Jordan Love Discussion

[Crazylegs Starks]

Favre - you could tell he was special right away.
...

The Falcons (or Jerry Glanville more specifically) didn't see anything special.

[bud fox]

The "Chiefs have a bad defense" doesn't really matter here because of the game the Chiefs played.

What matters is MLF sucked at finding the right plays to beat their cover zero blitzing and the Oline and Love sucked at executing the plan.

But the Chiefs defense doesn't really matter here.

Why? If you play a bad team you should look better.

It is common sense.

[bud fox]

Favre - you could tell he was special right away.

Rodgers - His 1st preseason he looked horrible. It wasn’t until his 3rd year where he he finally showed something.

Love - Basically a redshirted rookie year. He has played 2 preseason games, a few minutes of garbage time and 1 NFL Start. It’s too soon to tell.

Heck of a play Love made to Mercedes Lewis even though it resulted in a loss.

LaFleur didn’t come up with an answer to the blitz. Empty backfields, long developing routes, and not enough use of the RBs out of the backfield (pass plays). Love was getting killed.

We’ll have to see if Love learned anything from this game…not sure when he’ll get a chance to play again though.

There is commentary on a documentary that coaches and other packers knew early on Rodgers was special. They say the things he was doing in practice was not normal.

[APB]

MLF took the blame for Love’s struggles when blitzed stating he called too many long developing plays and didn’t help his QB enough. MLF is a good coach and it’s exactly what he should be saying to the media.

However, MLF calls plays while the team is huddled up. It is up to the QB, during pre-snap reads, to recognize pressure looks and make adjustments to more favorable plays, as necessary. Whether it be by signals or, as in Rodgers case, just a look it is imperative for the offense to communicate a change response to what the defense is clearly showing.

None of that was happening yesterday. Or, at least, none of it was competently executed.

As several have said, all it would have taken was a couple plays of using KC’s aggressiveness against them and the blitzing would have stopped. Instead, Love was clearly unable to competently make and/or execute those adjustments and the blitzing became the over-riding theme.

Rodgers and Adams, with DA’s elite LOS separation skills, would easily defeat those Cover 0 blitzes. Love and Adams clearly struggled mightily. My guess is it wasn’t Adams. That, of course, assumes Adams, unlike MLF and the O-Line, didn’t lose all ability to function as he typically does and, again unlike MLF and the O-Line, didn’t directly contribute to #whyitwasntjordansfault.

[paco]

I have not watched this yet.

[Pckfn23]

Watch the above video, read and watch the Bukowski thread. I IMPLORE you. It will show you the good, the bad, and the ugly.

[bud fox]

Bukowski is a flop - he is a Rodgers hater. All his videos are the same - support of org based.

His video on Dafney - dumb - it was a block and release - timing is dependent on when he comes off the block - Love just missed the throw also due to pressure.

The play to Lazard was bad. He did not step into the pocket all night. He can see from the field that the middle is wide open and he has lazard running under Cobb so he will have release. Instead of stepping into the pocket his tackles create - his sits on his drop spot and then throws quick to Cobb on a pass he can't make.

Love was bad.

[Pckfn23]

O'Sullivan knocks the play design too. I think I am going to go with the actual NFL QB on this one.

image.png (208.86 KiB) Viewed 395 times

Hmmm

If one thinks that the was nothing good or almost nothing good about Love's play yesterday then there is NO credibility to be had.

[bud fox]

THat JT O Sullivan video is purely click bait. This is also obvious when he speaks about 'Woke' throws etc Guy is a flop and always has been.

Nearly no positives. Makes comments about some play design also being bad, says sometimes Love made right decision but missed throw. Ultimately the video shows how bad Love was. His comments are like "yeah a first round pick makes that throw" "yeah he should've done this".

Missed throws, didn't fix protection, didn't make the right throws.

[Foosball]

Favre - you could tell he was special right away.

Rodgers - His 1st preseason he looked horrible. It wasn’t until his 3rd year where he he finally showed something.

Love - Basically a redshirted rookie year. He has played 2 preseason games, a few minutes of garbage time and 1 NFL Start. It’s too soon to tell.

Heck of a play Love made to Mercedes Lewis even though it resulted in a loss.

LaFleur didn’t come up with an answer to the blitz. Empty backfields, long developing routes, and not enough use of the RBs out of the backfield (pass plays). Love was getting killed.

We’ll have to see if Love learned anything from this game…not sure when he’ll get a chance to play again though.

There is commentary on a documentary that coaches and other packers knew early on Rodgers was special. They say the things he was doing in practice was not normal.

Yep, but that was in his 3rd year. That’s why they decided to move on from Favre.

[bud fox]

O'Sullivan knocks the play design too. I think I am going to go with the actual NFL QB on this one.

If one thinks that the was nothing good or almost nothing good about Love's play yesterday then there is NO credibility to be had.

What was good - his throw to Adams with soft coverage. His throw to MVS which was good play design. His TD to Lazard under pressure was probably best but that corner for Chiefs is horrible.

Love was bad. His pocket play was atrocious. He didn't fix any protection. He missed throws. He made the wrong decisions on throws. He fumbled a snap because he doesn't realize what he is doing. It is probably difficult playing first game at Arrow Head but he was bad.

You literally just take the title as "oh wow some terrible QB was impressed with Love" when the whole video is Love missed this and this etc.

HE WAS BAD. HE PLAYED A BAD DEF AND HAD A QB RATING UNDER 70 - HAD AN INT - MISSED THROWS.

His longest play was close his eyes throw the ball as high as he can to Cobb - basically punted it.

All the commentary is he did bad but hey your sources of Bukowski (who) and JT O Sullivan, who in the actual video just says how bad everything is but titles it impressive from clickbait, override everything else.

[Pckfn23]

Haha, everyone who says Love made some good plays is a hack or a flop or whatever.

[bud fox]

Favre - you could tell he was special right away.

Rodgers - His 1st preseason he looked horrible. It wasn’t until his 3rd year where he he finally showed something.

Love - Basically a redshirted rookie year. He has played 2 preseason games, a few minutes of garbage time and 1 NFL Start. It’s too soon to tell.

Heck of a play Love made to Mercedes Lewis even though it resulted in a loss.

LaFleur didn’t come up with an answer to the blitz. Empty backfields, long developing routes, and not enough use of the RBs out of the backfield (pass plays). Love was getting killed.

We’ll have to see if Love learned anything from this game…not sure when he’ll get a chance to play again though.

There is commentary on a documentary that coaches and other packers knew early on Rodgers was special. They say the things he was doing in practice was not normal.

Yep, but that was in his 3rd year. That’s why they decided to move on from Favre.

No this was earlier but his third year was Dallas game I believe where everyone was like - damn this guy good.

[bud fox]

Haha, everyone who says Love made some good plays is a hack or a flop or whatever.

Yeah and 99% of everyone else in football is wrong.

But take your Bukowski every day of the week. I wont even include O Sullivan because his title is just click bait, the actual video just talks about how bad Love was.

Man you are on a loser - you have a loss, under 70 QB Rating, 1td/1int, terrible accuracy - but it wasnt a bad game.

When in the world did the above not be a bad game? When it was a Jordan Love or a non Rodgers packers QB game?

You so tied to the ship you are going to drown.

[Yoop]

Sullivan hits this square, Love was off on a few throws, and late on others, a big reason for it was pressure right up the B gaps past Patrick and Newman, the two got the worst offensive grades, plus some poor play designs.

imo a lot of what we saw was lack of experience with starters, it'll help for him to get another week of practice with them versus the scout team, only one day of practice with Adams and the rest showed the lack of chemistry.

[Pckfn23]

Love was bad.

He was not good, that's for sure, but there was more good than what you will admit because it doesn't fit your narrative.

His pocket play was atrocious.

That was actually what was good highlighted by his numbers from a clean pocket.

He didn't fix any protection.

This is not true. The first play proves this.

He missed throws.

He definitely did.

He made the wrong decisions on throws.

He definitely did.

He fumbled a snap because he doesn't realize what he is doing.

He fumbled a snap because he was in the middle of changing the protection, which you say didn't happen...

You literally just take the title as "oh wow some terrible QB was impressed with Love" when the whole video is Love missed this and this etc.

I didn't say that. I didn't do any of that. I simply commented on one play and how OSullivan said it was a bad design. You are so caught up in Rodgers over team that you can not and will not live in reality and must fabricate things that are not there and are not said.

HE PLAYED A BAD DEF AND HAD A QB RATING UNDER 70 - HAD AN INT - MISSED THROWS.

Who disagrees with is?

All the commentary is he did bad but hey your sources of Bukowski (who) and JT O Sullivan, who in the actual video just says how bad everything is but titles it impressive from clickbait, override everything else.

You didn't even watch the video or follow the twitter thread. It is evident in what you think you "saw" and are commenting on.

[Captain_Ben]

There is commentary on a documentary that coaches and other packers knew early on Rodgers was special. They say the things he was doing in practice was not normal.

Yep, but that was in his 3rd year. That’s why they decided to move on from Favre.

No this was earlier but his third year was Dallas game I believe where everyone was like - damn this guy good.

Packers players and coaches knew early on that they had something special in Rodgers. Before the third season. This was discussed in detail in Jeff Pearlman's biography of Brett Favre, Gunslinger.

[Pckfn23]

Haha, everyone who says Love made some good plays is a hack or a flop or whatever.

Yeah and 99% of everyone else in football is wrong.

What are they wrong about?

But take your Bukowski every day of the week. I wont even include O Sullivan because his title is just click bait, the actual video just talks about how bad Love was.

It actually doesn't, but you didn't watch it, so you wouldn't know.

Man you are on a loser - you have a loss, under 70 QB Rating, 1td/1int, terrible accuracy - but it wasnt a bad game.

When did I say it was not a bad game? You might want to step back and read what is ACTUALLY being written instead of getting worked up because people don't agree that everything was bad.

When in the world did the above not be a bad game? When it was a Jordan Love or a non Rodgers packers QB game?

You so tied to the ship you are going to drown.

You are so caught up in your own narrative you don't even understand what is being said.

[Captain_Ben]

Sullivan hits this square, Love was off on a few throws, and late on others, a big reason for it was pressure right up the B gaps past Patrick and Newman, the two got the worst offensive grades, plus some poor play designs.

imo a lot of what we saw was lack of experience with starters, it'll help for him to get another week of practice with them versus the scout team, only one day of practice with Adams and the rest showed the lack of chemistry.

Practice reps with scout team offense vs. starting Packers defense should have adequately prepared him for reps with starters vs. KC defense, no?

[Pckfn23]

Watch the above video, read and watch the Bukowski thread. I IMPLORE you. It will show you the good, the bad, and the ugly.

This is literally my $%@# comment... How that got bastardized and lead that &%$@ storm is beyond... Nevermind, I know how it did.