We will never know because it won't happen, but I would bet a lot that we would not draft a QB at 30 if all of them fell there.Pugger wrote: ↑24 Mar 2020 18:52I've been voting for Burrow since this started. If either one of these 2 are there at 30 Gute will take one of 'em. We didn't need Rodgers at 24 in 2005 either.Packfntk wrote: ↑24 Mar 2020 10:39Him or Tua are the best at the position in the draft, which is the most important position in the game. I believe they are already better than probably 10-15 the starting QB's in the league, at the age of 22-23. You wouldn't immediately hop on him at 30? Good Lord.NCF wrote: ↑24 Mar 2020 10:35
Not if these other 10-15 guys we are voting ahead of Burrow were also there. I don't get the Burrow love. He's not that special of a QB. Yeah, at 30, I'd have to think long and hard about it and it probably would be the best pick, but Burrow is not some generational talent.
Packers Big Board - #9
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14475
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
- Backthepack4ever
- Reactions:
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 21:19
- Contact:
Ha. Not to re live the BF thing but at 30 we still have 5 years control not 4. I would say 3 behind AR....sooner if injury and the next 2 years you have that window. Heck if they like what they see maybe a reasonable extension. I just cant get on board of passing on a guy I feel will be top 10 nc we have a 35 year old qb now.
This ain't no Big Board.
This is Packers Big Board!!!
I went with Beckton and then Queen.
I love me some Queen.
I love me some Queen.
- BF004
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 13862
- Joined: 17 Mar 2020 16:05
- Location: Suamico
- Contact:
Polls here you can have up to 20 options and for these polls now I'm setting to 3 votes per user, so make your votes count.
Also, any and everyone is welcome to make the next poll whenever one looks like it has run its course.
Also, any and everyone is welcome to make the next poll whenever one looks like it has run its course.
I prefer Queen out of the two.
Read More. Post Less.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14475
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
Undersized ILBs worry me. I seriously haven't looked, but how many examples are there of them succeeding in both the run and pass?
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
He's a LB, though. He's physical, he's a solid tackler. He's not this overhang defender/quasi-safety type of guy, so that makes me feel a little better.
At the end of the day, I don't think you can go wrong with either one of them.
Read More. Post Less.
the thing is, at the end of 1 neither will be available, of the two I agree NCF Queen will go first, NFL.Com (who could be wrong) grade him Higher and Murphy isn't that much bigger, they rate Queen as the 11th and Murphy 18th highest rated players in the entire class.
Queen would have been the starter earlier for LSU except for the top tier lbers there before him of Jones, Alexander, and last years Devon White, and non where what you'd call big, but all a 3 dn lbers.
https://www.nfl.com/prospects/patrick-q ... 9ee3bd3f96
There really isn't a ton of consensus, which is somewhat surprising. I am not giving up hope that one of them will be there. But, if they are both gone, seemingly that will push one or more of the WR's or OT's down to us. It can play out so many ways, but only 29 players can actually be drafted before we are on the clock.
Read More. Post Less.