I think he has plenty. If the Packers have no intention of drafting a replacement, are they going to threaten to get a vet or go with Clifford if Love holds out? Love, at minimum, should hold the Packers feet to the fire. Commit or let me go.Drj820 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 09:53I dont think he has any choice unless his play becomes amazing and we continue to not give him a better deal.paco wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 09:41If you're Love, do you have any intention of playing on your current deal next season? I certainly wouldn't.Drj820 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 09:36
giants gave jones a horrible contract, and got to see him for a few years before they made the bad decision. I think Murphy wanted to know at about half the season, but he def needs longer to evaluate. Too many bad things going on around Love to get a true read...and lucky for him..he doesnt have to know yet! Love is under contract next year, so murphy can feel free to do nothing until at least the offseason. The try out is still ongoing!
At this point, i dont think he has much leverage.
Green Bay Packers News 2023
Moderators: NCF, salmar80, BF004, APB, Packfntk
RIP JustJeff
I think he would have done that this year with the 5th year option if he was going to go that route. Love is playing fine, but if he wanted to play hardball, we could easily get to 3-7 with someone else at QBpaco wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 10:37I think he has plenty. If the Packers have no intention of drafting a replacement, are they going to threaten to get a vet or go with Clifford if Love holds out? Love, at minimum, should hold the Packers feet to the fire. Commit or let me go.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
They will definitely have an intention of drafting a replacement, armed with a Top-10 pick in a draft that's deep at QB, if he does THAT.paco wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 10:37I think he has plenty. If the Packers have no intention of drafting a replacement, are they going to threaten to get a vet or go with Clifford if Love holds out? Love, at minimum, should hold the Packers feet to the fire. Commit or let me go.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
Then maybe its best for everyone. Regardless, I have a hard time seeing us going into next season with the QB situation we have today, or at least not the contract situation.Labrev wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 10:50They will definitely have an intention of drafting a replacement, armed with a Top-10 pick in a draft that's deep at QB, if he does THAT.
RIP JustJeff
Yeah, I don't think Love has much leverage at all. If he was playing lights out then he would. But he is a bottom 5 preferred starter (non-injury replacement) in the league right now.
- lupedafiasco
- Reactions:
- Posts: 5325
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020 17:17
Not a single other team would be bidding for Love as they’re starting QB in FA. He would at the very best be a bridge QB in Teddy B territory. Young enough to possibly have potential and kick the tires on but in no way are you banking your franchise in him.paco wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 10:37I think he has plenty. If the Packers have no intention of drafting a replacement, are they going to threaten to get a vet or go with Clifford if Love holds out? Love, at minimum, should hold the Packers feet to the fire. Commit or let me go.
Cancelled by the forum elites.
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 535
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 09:49
I'm not aware of the possibilities, but what WOULD you do? I understand those players that outperformed their contract and that the team really, really want's back. But, with over half the season gone and no real indication that Love is going to be IT, does he have any leverage?paco wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 09:41If you're Love, do you have any intention of playing on your current deal next season? I certainly wouldn't.Drj820 wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 09:36giants gave jones a horrible contract, and got to see him for a few years before they made the bad decision. I think Murphy wanted to know at about half the season, but he def needs longer to evaluate. Too many bad things going on around Love to get a true read...and lucky for him..he doesnt have to know yet! Love is under contract next year, so murphy can feel free to do nothing until at least the offseason. The try out is still ongoing!
- TheSkeptic
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2208
- Joined: 25 Mar 2020 01:37
Assuming that Love does not improve dramatically, why would he want to go anywhere else? A new coach, a new system, all new WR's. This is a big gamble on failure for him. If he stays and makes steady improvement, he will get paid in GB and in the meantime he is the starter.Half Empty wrote: ↑13 Nov 2023 13:10I'm not aware of the possibilities, but what WOULD you do? I understand those players that outperformed their contract and that the team really, really want's back. But, with over half the season gone and no real indication that Love is going to be IT, does he have any leverage?
At this point Love should be happy to he is pretty much guaranteed another chance to start at QB next year. He looks to be focused on putting out great tape, not his 2024 check. The check will easily come if his play gets hot.
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur
Love hasn't come even close to playing well enough for him to think about holding out for a new contract next offseason. If that happens I expect the Packers to move on from him and take the $7 million of dead money counting against their cap in 2024.
It's designed to not give up explosive PASS plays, which they haven't, just getting gashed so hard in the run that even bad QBs can beat us.
“Most other nations don't allow a terrorist to be their leader.”
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
“... Yet so many allow their leaders to be terrorists.”—Magneto
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14460
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
They are middle of the road in giving up explosive pass plays though.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
Tied for 8th by my count.
- Pckfn23
- Huddle Heavy Hitter
- Reactions:
- Posts: 14460
- Joined: 22 Mar 2020 22:13
- Location: Western Wisconsin
I was going by percentage, which was 14th, I believe.
Palmy - "Very few have the ability to truly excel regardless of system. For many the system is the difference between being just a guy or an NFL starter. Fact is, everyone is talented at this level."
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 592
- Joined: 27 Mar 2020 22:22
Love would be foolish to hold out for a new contract at this point. If he were to demand a new contract and we were to give it, it would be a below market value contract. Not a chance he's getting 4 yr 160 at this point. If he continues to improve, I expect he has a new deal by week8/9 next season.
- Scott4Pack
- Reactions:
- Posts: 2926
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 03:41
- Location: New Mexico
Love will get a nice contract from the Packers.
Love should get a nice contract from the Packers.
Love is possibly underperforming in some ways, or at least inconsistent (accuracy?). But he is steadily making more plays, even against good defenses.
We need to pay him. He won't get top tier pay. But he should get a nice check.
Love should get a nice contract from the Packers.
Love is possibly underperforming in some ways, or at least inconsistent (accuracy?). But he is steadily making more plays, even against good defenses.
We need to pay him. He won't get top tier pay. But he should get a nice check.
Come on down and try some of our delicious green chili! Best in the world!
-
- Reactions:
- Posts: 9712
- Joined: 26 Mar 2020 11:34
Sorry I don't post much when the Packers aren't good, but when the Packers aren't good, I want to spend less of my free time typing and thinking and talking about the Packers. I'm still wearing green and gold and rooting on Sundays.
But I did want to drop by with a thought or two, which is basically this:
The Packers' schedule and results have broken down to paint a really clear picture.
The team has played 9 games. Five of those games have been 1-score games.
The 1-score games have been against teams that are:
6-3
5-5
5-5
4-6
4-5
The 6-3 team has been outgained by every opponent, but knows how to win.
The Packers have won two games fairly convincingly, against teams who are
3-7
3-6
The Packers have also lost two games convincingly against teams who are
7-3
6-4
It's pretty clear that the Packers aren't good enough to beat good teams, are good enough to beat bad teams and belong squarely in the middle group, with all the mediocre teams hovering around .500, where each game has been competitive and most come down to the last few plays.
But the Packers are 1-4 in those 1-score games. Because they just don't know how to win.
Now, they could be too young. They could have poor leadership/coaching. They could have a QB who just can't get it done in the big moments. They could have some combination of the 3. And I guess that's probably what everyone is trying to figure out.
But it does seem clear to me that despite the W/L record showing we're more like the teams we beat resoundingly than the teams we lost to by a FG or two along the way, we're emerging as a team like that middle tier group.
And I say that only to say that while the WINS have gone decidedly worse than I expected, and I thought we'd be competing with Minnesota for that playoff slot.... the season is in large part going just how we anticipated. We're a mediocre team going through growing pains. For a minute, I had convinced myself that we're just a bad team.
But then the Raiders and Broncos kept winning and I re-evaluated.
So I guess my stance is "not ready to blow it up yet," but also "need to see some growth and development if we want to stay on this path and find any success."
But I did want to drop by with a thought or two, which is basically this:
The Packers' schedule and results have broken down to paint a really clear picture.
The team has played 9 games. Five of those games have been 1-score games.
The 1-score games have been against teams that are:
6-3
5-5
5-5
4-6
4-5
The 6-3 team has been outgained by every opponent, but knows how to win.
The Packers have won two games fairly convincingly, against teams who are
3-7
3-6
The Packers have also lost two games convincingly against teams who are
7-3
6-4
It's pretty clear that the Packers aren't good enough to beat good teams, are good enough to beat bad teams and belong squarely in the middle group, with all the mediocre teams hovering around .500, where each game has been competitive and most come down to the last few plays.
But the Packers are 1-4 in those 1-score games. Because they just don't know how to win.
Now, they could be too young. They could have poor leadership/coaching. They could have a QB who just can't get it done in the big moments. They could have some combination of the 3. And I guess that's probably what everyone is trying to figure out.
But it does seem clear to me that despite the W/L record showing we're more like the teams we beat resoundingly than the teams we lost to by a FG or two along the way, we're emerging as a team like that middle tier group.
And I say that only to say that while the WINS have gone decidedly worse than I expected, and I thought we'd be competing with Minnesota for that playoff slot.... the season is in large part going just how we anticipated. We're a mediocre team going through growing pains. For a minute, I had convinced myself that we're just a bad team.
But then the Raiders and Broncos kept winning and I re-evaluated.
So I guess my stance is "not ready to blow it up yet," but also "need to see some growth and development if we want to stay on this path and find any success."
Love us a bottom 5 preferred started (in, not starting due to injury). He is the type of player you look to replace. Can he get better, say to be an average starter? Maybe, but he isn't there now.Scott4Pack wrote: ↑14 Nov 2023 15:36Love will get a nice contract from the Packers.
Love should get a nice contract from the Packers.
Love is possibly underperforming in some ways, or at least inconsistent (accuracy?). But he is steadily making more plays, even against good defenses.
We need to pay him. He won't get top tier pay. But he should get a nice check.
There are like 8 or 9 first rounders on the defense, if that didn’t equate to being in close games against mid teams then everyone should be fired yesterday
I Do Not Hate Matt Lafleur