Packers Huddle

Pugger wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 18:52

Packfntk wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 10:39

NCF wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 10:35

Not if these other 10-15 guys we are voting ahead of Burrow were also there. I don't get the Burrow love. He's not that special of a QB. Yeah, at 30, I'd have to think long and hard about it and it probably would be the best pick, but Burrow is not some generational talent.

Him or Tua are the best at the position in the draft, which is the most important position in the game. I believe they are already better than probably 10-15 the starting QB's in the league, at the age of 22-23. You wouldn't immediately hop on him at 30? Good Lord.

I've been voting for Burrow since this started. If either one of these 2 are there at 30 Gute will take one of 'em. We didn't need Rodgers at 24 in 2005 either.

We will never know because it won't happen, but I would bet a lot that we would not draft a QB at 30 if all of them fell there.

Ha. Not to re live the BF thing but at 30 we still have 5 years control not 4. I would say 3 behind AR....sooner if injury and the next 2 years you have that window. Heck if they like what they see maybe a reasonable extension. I just cant get on board of passing on a guy I feel will be top 10 nc we have a 35 year old qb now.

Packfntk wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 12:14

Man, I guess others look at big boards differently. I always thought you rate who you see the best talent regardless of position.

This ain't no Big Board.

This is Packers Big Board!!!

I went with Beckton and then Queen.

I love me some Queen.

go pak go wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 19:54

I went with Beckton and then Queen.

I love me some Queen.

I read "went with Beck and then Queen" and thought this was the "What are you listening to" -thread.... Time for Sal to ZZzzzzzzzz....

salmar80 wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 20:00

I read "went with Beck and then Queen" and thought this was the "What are you listening to" -thread.... Time for Sal to ZZzzzzzzzz....

Polls here you can have up to 20 options and for these polls now I'm setting to 3 votes per user, so make your votes count.


Also, any and everyone is welcome to make the next poll whenever one looks like it has run its course.

go pak go wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 19:54

I went with Beckton and then Queen.

I love me some Queen.

be interesting to see what GM's think and who is picked first between Queen, who I think we need, and Murray who I think Pettine may prefer.

Yoop wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2020 09:17

go pak go wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 19:54

I went with Beckton and then Queen.

I love me some Queen.

be interesting to see what GM's think and who is picked first between Queen, who I think we need, and Murray who I think Pettine may prefer.

I prefer Queen out of the two.

NCF wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2020 09:48

Yoop wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2020 09:17

go pak go wrote: ↑

24 Mar 2020 19:54

I went with Beckton and then Queen.

I love me some Queen.

be interesting to see what GM's think and who is picked first between Queen, who I think we need, and Murray who I think Pettine may prefer.

I prefer Queen out of the two.

Undersized ILBs worry me. I seriously haven't looked, but how many examples are there of them succeeding in both the run and pass?

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2020 11:10

Undersized ILBs worry me. I seriously haven't looked, but how many examples are there of them succeeding in both the run and pass?

He's a LB, though. He's physical, he's a solid tackler. He's not this overhang defender/quasi-safety type of guy, so that makes me feel a little better.



At the end of the day, I don't think you can go wrong with either one of them.

NCF wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2020 11:54

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2020 11:10

Undersized ILBs worry me. I seriously haven't looked, but how many examples are there of them succeeding in both the run and pass?

He's a LB, though. He's physical, he's a solid tackler. He's not this overhang defender/quasi-safety type of guy, so that makes me feel a little better.



At the end of the day, I don't think you can go wrong with either one of them.

the thing is, at the end of 1 neither will be available, of the two I agree NCF Queen will go first, NFL.Com (who could be wrong) grade him Higher and Murphy isn't that much bigger, they rate Queen as the 11th and Murphy 18th highest rated players in the entire class.

Queen would have been the starter earlier for LSU except for the top tier lbers there before him of Jones, Alexander, and last years Devon White, and non where what you'd call big, but all a 3 dn lbers.


https://www.nfl.com/prospects/patrick-q ... 9ee3bd3f96

Yoop wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2020 12:20

the thing is, at the end of 1 neither will be available, of the two I agree NCF Queen will go first, NFL.Com (who could be wrong) grade him Higher and Murphy isn't that much bigger, they rate Queen as the 11th and Murphy 18th highest rated players in the entire class.

There really isn't a ton of consensus, which is somewhat surprising. I am not giving up hope that one of them will be there. But, if they are both gone, seemingly that will push one or more of the WR's or OT's down to us. It can play out so many ways, but only 29 players can actually be drafted before we are on the clock.