LaFleur's 2024 To-do list
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2934
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
LaFleur's 2024 To-do list
Matt is a list guy, for sure. Every good HC is. What does he need to do to make the 2024 Packers better than the 2023 Packers.
1. Communicate the need to every player and coach to improve in the off season. (This was easy because he has already started this.)
2. Turn Jordan Love from the guy who threw that last INT against SF into the guy who finishes that drive against SF with POINTS.
3. Fire Joe Barry. His value (or lack thereof) was proven in two ways. First, he went into "prevent" on that last drive against SF, enabling them to score a TD, and second when he did finally keep offenses guessing, the D performed well. Joe refuses to do that nearly often enough. Nuf sed about dat.
4. Figure a way to get enough touches for ALL of our skill players. That wasn't an issue in 2023 because they are all young and hungry (except for Jones, but he's humble anyhow). But in 2024, egos will start to step up and more guys will want more touches. How to manage that... I suppose, for now, this is a good problem to have.
1. Communicate the need to every player and coach to improve in the off season. (This was easy because he has already started this.)
2. Turn Jordan Love from the guy who threw that last INT against SF into the guy who finishes that drive against SF with POINTS.
3. Fire Joe Barry. His value (or lack thereof) was proven in two ways. First, he went into "prevent" on that last drive against SF, enabling them to score a TD, and second when he did finally keep offenses guessing, the D performed well. Joe refuses to do that nearly often enough. Nuf sed about dat.
4. Figure a way to get enough touches for ALL of our skill players. That wasn't an issue in 2023 because they are all young and hungry (except for Jones, but he's humble anyhow). But in 2024, egos will start to step up and more guys will want more touches. How to manage that... I suppose, for now, this is a good problem to have.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
To me his #1 priority is to gain more consistency in the redzone. Two years in a row now this team has been pretty bad in the redzone IMO. Last year they didn’t have the passing weapons I felt. This year they couldn’t run the ball.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Red zone may have been middling but goal to go, we typically dominated. Like insane dominated. I think 20 of 21… until San Francisco.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑23 Jan 2024 21:16To me his #1 priority is to gain more consistency in the redzone. Two years in a row now this team has been pretty bad in the redzone IMO. Last year they didn’t have the passing weapons I felt. This year they couldn’t run the ball.
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
How many years has it been now since the Packers had a training staff that knew how to prevent hamstring problems? MLF needs to hire someone specifically for this, as apparently other teams do not have this problem. I can't remember when I saw a player from another team grabbing their hamstring as Jones and Watson did this season.
It would be easy to fire Barry. Finding a replacement will not be so easy. And make no mistake about a replacement DC, he could be worse. All you have to do is to look at the highly rated Cowboys DC and Al Harris and what Love and MLF did to them to see how much worse.
Apparently Bakh wants to play again. It should not be a difficult decision to tell him no, but it probably will be difficult to make that decision. Selling that decision to the team could be very difficult should he return. 39 million dollars is money that should go to the future, not to a washed up OT.
I don't know if the HC submits an evaluation of every player on the team or PS or IR to the GM prior to the draft. But he should, with input from the DC and position coaches. Starting with the FA's as the decision on who to resign should be soon. Decide on Dillon and JRJ and Savage. None are great players but all of them are depth and would be good backups.
The Packers now know what they have in Love and Reed and Kraft and Musgrave and Wicks and Melton. The playbook needs to be adjusted to now that MLF knows what they are capable of.
It would be easy to fire Barry. Finding a replacement will not be so easy. And make no mistake about a replacement DC, he could be worse. All you have to do is to look at the highly rated Cowboys DC and Al Harris and what Love and MLF did to them to see how much worse.
Apparently Bakh wants to play again. It should not be a difficult decision to tell him no, but it probably will be difficult to make that decision. Selling that decision to the team could be very difficult should he return. 39 million dollars is money that should go to the future, not to a washed up OT.
I don't know if the HC submits an evaluation of every player on the team or PS or IR to the GM prior to the draft. But he should, with input from the DC and position coaches. Starting with the FA's as the decision on who to resign should be soon. Decide on Dillon and JRJ and Savage. None are great players but all of them are depth and would be good backups.
The Packers now know what they have in Love and Reed and Kraft and Musgrave and Wicks and Melton. The playbook needs to be adjusted to now that MLF knows what they are capable of.
- williewasgreat
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1666
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 05:29
After the work MLF did this year, this is a ridiculous thing to say. You really need to let it go!
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4177
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
williewasgreat wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 04:12After the work MLF did this year, this is a ridiculous thing to say. You really need to let it go!
We need to dump the DC, not the HC, stay focusedRingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 06:24williewasgreat wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 04:12After the work MLF did this year, this is a ridiculous thing to say. You really need to let it go!
He meant re-sign.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 06:24williewasgreat wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 04:12After the work MLF did this year, this is a ridiculous thing to say. You really need to let it go!
Read More. Post Less.
It seems like an offseason to think about what to do with our two no longer rookie matchup problem TE's that can both play should make this a solvable problem.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑23 Jan 2024 21:16To me his #1 priority is to gain more consistency in the redzone. Two years in a row now this team has been pretty bad in the redzone IMO. Last year they didn’t have the passing weapons I felt. This year they couldn’t run the ball.
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
I think that will definitely help. I just really think they need to get better at running the ball and that starts with the line. Obviously Jones missed a ton of time too which hurt us. That could just be the answer there but with how the RBs struggled and the grades from PFF the run blocking was really bad up front. That needs to improve.Waldo wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:44It seems like an offseason to think about what to do with our two no longer rookie matchup problem TE's that can both play should make this a solvable problem.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑23 Jan 2024 21:16To me his #1 priority is to gain more consistency in the redzone. Two years in a row now this team has been pretty bad in the redzone IMO. Last year they didn’t have the passing weapons I felt. This year they couldn’t run the ball.
Then from there play action to TEs in the redzone would dominate.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
Still need that Juszczek guy. I can't believe it can be that difficult of a thing to find, but a capable lead blocker, ball carrier, and pass catcher. I would live in 22 personnel in the redzone and you could do anything from bully-ball in the run game to splitting out 5-wide with that group.Waldo wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:44It seems like an offseason to think about what to do with our two no longer rookie matchup problem TE's that can both play should make this a solvable problem.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑23 Jan 2024 21:16To me his #1 priority is to gain more consistency in the redzone. Two years in a row now this team has been pretty bad in the redzone IMO. Last year they didn’t have the passing weapons I felt. This year they couldn’t run the ball.
Read More. Post Less.
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
I think Kraft can do all that and you play Musgrave as the TE in those formations.NCF wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:51Still need that Juszczek guy. I can't believe it can be that difficult of a thing to find, but a capable lead blocker, ball carrier, and pass catcher. I would live in 22 personnel in the redzone and you could do anything from bully-ball in the run game to splitting out 5-wide with that group.Waldo wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:44It seems like an offseason to think about what to do with our two no longer rookie matchup problem TE's that can both play should make this a solvable problem.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑23 Jan 2024 21:16To me his #1 priority is to gain more consistency in the redzone. Two years in a row now this team has been pretty bad in the redzone IMO. Last year they didn’t have the passing weapons I felt. This year they couldn’t run the ball.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Was gunna say the same. Maybe not the line-up in the backfield lead blocker quality that Juszczek will bring you, but I'd argue a guy like Kraft is actually more valuable. Or at least perhaps he can be.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:54I think Kraft can do all that and you play Musgrave as the TE in those formations.NCF wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:51Still need that Juszczek guy. I can't believe it can be that difficult of a thing to find, but a capable lead blocker, ball carrier, and pass catcher. I would live in 22 personnel in the redzone and you could do anything from bully-ball in the run game to splitting out 5-wide with that group.
IMO most impressive things from both Kraft and Musgrave this year was their blocking, more impressive than their receiving I thought they both be bigger weapons.
Jones's 4 straight 100+ yard games backs that up. Those guys (Kraft in particular) were balling end of the year in the run game.
If you think Kraft is that guy, then you need another TE that is more versatile/dangerous than a Ben Sims. My point is inside the 10, I really only want one WR on the field.BF004 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 09:01Was gunna say the same. Maybe not the line-up in the backfield lead blocker quality that Juszczek will bring you, but I'd argue a guy like Kraft is actually more valuable. Or at least perhaps he can be.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:54I think Kraft can do all that and you play Musgrave as the TE in those formations.NCF wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:51
Still need that Juszczek guy. I can't believe it can be that difficult of a thing to find, but a capable lead blocker, ball carrier, and pass catcher. I would live in 22 personnel in the redzone and you could do anything from bully-ball in the run game to splitting out 5-wide with that group.
IMO most impressive things from both Kraft and Musgrave this year was their blocking, more impressive than their receiving I thought they both be bigger weapons.
Jones's 4 straight 100+ yard games backs that up. Those guys (Kraft in particular) were balling end of the year in the run game.
Read More. Post Less.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14475
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
We were 19 for 20 in goal to go situations with Jordan loving completing 11 of 18 for 11 TDs. EVERY completed pass was a TD. We had the best TD% in those situations with 19 TDs and 1 FG.
In the red zone Love threw 3 INTs, most in the league, and completed only 53.76% of passes. He had the 2nd most red zone passing TDs with 24. As a team we were 53.33% in red zone TDs, 17th in the league. Up from 2022's 51.85%
In the red zone Love threw 3 INTs, most in the league, and completed only 53.76% of passes. He had the 2nd most red zone passing TDs with 24. As a team we were 53.33% in red zone TDs, 17th in the league. Up from 2022's 51.85%
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
so in other words you want to tell the defense, where gonna run, just try and stop us, we gonna butt kick youNCF wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 09:07If you think Kraft is that guy, then you need another TE that is more versatile/dangerous than a Ben Sims. My point is inside the 10, I really only want one WR on the field.BF004 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 09:01Was gunna say the same. Maybe not the line-up in the backfield lead blocker quality that Juszczek will bring you, but I'd argue a guy like Kraft is actually more valuable. Or at least perhaps he can be.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:54
I think Kraft can do all that and you play Musgrave as the TE in those formations.
IMO most impressive things from both Kraft and Musgrave this year was their blocking, more impressive than their receiving I thought they both be bigger weapons.
Jones's 4 straight 100+ yard games backs that up. Those guys (Kraft in particular) were balling end of the year in the run game.
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5327
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Ehh. I’d be ok with that but I would just play Watson close to in-line. He’s a pretty good blocker and has the size to make the redzone just a little bigger and obviously the speed helps.NCF wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 09:07If you think Kraft is that guy, then you need another TE that is more versatile/dangerous than a Ben Sims. My point is inside the 10, I really only want one WR on the field.BF004 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 09:01Was gunna say the same. Maybe not the line-up in the backfield lead blocker quality that Juszczek will bring you, but I'd argue a guy like Kraft is actually more valuable. Or at least perhaps he can be.lupedafiasco wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 08:54
I think Kraft can do all that and you play Musgrave as the TE in those formations.
IMO most impressive things from both Kraft and Musgrave this year was their blocking, more impressive than their receiving I thought they both be bigger weapons.
Jones's 4 straight 100+ yard games backs that up. Those guys (Kraft in particular) were balling end of the year in the run game.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
That's just it. I don't want the threat of the run, I want to excel at the run... and the pass. I want to be able to score both ways, at will, and in so many different ways using the same personnel grouping. Is that so much to ask for?Yoop wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 09:27so in other words you want to tell the defense, where gonna run, just try and stop us, we gonna butt kick youNCF wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 09:07If you think Kraft is that guy, then you need another TE that is more versatile/dangerous than a Ben Sims. My point is inside the 10, I really only want one WR on the field.BF004 wrote: ↑24 Jan 2024 09:01
Was gunna say the same. Maybe not the line-up in the backfield lead blocker quality that Juszczek will bring you, but I'd argue a guy like Kraft is actually more valuable. Or at least perhaps he can be.
IMO most impressive things from both Kraft and Musgrave this year was their blocking, more impressive than their receiving I thought they both be bigger weapons.
Jones's 4 straight 100+ yard games backs that up. Those guys (Kraft in particular) were balling end of the year in the run game.
Read More. Post Less.