Certifiable. This is almost on par with Lizard People.NO YOU posted it because like Herman ya like to rag on Rodgers, you drag his convoluted Grades here for just that purpose after every game.
Green Bay Packers News 2023
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14463
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Haha wow Quay is 10000x better than Oren burks.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
Yeah I definitely think the instincts are there. I attribute most of Quay's issues to lack of football experience. He played considerably better when he didn't have as many responsibilities and could just go with his single assignment.
That could improve. But I am also prepared it just never clicks.
ehhhhh, I think as a rookie he's better then some give him credit for.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023 10:32Herman graded Quay poorly. PFF graded him poorly at 51.9. Not sure what else needs to be argued here.
There’s tons of room for improvement. He’s lengthy and athletic and good in coverage which you don’t see much from LBs in general.
I’ll say one thing that is a definite negative knock on him is the lack of instincts. Hes got to get better at diagnosing the play which will come in time but for a 1st round LB you typically see more in that department than what we got in Quay. Ultimately this season I didn’t see much difference between him and Oren Burks. Just an athletic freak so far.
I know what Packers wire said Lupe, which basically ehco's your comment,, but for 9 games Walkers was very good, the comments concerning lack of instincts simply don't add up, his fails to not fill a gap had more to do with NO ONE slowing down blockers then Quay lacking instincts to avoid them, heres what Bleacher report had to say.
The 3-6 Green Bay Packers are not playing well, and their 27th-ranked scoring offense has been particularly problematic. In hindsight, Green Bay probably should have made a better effort to find quarterback Aaron Rodgers a reliable pass-catcher in the draft.
That's not Quay Walker's fault, however, and the 22nd overall pick out of Georgia has done his job as well as could be expected. He has started eight of nine games and been on the field for 74 percent of the defensive snaps while playing well against both the run and the pass.
Walker has logged 62 tackles, 40 solo stops, two tackles for loss, two passes defended and two forced fumbles. He's allowed an opposing passer rating of only 72.5 while being credited with a mere three missed tackles (a 4.6 percent miss rate).
While Green Bay has struggled against the run (4.8 yards per carry allowed), Walker has been one of the few consistent defenders on the field each week. The season isn't going as expected for the Packers, but Walker has been everything Green Bay could hope for in an off-ball linebacker.
Grade: A
agree, some, he was asked to play MLB, a position he probably does lack experience at, but he still had 40 solo tackles in 9 games with over 60 total, no way he's going to bust out, why is it people question my opinion that ILB is such a easy college to pro transition, Walker was better then Hawk, Barnett, and every other rookie lber I've seen in 40 years.go pak go wrote: ↑22 Jan 2023 11:16Yeah I definitely think the instincts are there. I attribute most of Quay's issues to lack of football experience. He played considerably better when he didn't have as many responsibilities and could just go with his single assignment.
That could improve. But I am also prepared it just never clicks.
Packer fans in this forum are the worst critics of Packer players to be found on any message board
I honestly don’t think I ever honed in my eye on Oren burks and didn’t see him do something incredibly stupid, despite his obvious physical traits. Preseason or in season, when I was watching, he was doing something dumb.
At linebacker that is, he wasn’t a bad STer
At linebacker that is, he wasn’t a bad STer
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
no kidding, it's a insult to the naked eye to mention Burks lber skills in the same sentence as Quay Walker, someone should book Lupe with a optometrist appointment
obviously there have been better ILB's drafted the last 40 years or so, just not by the GBPers
I thought the reason he brought the grades was to talk about them, I guess not, what where suppose to do is just accept them and go on our way.
for the 2nd time I understand Hermans convoluted bull &%$@ grades.
ya know what baffles me is that YOU don't think dragging cartoons to vent your opinion on any thing is not Hijacking posts.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14463
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
I think he lives in a perpetual state of insult.it's a insult
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
You guys are rough on an old many that puffs the whacky tobaccy and fires off takes from the hip. Yal will miss him when he moves on.
Rock on Yoop.
Rock on Yoop.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14463
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Let's take a look at what PFF has for grades on our players (Herman's grades after):
Love - 78.7 - +.55
Rodgers - 77.5 (14th/39) - +.20
Toure - 49.3 - +.15
Lazard - 69.0 (53rd/121) - +2.70
Cobb - 70.1 (46th/121) - +.20
Doubs - 62.6 (93rd/121) - -1.50
Watson - 77.1 (25th/121) - +3.95
Taylor - 61.6 - +.55
Dillon - 81.4 (10th/60) - +1.85
Jones - 86.1 (6th/60) - +5.25
Lewis - 65.6 (24th/74) - +4.25
Deguara - 57.2 (52nd/74) - +.90
Tonyan - 57.5 (51st/74) - -2.25
Davis - 56.7 - -1.85
Myers - 60.4 (27th/38) - -4.15
Hanson - 47.2 - -1.90
Runyan - 62.6 (38th/78) - -2.15
Newman - 57.5 (53rd/78) - -5.80
Tom - 68.3 (41st/83) - +.10
Jenkins - 72.3 (13th/78) - -.45
Nijman - 63.1 (57th/83) - -2.40
Bakhtiari - 79.8 (11th/83) - +4.05
Gaines - 49.7 - -.25
Ballentine - 46.0 - -.40
Alexander - 80.3 (7th/118) - +.80
Nixon - 63.9 - +.65
Douglas - 71.7 (31st/118) - -1.00
Stokes - 53.7 (104th/118) - -3.65
Ford - 77.7 (10th/88) - +.45
Carpenter - 63.4 - -.25
Leavitt - 59.9
Savage - 47.5 (87th/88) - -5.20
Amos - 54.2 (79th/88) - -3.75
Jean-Charles - 62.2 - +.05
Wilson - 56.3 - -.60
Barnes - 46.7 - -.55
Walker - 51.9 (70th/81) - -3.40
Campbell - 74.2 (18th/81) - -1.70
McDuffie - 58.6 - -.85
Wyatt - 69.9 - +.90
Reed - 61.9 (58th/125) - +.90
Slaton - 61.7 (60th/125) - +.30
Lowry - 59.3 (68th/125) - -1.05
Clark - 66.4 (42nd/125) - +4.40
Hollins - 54.0 (105th/120) - -1.25
Enagbare - 61.4 (81st/120) - -1.90
Gary - 82.9 (17th/120) - +4.40
Smith - 66.4 (56th/120) - -2.45
Hamilton - 35.6 - -.75
Garvin - 50.6 - -3.15
Crosby - 72.4
O'Donnell - 59.0
Coco - 60.0
Don't freak out about anything, just compiling them all together because without paying you have to look at each player individually.
Love - 78.7 - +.55
Rodgers - 77.5 (14th/39) - +.20
Toure - 49.3 - +.15
Lazard - 69.0 (53rd/121) - +2.70
Cobb - 70.1 (46th/121) - +.20
Doubs - 62.6 (93rd/121) - -1.50
Watson - 77.1 (25th/121) - +3.95
Taylor - 61.6 - +.55
Dillon - 81.4 (10th/60) - +1.85
Jones - 86.1 (6th/60) - +5.25
Lewis - 65.6 (24th/74) - +4.25
Deguara - 57.2 (52nd/74) - +.90
Tonyan - 57.5 (51st/74) - -2.25
Davis - 56.7 - -1.85
Myers - 60.4 (27th/38) - -4.15
Hanson - 47.2 - -1.90
Runyan - 62.6 (38th/78) - -2.15
Newman - 57.5 (53rd/78) - -5.80
Tom - 68.3 (41st/83) - +.10
Jenkins - 72.3 (13th/78) - -.45
Nijman - 63.1 (57th/83) - -2.40
Bakhtiari - 79.8 (11th/83) - +4.05
Gaines - 49.7 - -.25
Ballentine - 46.0 - -.40
Alexander - 80.3 (7th/118) - +.80
Nixon - 63.9 - +.65
Douglas - 71.7 (31st/118) - -1.00
Stokes - 53.7 (104th/118) - -3.65
Ford - 77.7 (10th/88) - +.45
Carpenter - 63.4 - -.25
Leavitt - 59.9
Savage - 47.5 (87th/88) - -5.20
Amos - 54.2 (79th/88) - -3.75
Jean-Charles - 62.2 - +.05
Wilson - 56.3 - -.60
Barnes - 46.7 - -.55
Walker - 51.9 (70th/81) - -3.40
Campbell - 74.2 (18th/81) - -1.70
McDuffie - 58.6 - -.85
Wyatt - 69.9 - +.90
Reed - 61.9 (58th/125) - +.90
Slaton - 61.7 (60th/125) - +.30
Lowry - 59.3 (68th/125) - -1.05
Clark - 66.4 (42nd/125) - +4.40
Hollins - 54.0 (105th/120) - -1.25
Enagbare - 61.4 (81st/120) - -1.90
Gary - 82.9 (17th/120) - +4.40
Smith - 66.4 (56th/120) - -2.45
Hamilton - 35.6 - -.75
Garvin - 50.6 - -3.15
Crosby - 72.4
O'Donnell - 59.0
Coco - 60.0
Don't freak out about anything, just compiling them all together because without paying you have to look at each player individually.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
What is neutral for PFF? Is it 60?
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5325
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Yes.
60 is average. 70 is above average. 80 is a good player. 90 is elite.
50 is below average. 40 and below is bad.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
I fully intend to, why would I move on
and what are you babbling on about, least I don't come strolling in here 2 sheits to the wind dragging along PFF and Hermies grades to make points because without them I don't know what the hell to think about what I just watched during the game I actually have a mind of my own to formulate a opinion about the ability of the Walkers on our team.
the real laugher will come when Rodgers goes to another team next year and goes to the play offs as we try and figure who our next QB will be, seriously, obviously, I hope thats not the case, but it stands just as much a chance to be right as LOve does being our savior at QB
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14463
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
The 60s they consider average, yes. 60 the low end of average. I would say 65 specifically would be their average.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."