Packers Huddle

go pak go wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2023 17:56

Pckfn23 wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2023 17:52

go pak go wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2023 17:51

Love threw a ball 53 yards in the air on the first play today.

18 to the 22, so he did what was claimed he could never do, throw it 60 yards!

Oh that's true!! I just assumed from the 25 to 22 because the 25 was the LOS

YoHoChecko wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2023 21:55

what the heck even is this throw??

BF004 wrote: ↑

25 Nov 2023 15:46

BF004 wrote: ↑

25 Nov 2023 15:46

BF004 wrote: ↑

25 Nov 2023 15:46

go pak go wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2023 13:46

My point of the above post is not to down Rodgers.

*sit down Rodgers booty lickers*

My point is to level set expectations with Love. He is doing more than okay for this year.

Jordan Love Through Game 11
Week 1, at Chicago (win): 15-of-27 passing, 245 yards, three touchdowns vs. zero interceptions, 123.2 rating.
Week 2, at Atlanta (loss): 14-of-25 passing, 151 yards, three touchdowns vs. zero interceptions, 113.5 rating.
Week 3, New Orleans (win): 22-of-44 passing, 259 yards, one touchdown vs. one interception, 66.4 rating.
Week 4, Detroit (loss): 23-of-36 passing, 246 yards, one touchdown vs. two interceptions, 69.9 rating.
Week 5, Las Vegas (loss): 16-of-30 passing, 182 yards, zero touchdowns vs. three interceptions, 32.2 rating.
Week 6, bye.
Week 7, Denver (loss): 21-of-31 passing, 180 yards, two touchdowns vs. one interception, 90.8 rating.
Week 8, Minnesota (loss): 24-of-41 passing, 229 yards, one touchdown vs. one interception, 72.1 rating.
Week 9, L.A. Rams (win): 20-of-26 passing, 228 yards, one touchdown vs. zero interceptions, 115.5 rating.
Week 10, Pittsburgh (loss): 21-of-40 passing, 289 yards, two touchdowns vs. two interceptions, 71.8 rating.
Week 11, L.A. Chargers (win): 27-of-40 passing, 322 yards, two touchdowns vs. zero interceptions, 108.5 rating.
Week 12, Detroit (win): 22-of-32 passing, 268 yards, three touchdowns vs. zero interceptions, 125.5 rating.
Total: 225-of-372 passing (60.5 percent), 2,599 yards, 19 touchdowns vs. 10 interceptions, 87.4 rating.

Aaron Rodgers Through Game 11
Week 1, Minnesota (win): 18-of-22 passing, 178 yards, one touchdown vs. zero interceptions, 115.5 rating.
Week 2, at Detroit (win): 24-of-38 passing, 328 yards, three touchdowns vs. zero interceptions, 117.0 rating.
Week 3, Dallas (loss): 22-of-39 passing, 290 yards, zero touchdowns vs. zero interceptions, 80.1 rating.
Week 4, Tampa Bay (loss): 14-of-27 passing, 165 yards, two touchdowns vs. three interceptions, 55.9 rating.
Week 5, Atlanta (loss): 25-of-37 passing, 313 yards, three touchdowns vs. one interception, 109.4 rating.
Week 6, Seattle (win): 21-of-30 passing, 208 yards, two touchdowns vs. zero interceptions, 111.5 rating.
Week 7, Indianapolis (win): 21-of-28 passing, 186 yards, one touchdown vs. zero interceptions, 104.2 rating.
Week 8: Bye
Week 9, Tennessee (loss): 22-of-41 passing, 314 yards, one touchdown vs. one interception, 76.7 rating.
Week 10, Minnesota (loss): 15-of-26 passing for 142 yards, zero touchdowns vs. zero interceptions, 72.9 rating.
Week 11, Chicago (win): 23-of-30 passing, 227 yards, two touchdowns vs. one interception, 105.8 rating.
Week 12, New Orleans (loss): 23-of-41 passing, 248 yards, two touchdowns vs. three interceptions, 59.8 rating.
Total: 228-of-359 passing (63.5 percent), 2,599 yards, 17 touchdowns vs. 9 interceptions, 90.5 rating.

go pak go wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2023 13:42

When going back on the "eye test" in 2008, I think hindsight and legend really skew people's perception of Rodgers in 2008.

Yes he was decent for a first year starter and had reason to hope he "could be our guy" but I think people remember Rodgers being incredible in 2008 and the only reason we lost 10 games was because of our defense which isn't entirely true at all. Rodgers had his ups and downs. Here is a snippet of Rodgers first 11 games in 2008

The only game Rodgers played well enough to win but still didn't was the loss to Matt Ryan and Roddy White at Lambeau Field.

image.png

go pak go wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2023 13:46

My point of the above post is not to down Rodgers.

*sit down Rodgers booty lickers*

My point is to level set expectations with Love. He is doing more than okay for this year.

texas wrote: ↑

26 Nov 2023 19:35

Maybe the perception of some people is skewed, but not for me. I specifically remember repeatedly making the argument going into 2009, to multiple people, that Rodgers was actually great and it was our defense that let us down. He wasn't what he became but even without the hindsight rose-colored glasses, my opinion of him at the time was that we had a superstar in the making. I don't feel that way about Love yet.

I think I probably think more highly of Love than the average person here, yet I don't think he's Rodgers and I don't think he needs to be. If he just plays within the system MLF sets up for him he might even outperform Rodgers, but in my opinion he won't be as elite as Rodgers.

dsr wrote: ↑

27 Nov 2023 03:30

Though one thing about the original premise of this thread - which other QB can we compare him to - if we have reached the stage of being in the same conversation as Rodgers, then he's doing pretty darn good. We all need to remember that "not as good as Rodgers" does not disqualify a man from being a good NFL quarterback!

Acrobat wrote: ↑

27 Nov 2023 07:49

dsr, to your point, I had mentioned this to a buddy before the season started that following Rodgers is actually MORE difficult than following Favre, not only because Rodgers had a TD/INT ratio that was out of this world compared to history, but now we've had 30 years of HOF QB's, which would make the come down from that even steeper.