Green Bay Packers @ New Orleans Saints GDT - 9/27 - 7:20 CST

From Lambeau to Lombardi, Holmgren, McCarthy and LaFleur and from Starr to Favre, Rodgers and now Jordan Love we’re talking Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packers football. This Packers Forum is the place to talk NFL football and everything Packers. So, pull up a keyboard, make yourself at home and let’s talk some Packers football.

Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk

Who you got?

Packers put up 40+ again
13
35%
Brees can't throw 40+ anymore
12
32%
MVS with two catches of 40+ yards
4
11%
We hold Kamara to under 40+ yards
0
No votes
Rodgers is still our QB at 40+ years old
8
22%
 
Total votes: 37

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13131
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

image.png
image.png (29.88 KiB) Viewed 467 times
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13131
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

I have a feeling we are going to play without Adams and Clark.

However, we may also be playing the Saints without Chase Hansen, Michael Thomas, Marcus Davenport, and Trey Hendrickson (who has actually been balling out for the Saints the first two games).
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13131
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

image.png
image.png (18.87 KiB) Viewed 443 times
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5122
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

go pak go wrote:
24 Sep 2020 06:36
I have a feeling we are going to play without Adams and Clark.

However, we may also be playing the Saints without Chase Hansen, Michael Thomas, Marcus Davenport, and Trey Hendrickson (who has actually been balling out for the Saints the first two games).
I am 100% sure Clark won’t play. I’m about 75% Adams doesn’t.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9694
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

lupedafiasco wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:05
I am 100% sure Clark won’t play. I’m about 75% Adams doesn’t.
Cool speculation, bro; way to make it sound like evidence with numbers.

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8112
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

YoHoChecko wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:13
lupedafiasco wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:05
I am 100% sure Clark won’t play. I’m about 75% Adams doesn’t.
Cool speculation, bro; way to make it sound like evidence with numbers.
Not sure I would handicap any differently. I don't know why we didn't IR Clark, but I don't expect to see him until after The Bye. As for Adams, I think he has a better chance if you believe the "he wanted to go back in" crowd, but if he doesn't practice at all this week, I think it will be a foregone conclusion that they hold him out.
Image

Read More. Post Less.

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9694
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

NCF wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:32
Not sure I would handicap any differently. I don't know why we didn't IR Clark, but I don't expect to see him until after The Bye. As for Adams, I think he has a better chance if you believe the "he wanted to go back in" crowd, but if he doesn't practice at all this week, I think it will be a foregone conclusion that they hold him out.
I think Adams will play; I think Clark is unknown, and I don't see any reason to think we know.

Like you said, Clark wasn't IRed, so they didn't rule out a return before the bye. That sounds like the same rationale the Broncos are using with Lock--he might be ready in 2 weeks, he might be ready in 6, but IR doesn't give him a chance even. So they left it open, and we'll see.

I don't think Adams' issue is anything more than a little rest and stretching, and so they're making sure he's resting it and stretching

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13131
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

We have IR'd two people already so I don't get the obsession of IR'ing Clark. The only reason it would have been valuable is if we a get a slew of injuries either week 3 or week 4 and need an extra roster spot.

But even with that, the PSquad elevation thing just makes IR'ing so much less important.

There is already so much inherent flexibility.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13131
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

YoHoChecko wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:39
NCF wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:32
Not sure I would handicap any differently. I don't know why we didn't IR Clark, but I don't expect to see him until after The Bye. As for Adams, I think he has a better chance if you believe the "he wanted to go back in" crowd, but if he doesn't practice at all this week, I think it will be a foregone conclusion that they hold him out.
I think Adams will play; I think Clark is unknown, and I don't see any reason to think we know.

Like you said, Clark wasn't IRed, so they didn't rule out a return before the bye. That sounds like the same rationale the Broncos are using with Lock--he might be ready in 2 weeks, he might be ready in 6, but IR doesn't give him a chance even. So they left it open, and we'll see.

I don't think Adams' issue is anything more than a little rest and stretching, and so they're making sure he's resting it and stretching
Adams. Hamstring.

I don't know. That is just an injury to not make worse. And I don't know if a limited snap count would make sense on the hamstring either.

I'm not an expert in that area. But we cannot have him re-tweek it.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
NCF
Reactions:
Posts: 8112
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:04
Location: Hastings, MN

Post by NCF »

Image

Read More. Post Less.

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9694
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

NCF wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:10
... with fans present.

kyle.mccarroll
Reactions:
Posts: 267
Joined: 09 Sep 2020 13:22

Post by kyle.mccarroll »

YoHoChecko wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:27
NCF wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:10
... with fans present.
Exactly - IDGAF about a road game without fans, other than the fact that we are on turf and not grass (but I don't think that makes much difference anyways with this team).

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13131
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

kyle.mccarroll wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:49
YoHoChecko wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:27
NCF wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:10
... with fans present.
Exactly - IDGAF about a road game without fans, other than the fact that we are on turf and not grass (but I don't think that makes much difference anyways with this team).
Also why it's silly to give any worry about #1 seed this year. Even if there are fans in January....we are looking at likely 1/3 capacity at maximum.
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

YoHoChecko
Reactions:
Posts: 9694
Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34

Post by YoHoChecko »

go pak go wrote:
24 Sep 2020 12:19
Also why it's silly to give any worry about #1 seed this year. Even if there are fans in January....we are looking at likely 1/3 capacity at maximum.
The "only one team per conference gets a bye" advantage is pretty appealing, though. I never much cared about the home/away aspect between the 1 and 2 seeds, but I always cared about that free pass to the divisional round.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5122
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

go pak go wrote:
24 Sep 2020 12:19
kyle.mccarroll wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:49
YoHoChecko wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:27


... with fans present.
Exactly - IDGAF about a road game without fans, other than the fact that we are on turf and not grass (but I don't think that makes much difference anyways with this team).
Also why it's silly to give any worry about #1 seed this year. Even if there are fans in January....we are looking at likely 1/3 capacity at maximum.
No travel time required. We are clearly a running team which favors the cold. Possible, though unlikely, still possible that there will be fans by January. We don’t have to play on a field we aren’t used to.

Home field always matters.
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
lupedafiasco
Reactions:
Posts: 5122
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17

Post by lupedafiasco »

YoHoChecko wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:13
lupedafiasco wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:05
I am 100% sure Clark won’t play. I’m about 75% Adams doesn’t.
Cool speculation, bro; way to make it sound like evidence with numbers.
It is speculation. I never tried to put any evidence to it. I just know how are medical staff does things. Grumpy?
Cancelled by the forum elites.

User avatar
Yoop
Reactions:
Posts: 12092
Joined: 24 Mar 2020 09:23

Post by Yoop »

kyle.mccarroll wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:49
YoHoChecko wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:27
NCF wrote:
24 Sep 2020 11:10
... with fans present.
Exactly - IDGAF about a road game without fans, other than the fact that we are on turf and not grass (but I don't think that makes much difference anyways with this team).
huge, so much of what we do on offense, all our motion pre snap comes from Aarons cadence, hand signals, all of that can be much harder with a loud stadium, there is a saying that the crowd is the 12th man/player on defense, I agree.

User avatar
BF004
Reactions:
Posts: 13631
Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
Location: Suamico
Contact:

Post by BF004 »

go pak go wrote:
24 Sep 2020 12:19
Also why it's silly to give any worry about #1 seed this year. Even if there are fans in January....we are looking at likely 1/3 capacity at maximum.
I would very much prefer, especially with such an early bye week, to get an extra one and not have to play anybody vs. playing an above average to good team.
Image

Image

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13131
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

lupedafiasco wrote:
24 Sep 2020 12:33
YoHoChecko wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:13
lupedafiasco wrote:
24 Sep 2020 08:05
I am 100% sure Clark won’t play. I’m about 75% Adams doesn’t.
Cool speculation, bro; way to make it sound like evidence with numbers.
It is speculation. I never tried to put any evidence to it. I just know how are medical staff does things. Grumpy?
But do you know for 100% certainty?

Because Kenny Clark practiced today. ;)
Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

User avatar
go pak go
Reactions:
Posts: 13131
Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:30

Post by go pak go »

Yoop wrote:
26 May 2021 11:22
could we get some moderation in here to get rid of conspiracy theory's, some in here are trying to have a adult conversation.
Image

Post Reply