Reed, and Watson if he can stay healthy will be here when hell fires smolder, the rest who knows.
imho these two have exceptional gifts of athletic ability, with Watson it's obviously speed and size, with Reed it's quicks and run after catch.
will be interesting to watch all of these guys mature.
Who will be our #1 WR
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3887
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
Not with me. See if Salmar wants to tackle that interesting problem.APB wrote: ↑26 Sep 2024 23:08I suppose I may need to copy/paste some dictionary definitions with you, too…RingoCStarrQB wrote: ↑26 Sep 2024 20:57In the context of the Packers offense, "interesting problem" should be self-explanatory....not require further discussion.APB wrote: ↑26 Sep 2024 09:55I don't see any "problem" with the WR corps whatsoever. They all bring certain talents and qualities that can be taken advantage of on any given play. They all have overlapping foundational talents, too, like blocking and low drop rates.
Having no clear cut, go to receiver is not a "problem" in my mind at all. It's scheme proof from an opponent perspective. Take away short area quickness Reed? Fine, we'll go to Wicks. Take away Doubs on 3rd down? Fine, we'll go Reed or Watson. Press at the line to disrupt the quick passing game? Fine, we'll hit Melton or Watson streaking up the sideline or down the seam. The matchup headaches these guys collectively present are endless.
This WR corps just offers so many options. The fact no one player is relied upon to carry the offense is an advantage, not a problem.
Now, @Yoop, if you wanna talk about individual attributes each brings to the table, that's something else entirely.
which dictionary? Daniels or the football version?
seriously, as God is my witness, I thought this was funny is everyone in this forum sitting on a corn cob
it shouldn't be up to just Ringo and I to add light hearted humor to this room, for goodness sakes
pre game Fridays use to be our busiest days, come on gang
- RingoCStarrQB
- Reactions:
- Posts: 3887
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 19:56
From Merriam-Webster --> PROBLEMYoop wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024 08:20which dictionary? Daniels or the football version?
seriously, as God is my witness, I thought this was funny is everyone in this forum sitting on a corn cob
it shouldn't be up to just Ringo and I to add light hearted humor to this room, for goodness sakes
pre game Fridays use to be our busiest days, come on gang
1 a: a question raised for inquiry, consideration, or solution
1 b: a proposition in mathematics or physics stating something to be done
2 a: an intricate unsettled question
2 b: a source of perplexity, distress, or vexation
2 c: difficulty in understanding or accepting
--> PRISSY
prissy
adjective
pris·sy ˈpri-sē
prissier; prissiest
Synonyms of prissy
: overly prim and precise : finicky