Most likely the Packers will have a new safety and a new starting ILB in addition to definitely having a new D coordinator. There will be growing pains, but by mid season I expect the entire league will dread having to play the Packers.go pak go wrote: ↑16 Feb 2024 17:37No we usually suck in October - through mid November.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑16 Feb 2024 12:45Now that is positive. Maybe even overly-optimistic. I expect they will suck in September, only because they always do. But if they don't suck, it's gonna be a heckuva season for sure!Cdragon wrote: ↑14 Feb 2024 14:18I think one of the biggest things going forward is the amount of rookies who have gotten meaningful reps. And highly successful reps at that. They are going to be running into year 2 like it is their 3rd year. They know they can compete. I expect the offense to jump off the page early in the year!
2023 packers positivity only 🪡
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
See thread title.go pak go wrote: ↑16 Feb 2024 17:37No we usually suck in October - through mid November.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑16 Feb 2024 12:45Now that is positive. Maybe even overly-optimistic. I expect they will suck in September, only because they always do. But if they don't suck, it's gonna be a heckuva season for sure!Cdragon wrote: ↑14 Feb 2024 14:18I think one of the biggest things going forward is the amount of rookies who have gotten meaningful reps. And highly successful reps at that. They are going to be running into year 2 like it is their 3rd year. They know they can compete. I expect the offense to jump off the page early in the year!
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 535
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 09:49
...but if they kill it from then on...APB wrote: ↑17 Feb 2024 09:13See thread title.go pak go wrote: ↑16 Feb 2024 17:37No we usually suck in October - through mid November.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑16 Feb 2024 12:45
Now that is positive. Maybe even overly-optimistic. I expect they will suck in September, only because they always do. But if they don't suck, it's gonna be a heckuva season for sure!
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4223
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
New positivity: Doubs, Watson and Reed autographs on the same Packers mini-helmet.
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2944
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
Are you gonna try to get Wicks or any others too?RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024 18:37New positivity: Doubs, Watson and Reed autographs on the same Packers mini-helmet.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4223
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
Yes, I hope to get Wicks, Melton, and the 2 TEs (Kraft and Musgrave) whenever the occasion arises. Then Jordan Love if there's still room for him. This can be viewed as a "cleansing" exercise. A new and promising era in Packers offense.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑06 Apr 2024 11:18Are you gonna try to get Wicks or any others too?RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024 18:37New positivity: Doubs, Watson and Reed autographs on the same Packers mini-helmet.
No more Cobb, Lazard, Big Dog, Jimmy Graham, etc. hype.
The 2010 receiver corp and the pre-1996 Brooks Sharpe receiver corp was great. The 1983 receiver corp (Lofton, Jefferson, Coffman) was greater. The 1962 receiver corp (R. Kramer, Dowler, McGee) was epic. If the stars line up correctly, the 2024 receiver corp could compete as well.
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4223
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑06 Apr 2024 12:11Yes, I hope to get Wicks, Melton, and the 2 TEs (Kraft and Musgrave) whenever the occasion arises. Then Jordan Love if there's still room for him. This can be viewed as a "cleansing" exercise. A new and promising era in Packers offense.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑06 Apr 2024 11:18Are you gonna try to get Wicks or any others too?RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024 18:37New positivity: Doubs, Watson and Reed autographs on the same Packers mini-helmet.
No more Cobb, Lazard, Big Dog, Jimmy Graham, etc. hype.
The 2010 receiver corp and the pre-1996 Brooks Sharpe receiver corp were great. The 1983 receiver corp (Lofton, Jefferson, Coffman) was greater. The 1962 receiver corp (R. Kramer, Dowler, McGee) was epic. If the stars line up correctly, the 2024 receiver corp could compete as well.
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2944
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
You have a wealth of riches. Fantastic.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑06 Apr 2024 12:11Yes, I hope to get Wicks, Melton, and the 2 TEs (Kraft and Musgrave) whenever the occasion arises. Then Jordan Love if there's still room for him. This can be viewed as a "cleansing" exercise. A new and promising era in Packers offense.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑06 Apr 2024 11:18Are you gonna try to get Wicks or any others too?RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑01 Apr 2024 18:37New positivity: Doubs, Watson and Reed autographs on the same Packers mini-helmet.
No more Cobb, Lazard, Big Dog, Jimmy Graham, etc. hype.
The 2010 receiver corp and the pre-1996 Brooks Sharpe receiver corp was great. The 1983 receiver corp (Lofton, Jefferson, Coffman) was greater. The 1962 receiver corp (R. Kramer, Dowler, McGee) was epic. If the stars line up correctly, the 2024 receiver corp could compete as well.
I just scored my first mini helmet, with Sterling Sharpe's signature. I'm really pleased with that. But as I'm not a collector of stuff, that might be the only mini that I ever get. I can be happy with that one.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
It appears that the Packers filled all the holes in FA and the draft.
Safety went from a liability to a probable strength.
Stokes and Watson appear to be fully healthy. The Packers did not need to draft any WR's and the only CB was a 7th round project.
2 drafted ILB's that will immediately improve depth.
Both OT and IOL backups.
Ready for a legitimate SB run
Safety went from a liability to a probable strength.
Stokes and Watson appear to be fully healthy. The Packers did not need to draft any WR's and the only CB was a 7th round project.
2 drafted ILB's that will immediately improve depth.
Both OT and IOL backups.
Ready for a legitimate SB run
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 4223
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
And the kicker could be the kicker.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑28 Apr 2024 04:54It appears that the Packers filled all the holes in FA and the draft.
Safety went from a liability to a probable strength.
Stokes and Watson appear to be fully healthy. The Packers did not need to draft any WR's and the only CB was a 7th round project.
2 drafted ILB's that will immediately improve depth.
Both OT and IOL backups.
Ready for a legitimate SB run
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
Yeah but I think a large part of the kicker's problems were the long snapper and guess what position is on the UDFA.RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑28 Apr 2024 15:10And the kicker could be the kicker.TheSkeptic wrote: ↑28 Apr 2024 04:54It appears that the Packers filled all the holes in FA and the draft.
Safety went from a liability to a probable strength.
Stokes and Watson appear to be fully healthy. The Packers did not need to draft any WR's and the only CB was a 7th round project.
2 drafted ILB's that will immediately improve depth.
Both OT and IOL backups.
Ready for a legitimate SB run