes in general because they were seeing lots of two-high defenses and made things more horizontal, so the lackluster production may have less to do with him and more their offensive design.
Hopefully whatever knee injuries that sidelined him last year didn't rob him of speed. And even if he lost some speed, when you run 4.33, you can lose a little speed but still be fast.

we'll see, one play isn't enough proof he's lost it, but the lack of interest around the need for his speed league says he probably has.
lots of talk going around that Guty may break the mold and use slot 23 on a receiver, I'am taking it as a grain of salt shot right up my nose

most comments I've read say the top 4 or 5 will be over drafted and none are a true #1, even McMillian is considered by scouts to be a compliment or a #2, some consider 7 or 8 to be top 100, most drafts the last 5 years have twice that many in the top 100, so it is a weak WR class

Good catch. I didn't watch the clip. Could be other things, but there's definitely legitimate concern that he has really lost some explosiveness.Yoop wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 09:07OK, makes sense, a lot of offenses have done basically the same thing, however, look at the 5 or 6th play in that video, he had open field and was caught by a lber, IMO he's lost that quick step, he may still run fast once he gets to high gear, however, that pass play shows it takes him longer to get thereLabrev wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 08:49A KC journo came on the latest Pack-a-Day episode, hosted by Ross Uglem, as a guest and said KC moved away from vertical routes in general because they were seeing lots of two-high defenses and made things more horizontal, so the lackluster production may have less to do with him and more their offensive design.
Hopefully whatever knee injuries that sidelined him last year didn't rob him of speed. And even if he lost some speed, when you run 4.33, you can lose a little speed but still be fast.![]()
we'll see, one play isn't enough proof he's lost it, but the lack of interest around the need for his speed league says he probably has.
lots of talk going around that Guty may break the mold and use slot 23 on a receiver, I'am taking it as a grain of salt shot right up my nosecough, cough
most comments I've read say the top 4 or 5 will be over drafted and none are a true #1, even McMillian is considered by scouts to be a compliment or a #2, some consider 7 or 8 to be top 100, most drafts the last 5 years have twice that many in the top 100, so it is a weak WR class![]()
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
Btw, I think it may be a bit overstated how 'weak' this receiver class is. It definitely is not as impressive as last year with guys like MHJ, Nabers, Thomas, etc. or the year before which didn't have many elite prospects but had crazy depth. This class lacks elite prospects or depth, but there are still lots of options for teams that need WRs.
I think it could end up working in our favor. Teams loaded up on WR in the last two years, and this year they will be focused on 'stronger' positions like linemen on both sides, RBs, TEs, etc. That will (hopefully) help push the receiver prospects down and offer us some better value.
It's like how last year was a weak S class, but while everyone passed up the S prospects, we came away with three guys that upgraded the starters and depth for us from the year before.
I think it could end up working in our favor. Teams loaded up on WR in the last two years, and this year they will be focused on 'stronger' positions like linemen on both sides, RBs, TEs, etc. That will (hopefully) help push the receiver prospects down and offer us some better value.
It's like how last year was a weak S class, but while everyone passed up the S prospects, we came away with three guys that upgraded the starters and depth for us from the year before.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
Yeah I am trying to figure out the WR class as well.Labrev wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 10:11Btw, I think it may be a bit overstated how 'weak' this receiver class is. It definitely is not as impressive as last year with guys like MHJ, Nabers, Thomas, etc. or the year before which didn't have many elite prospects but had crazy depth. This class lacks elite prospects or depth, but there are still lots of options for teams that need WRs.
I think it could end up working in our favor. Teams loaded up on WR in the last two years, and this year they will be focused on 'stronger' positions like linemen on both sides, RBs, TEs, etc. That will (hopefully) help push the receiver prospects down and offer us some better value.
It's like how last year was a weak S class, but while everyone passed up the S prospects, we came away with three guys that upgraded the starters and depth for us from the year before.
Overall I don't love the top but I also don't love Day 2 which is usually where we find the meat of the WR group. Only guys I really like for us is Higgins and Royals on day 2. Lot of a love happening for Bech but I can't get the TCU thing out of my head. Even Elic from Stanford...I keep hearing poor route runner and that is usually a no-go for Green Bay.
Frankly I do like the Day 3 group. I think there are a number of guys that are intruiging like the Colorado State kid, Maryland kid, Tennessee kid. And that WR from Nebraska has all the traits you want. But they are Day 3 prospects for a reason.
It’s too early in the FA process to dismiss mecole as a “camp body”
Dude fills multiple needs and still has his speed and he’s actually been around winners and won a ring.
At minimum, he has a solid role in the o until Watson comes back healthy.
My guess is it’s in the $4-$6m range. A range firmly on the 53 man roster
Dude fills multiple needs and still has his speed and he’s actually been around winners and won a ring.
At minimum, he has a solid role in the o until Watson comes back healthy.
My guess is it’s in the $4-$6m range. A range firmly on the 53 man roster
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 622
- Joined: 27 Mar 2020 22:22
agree on the price but hopefully not much of a signing bonus. I don't see him as a lock to make the teamDrj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 11:13It’s too early in the FA process to dismiss mecole as a “camp body”
Dude fills multiple needs and still has his speed and he’s actually been around winners and won a ring.
At minimum, he has a solid role in the o until Watson comes back healthy.
My guess is it’s in the $4-$6m range. A range firmly on the 53 man roster
I'd be surprised if it's that much. My guess is $4 million is top end as GB had to outbid KC.Drj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 11:13It’s too early in the FA process to dismiss mecole as a “camp body”
Dude fills multiple needs and still has his speed and he’s actually been around winners and won a ring.
At minimum, he has a solid role in the o until Watson comes back healthy.
My guess is it’s in the $4-$6m range. A range firmly on the 53 man roster
After his rookie deal, Hardman had two contract:
1. 2023 - 1 year with NYJ/KC for $4 million
2. 2024 - 1 year with KC for $1.125 million
And I wouldn't say he has done anything to increase his value in that time.
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4524
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
Oh how I long for the days of Jermichael, Driver, Jones, Jennings and Jordy.Madcity_matt wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 11:40agree on the price but hopefully not much of a signing bonus. I don't see him as a lock to make the teamDrj820 wrote: ↑19 Mar 2025 11:13It’s too early in the FA process to dismiss mecole as a “camp body”
Dude fills multiple needs and still has his speed and he’s actually been around winners and won a ring.
At minimum, he has a solid role in the o until Watson comes back healthy.
My guess is it’s in the $4-$6m range. A range firmly on the 53 man roster